Chance

Chance

All posts 2,301-2,350 of 2,683 posts
Image of The Sanctuary (Timber Circle) by Chance

The Sanctuary

Timber Circle

Plan 1

This is the “current” version of the ground plan. There are a number of diffences between this and the earlier, but more detailed mono graphic ground plan. The sarsen stones are blue in colour and their orientation towards the circle gives a hint towards their purpose. The red circles indicate the various phases of the wooden elements.

The Cunningtons broke the site down into 7 rings. Here the number of holes and thier diameters are recoded.
Note: only ring A, the outer ring contained only stones and C – The Stone-and-post ring, with 32 holes, only had 16 stones.

A – The outer ring of 42 stone holes, 130 ft in dia.
B – The Fence ring of 34 stake holes, 65 ft in dia.
C – The Stone-and-post ring, 32 holes, 45 ft in dia.
D – The Bank Holiday ring, 12 holes, 34 1/2 ft in dia.
E – 10 foot ring, 8 holes, 21 ft dia.
F – 7 foot ring, 8 holes, 15 ft dia.
G – 6 foot ring, 6 holes, 13 ft dia.

There seems to be no reason why the outer ring only contained 42 stones. Maybe this was the number of tribes who came together to build the Avebury complex in it’s final stage.

Miscellaneous

The Sanctuary
Timber Circle

The burial By M. E. Cunnington – 1930

One burial was found. This consisted of a much crouched skeleton of a youth some 14 or 15 years of age, lying in a shallow grave on the inner side of the stone hole 12, in the Stone-and-post-ring, i.e., on the eastern side of the rings immediately behind the one single-post hole in the Bank Holiday ring (Plate X.).

The skeleton lay on its right side, head to the south, feet to the north i.e., facing east. The grave was l ft. deep, 3ft. long, by 2ft. wide. The
grave and the stone hole cut into one another, and the body must have almost, if not quite, touched the inner face of the stone at the time of
burial, if the stone was already standing. See PL III., 1.

The arms were crossed above the elbow in front of the face, the two hands seeming to enfold the face, finger bones being found over and under the facial bones ; the head was bent forward over the chest, and the legs were crossed below the knees.
In front of the legs just below the knees lay the crushed fragments of a beaker. Intimately associated with the skeleton, apparently having been laid on the body when it was buried, were some bones of animals, some being slightly charred. A few small flecks of charred (or decayed?) wood were noticed among the bones of the skeleton.

The bones of the skeleton were nearly all broken, most of the limb bones being in several pieces. The skull and the beaker were crushed flat and a few fragments of both were missing ; it seems that this was probably due to a certain amount of disturbance caused when the stone fell, or was thrown down and removed.
Some of the crushing may be due to heavy modern agricultural machines.

It is hardly possible that the burial was made before the stone hole was dug ; the probability seems to be that it was made at the time the stone was erected, for the risk of bringing down the stone would have been considerable had the grave been dug Later. As all the ground within and including the Fence-ring was dug over, had there been other burials they must have been found, so this with Woodhenge makes the second elaborate series of wooden circles that were not erected primarily as burial places.

This solitary somewhat insignifcant burial may have been of a dedicatory nature as the only one of the rings at Woodhenge is thought to have been.
The evidence from the burial affords a striking parallel to that of the pottery as regards an overlap in cultures. While some of the pottery is of the West Kennet Long Barrow type the rest is equally characteristic of the succeeding “Beaker” period. The youth buried beside the stone was of
Long Barrow people ancestry, but the vessel by his side is one typical of the “Beaker” people, who invaded Britian at the end of the Long Barrow period, imposing their culture—and presumably conquering—the Long Barrow people who were previously predominant in southern Britain.
Better evidence of overlap could scarcely be expected.

The only other human remains found were three pieces of a lower jaw scattered in stone hole 16 of the Stone-and-post-ring ; the pieces were sub-
sequently fitted together but do not make a complete jaw.

Image of Stonehenge (Stone Circle) by Chance

Stonehenge

Stone Circle

Station Stone, number 92, is the most significant of the four station stones. Lying to the south east of stonehenge, within the Aubery holes, this stone is understood to be an ancient marker. Only two of the four station stones remain, the other two where positioned on top of the north and south barrows. See the Stonehenge plan for an overall view of these features.

Image credit: Chance - Ostrada 09
Image of Stonehenge (Stone Circle) by Chance

Stonehenge

Stone Circle

The Slaughter stone lies in it’s ancient burial pit. It would appear never to have been lifted since being buried during a later period of the henge construction. Who knows what mystery’s lie beneath this sarsan.

Image credit: Chance - Ostrada 09
Image of Stonehenge (Stone Circle) by Chance

Stonehenge

Stone Circle

The Slaughter stone lies between Stonehenge and the Heel stone and appears to have been buried during a later period of the henge construction.

Image credit: Chance - Ostrada 09

Uffington Castle Long Mound

Uffington Long mound

Made a point of looking for this feature, along with its neighbouring tumulus, when visiting Uffington Castle this afternoon.
Marked on the O.S. map between the hillfort and the white horse, this mound is easily missed unless you where dogged enough to hunt it out.
It would appear that the mound has not been reinstated since it’s excavation in 1857/1993 and it’s original shape and height would have been considerably larger. Hard to believe that 46 bodies have been unearthed here.

Uffington Castle Round Barrow

Uffington Tumulus

Had a good look for this tumulus when visiting Uffington Castle this afternoon.
Although it is clearly marked on the O.S. map between the hillfort and the white horse, finding it on the ground was a little disappointing.
Standing less than a meter high, the barrow is easily missed when walking north towards the white horse, and even when identified, didn’t seem to amount to much. All I can say is that its position on the crest of the hill was probably pronounced when first constructed.

Image of Bury Wood Camp (Hillfort) by Chance

Bury Wood Camp

Hillfort

Pure Joy writes “Local folklore says that there is a rift in the earth at the camp where the dead from a battle were thrown into.”

Image credit: Chance - Feb 2009

Bury Wood Camp

Field Notes
Bury Wood Camp, Iron Age Hillfort, Colerne – Feb 2009

Scheduled Monument: SM28993 : SMR Number: ST87SW203
history.wiltshire.gov.uk/smr/getsmr.php?id=2244

Most of the hill forts in Wiltshire are set in green pastures with lots of sheep milling around.Bury Wood Camp has it’s wildlife too, during the summer, it turns into a muddy mosquitoe and snake infested swamp, with lots of Gurka soilders running around on exercise. Most hillforts are tranquil places of quiet reflection with nothing more than the winds whistle for the background sound effect.
This one came with noise of small arms fire, mortars and the light buzz of a spotter plane.

Having explored the site from different angles, I would suggest that you come in via the north east end.

Nowadays there is a bus stop on the A420 Bristol Road and even a pull in large enough for a coach. Best to park up by the church in North Wraxell and walk through the village, and down to Bristol Road, via the bridleway. Walk down the track and when you get to the stable, take the right hand bridleway down the steep incline to the bottom of Doncombe Brook. A ruined but working stone bridge takes you over the brook and into a wooded area brimming with wildlife.

The most direct route up to the fort is by crossing the brook, before you reach the bridge (take your wellies) and march up the steep hill ahead of you. This will take you up to the original north western entrance. If you follow the bridle way, then you can cross the brook further on by another stone bridge, which will take you along the eastern flank of the hillfort. The paths are well used by dog walkers and horses, so expect mud.

The woods have some spectacular Oak and Beach trees, along with plantations of Firs. The recent storms had taken off some big branches and parts of the track were blocked in places, although nothing you couldn’t get around.

Most of what we know about this promontory fort, and its enclosed 9 hectares, comes from the excavations made by Denis Grant-King in the 1960’s.
Although the general history of the fort, beginning with its initial building, can be dated to about 350 BC, various Neolithic and Mesolithic flint tools were removed, indicating much earlier use. Rotary and saddle querns were also recovered, along with a possible axe polishing stone.

The fort is sub-triangular with entrances at the NW & E. The main rampart across the south-west side is bivallatc 4m wide and 1m deep and an outer bank up to 2m high and 3m wide. This contains an entrance which was blocked at a later stage in the iron age. This earthwork may have been a cross-ridge dyke before it was incorporated into the hillfort.
An entrance in the middle of the south western side is modern.
A single bank and ditch surmount the sleep, wooded north and east sides. A funnel-shaped entrance in the north-east corner has been, proved by excavation and had been destroyed by fire.
Partial excavation of the site in 1959-60 has showed that an earlier structure existed at the north east entrance, indicated by drystone revetments within the northern rampart. In a second stage the entrance was remodelled and widened.
There was another entrance on the north-west side where four staggered post holes were uncovered as well as a cylindrical cavity 0.66m deep, interpreted as a gate post hole.
The small rectangular earthwork inside the fort marked on some maps as a barrow, is also of iron age date.
Some time in the second century BC the fort came to an end, although why is unknown.

A very interesting site to explore if you can spend a day marching up the steep sides. I would recommend you do this one in the spring or autumn though, as the mosquitoes and thick vegetation can make the whole place seem like a jungle.

Ligneé tumulus

This tumulus lies to the south of the village of Ligné and is sign posted from the village hall.
The village itself is famous for it’s cemetery, which contains various knights graves.

The tumulus mound is approximately 30m in diameter by 3.5m high, surrounded by a large circle of trees.
An entrance passage can be seen which connects to a ruined inner chamber.
Although the site is badly damaged, it is scheduled and will, in time, be excavated and restored, along with many of the other fine barrows in Charente.

Lugbury

Visited this barrow today and found it devoid of plants!
The Elder was cut to the ground and the brambles banished.
The stones looked great and the “Monumental” vibe was very stong.

Havn’t seen the place looking this good for years.

Chance – Feb 2009

Image of Lugbury (Long Barrow) by Chance

Lugbury

Long Barrow

Overall view of the barrow looking west

Visited this barrow today and found it devoid of plants!
The Elder was cut to the ground and the brambles banished

Image credit: Chance - Feb 2009