Chance

Chance

All posts 2,351-2,400 of 2,683 posts
Image of Piggle Dene (Natural Rock Feature) by Chance

Piggle Dene

Natural Rock Feature

In 1644, diarist Richard Symonds described Fyfield as ‘a place so full of grey pibble stone of great bignes as is not usually seen ... they lie so thick as you may go upon them all the way. They call that place the Grey-weathers because afar off they look like a flock of Sheepe.‘

Image credit: Chance - March 2008
Image of Piggle Dene (Natural Rock Feature) by Chance

Piggle Dene

Natural Rock Feature

In 1644, diarist Richard Symonds described Fyfield as ‘a place so full of grey pibble stone of great bignes as is not usually seen ... they lie so thick as you may go upon them all the way. They call that place the Grey-weathers because afar off they look like a flock of Sheepe.‘

Image credit: Chance - March 2008
Image of Piggle Dene (Natural Rock Feature) by Chance

Piggle Dene

Natural Rock Feature

In consequence of a recent change of ownership.. there is every probability that the work of breaking up the Sarsens will be undertaken on a greatly extended scale.. the Grey Wethers in Pickle Dean and Lockeridge Dean would be the first to go, owing to their situation adjacent to high roads – while for the same reason their disappearance would be a greater loss to the public than the disappearance of those in more remote parts of the Downs.

Image credit: Chance - March 2008
Image of Piggle Dene (Natural Rock Feature) by Chance

Piggle Dene

Natural Rock Feature

Piggle Dene stones were bought by the National Trust in 1907.

In 1644, diarist Richard Symonds described Fyfield as ‘a place so full of grey pibble stone of great bignes as is not usually seen ... they lie so thick as you may go upon them all the way. They call that place the Grey-weathers because afar off they look like a flock of Sheepe.‘

Image credit: Chance - March 2008
Image of Avebury (Stone Circle) by Chance

Avebury

Stone Circle

An image from a much changed Avebury. The “Druid Stones” in this picture are stone number 44 and the remaining portal stone from the Northern entrance, number 46 – The Swindon Stone.

Image of Round Hill Tump (Round Barrow(s)) by Chance

Round Hill Tump

Round Barrow(s)

The base of Round Hill Tump has seen much disturbance due to a colony of badgers. Something the local farmer is attempting to rectify by the construction of a heavy duty fence.

Image credit: Chance - Aug 2008

Round Hill Tump

Field Notes

Round Hill Tump – ST 6900 5617 – Aug 2008

Ordnance Survey Explorer Map 142 – Scale 1:25000
Shepton Mallet & Mendip Hills East inc. Frome & Midsomer Norton.
ISBN 978-0-319-46154-9

After looking at both references to this site on TMA database, I feel this one is the most appropiate in terms of name and grid reference, although Rhiannon’s Camerton Round Barrow site No.5698, is older.
Like a lot of ancient sites, it has become the boundary marker because it was here before anything else.

As to the name, I’m going for Round Hill Tump, as it lies in a field called the “Tump Ground”. Rhiannon’s name of “Camerton Round Barrow” is a little confusing. The village of Camerton lies 2 miles north of the site, on the other side of the Roman Road, the Fosse Way (the modern A367). The area was partially excavated by W.J. Wedlake and a report was published in 1958 entitled ‘Excavations at Camerton 1926-56’. The nearest village is Clandon. The whole hill is called Round Hill and the course of the Fosse Way makes straight for the top of it.

My route to the site was along the bottom of the valley from Stoney Littleton Long Barrow and the Sustrans cyclepath href=“https://www.bathnes.gov.uk/BathNES/transportandstreets/walkingandcycling/cycling/NCN24.htm”>The Colliers Way – National Cycle Network Route 24.

From the middle of Radstock, I took the Bath Old Road, behind the museum and up the side of Round Hill. The road is very steep to begin with but once past the sports field, it levels off a bit.
The “Tump” is easily spotted from the road and a gate was conveniently placed for access.

As to the mound itself, it is unusual. It certainly isn’t your average bowl or bell type of round barrow and it didn’t seem to have any form of ditch or bank (although there probably was one formed to create the structure. Maybe it was such a bowl barrow to begin with and it was added to at a later date. Colt Hoare also noted such strange barrows and called them “Conical Barrows”. The only other one I have encountered like this is known as Mount Wood and lies on the Marlborough Downs near Yatesbury.

I think the TMA Eds will probably re-list it as a disputed antiquity after reading this, although I do hope they find the time to merge it with Rhiannon’s Camerton Round Barrow, site No.5698.

Miscellaneous

Musée des Tumulus de Bougon
Barrow / Cairn Cemetery

The Bougon museum, opened in 1993, is a modern structure, incorporating an ancient priory. The exhibition is focused on prehistory in general and the Neolithic in particular. It includes the excavated material from the site, but also replicas of a room in the Neolithic settlement of Catalhoyuk (Turkey) and of the passage tomb art from Gavrinis (Brittany).

The museum also has an outside area with displays of experimental archaeology, including reconstructions concerned with prehistoric methods for the transport and construction of megalithic monuments.

Miscellaneous

Bougon Tumuli
Barrow / Cairn Cemetery

The Tumulus of Bougon or Necropolis of Bougon (French: “Tumulus de Bougon”, “Nécropole de Bougon”) is a group of five Neolithic monuments (barrows or burial mounds) located near La-Mothe-Saint-Héray, between Exoudon and Pamproux in Poitou-Charentes, France.

Their discovery in 1840 raised great scientific interest. To protect the monuments, the site was acquired by the department of Deux-Sèvres in 1873. Excavations resumed in 1968. The oldest structures of this prehistoric monument date to 4,800 BC.

Image of Tumulus du Montioux (Chambered Tomb) by Chance

Tumulus du Montioux

Chambered Tomb

The overall view of the site with tumulus 2 in the foreground. The completely rebuilt chamber 1 is shown next to the partially rebuilt chamber 2. The excavated but not re-built areas of chambers 3 and 4 can be seen on the far left.

Image credit: Chance - Sep 2008