Chance

Chance

Miscellaneous 1,001-1,050 of 1,149 miscellaneous posts

Miscellaneous

Ballard Down Barrows
Round Barrow(s)

Details of Pond Barrow on Pastscape

A Bronze Age pond barrow, the northern most barrow in a group of three round barrows situated on Ballard Down. The barrow survives as an earthwork comprising a circular depression 10 metres in diameter and 0.5 metres deep, surrounded by an outer bank one metre wide and 0.2 metres high. In 1967 finds including pottery, burnt bone and shale were recovered from the area of the outer bank by E.E Harrison. The finds are held in the Dorset Museum.

(Centred SZ 039813) Tumuli (NR) (three shown) (1)
SZ 03988132. A pond barrow with enclosed area of 33 feet in diameter by 2 1/2 feet deep and outer bank 12 feet wide x 1 foot high. Excavated by J.H. Austen in 1857 but with no result. (2-5)
Grass covered pond barrow consisting of a circular hollow 11.5 metres in diameter and 1.2 metres deep. (6)
Pond barrow, recently ploughed. Pieces of pottery, burnt bone and shale were picked up from the surface in the southeast sector of the barrow by E.E. Harrison in 1967. From their position they appeared to have come from the bank of the barrrow. (7)
SZ 03988133. A circular depression, 33 feet across and 3 feet deep with an irregular bank is more likely to be a pond than a pond barrow (but see Authority 7). (8)
No change to Authority 8 but National Grid Reference should read – SZ 03988132; Barrow on grassland, in good condition, 117m OD. Surveyed at 1:2500. (9)
One of a group of three round barrows situated on Ballard Down. The pond barrow is the northern most barrow of the three and survives as a circular depression 10 metres in diameter and 0.5 metres deep, surrounded by an outer bank one metre wide and 0.2 metres high. In 1967 finds including pottery, burnt bone and shale were recovered from the area of the outer bank by E.E Harrison. The finds are held in the Dorset Museum. (10)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” Prov Edition
( 2) General reference – Austen J.H. Purbeck Paper, 161-163
( 3) by Charles Warne 1866 The Celtic tumuli of Dorset : an account of personal and other researches in the sepulchral aounds of the Durotriges Nos 94-95b
( 4) General reference – Crana Britannica. 1865, 2 p45
( 5) by L V Grinsell 1959 Dorset barrows – Page(s)133, 172
( 6) Field Investigators Comments – F1 JR 01-SEP-1952
( 7) Proceedings of the Dorset Natural History and Archaeological Society – E E Harrison and J B Calkin 89 (1967) Page(s)140-41
( 8) by Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 Inventory of historical monuments in the county of Dorset: Vol 2, South-East (in 3 parts) – Nos 89-90 Page(s)453
( 9) Field Investigators Comments – F2 CFW 16-AUG-1985
( 10) Scheduled Monument Notification – 25-JUN-2001

Miscellaneous

King Barrow (Coneybury Hill)
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A large Bronze Age bowl barrow on Coneybury Hill, listed by Grinsell as Amesbury 23. According to Stukeley, excavation in 1722 recovered a “very large brass weapon of twenty pounds weight, like a pole-axe”. Grinsell suggested that this might have been a large halberd similar to one found at Leubingen, Germany. An excavation in the mid-19th century by Thurnam was apparently unproductive. A large whetstone in Salisbury Museum is labelled “King Barrow”, presumably Amesbury 23. A bronze dagger and two shale cups within the same museum are also suggested to come from the same barrow. A bronze flanged axe is less certainly associated. The barrow is extant as an earthwork mound 3.9 metres high and around 30 metres in diameter. Scheduled.

(SU 13554137) Tumulus (AT). (1)
Amesbury 23. “King Barrow”, a bowl barrow 99 ft in diameter and 10 ft high. According to Stukeley, ‘a very large brass weapon of twenty pounds weight, like a pole-axe’ was found in it in 1722,? an all bronze halberd, as from Leubingen. A whetstone about 12 inches long from the barrow is in Salisbury Museum. (2)
Amesbury 23. A bowl barrow 3.9m high; slightly oval probably because of ploughing. Published 1:2500 survey revised. (3)
Originally recorded as Amesbury 23 by Goddard. (4) The finds, a flanged axe, hone, dagger and two shale cups are thought to have come from this barrow. They were part of the Job Edwards Collection presented to Salisbury Museum in 1898. (5)
SU 13544139. King Barrow scheduling amended. (7)
The barrow is visible as an earthwork on aerial photographs, and has been mapped by both RCHME’s Salisbury Plain Training area NMP and EH’s Stonehenge WHS Mapping Project. (8-9)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1961
( 2) edited by R B Pugh and Elizabeth Crittall 1957 A history of Wiltshire: volume 1, part 1 The Victoria history of the counties of England LV Grinsell: Archaeological Gazetteer Page(s)150
(4) The Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine EH Goddard: A list of prehistoric, Roman and pagan Saxon antiquities in the county of Wiltshire... 38, 1913-14 Page(s)167
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 ANK 21-DEC-70
( 5) by C N Moore and M J Rowlands 1972 Bronze Age metalwork in Salisbury Museum Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum occasional publications Page(s)43-4
( 6) by Frances Blore, et al. 1995 Archaeological assessment of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and its surrounding landscape Record number 804 Page(s)271
( 7) Scheduled Monument Notification EH Scheduling amendment, 05-APR-1995
( 8) Vertical aerial photograph reference number NMR SU 1342/52 (CCC 8622/SACA445) 07-NOV-1923
( 9) Oblique aerial photograph reference number NMR SU 1341/16 (1865/173) 12-NOV-1980

Miscellaneous

Stand Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Earthwork remains of a Bronze Age bowl barrow.

(SY 84299531) Tumulus (NR) (1)
Turf-coverd bowl barrow, 18.0m diameter and 1.2m high with no trace of ditch has been surveyed at SY 84269532. Known locally as ‘Stand Barrow’. (2)
Approx SY 84329532. Prominent rise (listed under bowl barrows) ?22 paces diameter and ?3ft high marked as Stand Barrow on Isacc Taylor’s estate map 1777 (Drax Ms in Dorset Co Museum). (3)
SY 8429531. Stand Barrow, bowl barrow, 57ft diameter and 1ft high, ploughed and situated on the summit of a small knoll. (4)
SY 84269533. ‘Stand Barrow’ (name in local use), a bowl barrow diameter 20.0 metres approximately, height 0.8 metres.
Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1968
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F1 JR 16-SEP-52
( 3) General reference Dorset Barrows 1959 89 (L V Grinsell)
( 4) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 436 No 82
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 15-MAY-81

Miscellaneous

Muddox Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Muddox Barrow (site of)

Approx. SY 852966. Muddox Barrow (site of) Destroyed. Not shown on OS 1” 1st Ed. A flat bronze axe was found near this barrow. (see SY 89 NE 10). (1)
Perambulation of the area revealed no trace of a barrow and local enquiries produced negative information. (2)
Muddox barrow (about SY 852966), now destroyed, is shown on I. Taylor’s estate map of 1777. (3)
There is no indication of a barrow in the vicinity of SY 852966 and nothing is visible on Air photographs (a). (4)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1a) General reference P Dorset NH and AS 21 1900 p 50
( 1) General reference Dorset Barrows Mss 1935-54 (L V Grinsell)
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F1 GCS 15-NOV-54
( 3) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 435
( 4a) General reference APs (OS 80/021 164-5 223-4 18.4.80)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F2 NJA 03-JUN-81

Miscellaneous

Hawke Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Bowl barrow 320m east of Bere Down Farm, on south facing slope of Bere Down and is part of a group of seven. The barrow is 22m in diameter, c.1.5m high and surrounded by a buried ditch c.2m wide. It was partly excavated in the 19th century.

(SY 84339685) Tumulus (NR) (1)
A grass-covered ditchless bowl barrow, 23.0m diameter and 1.6m high with a slight central excavation. A ‘Celtic’ type lynchet merges with the barrow on its south east side. A small Bronze Age sherd was found in a mole-hill a few metres south west of the barrow. (2)
SY 84349684 Ditched bowl barrow, 74ft diameter and 7ft high marked as “Hawks Barrow” on Isaac Taylor’s map 1777. It lies on a flat-topped spur, just below a ‘Celtic’ field lynchet (see SY 89 NW 33) and has been disturbed in the centre. A collared urn, in Dorset County Museum, apparently came from this barrow (a). (3-4)
SY 84339685. Bowl barrow, diameter 23.0 metres north-west/south-east and 20.5 metres north-east/south-west, height from 2.4 to 4.0 metres maximum. Not ploughed; in good preservation. No visible evidence of a ditch. The name ‘Hawks Barrow’ is not in current use.
Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)
SY 845971. Round Barrows on Bere Down. Scheduled. (Includes this barrow – see illustration). (6 – 7)
SY 84349684. Bere Regis 8. Round barrow listed, information as Authy 3. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1902
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F1 GCS 29-SEP-54
( 3a) General reference P Dorset NH & AS 86 1964 p 115
( 3) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 437 No 112
( 4) General reference Dorset Barrows 1959 88 (L V Grinsell)
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 13-MAY-81
( 6) General reference DOE(IAM) AMs Eng 2 1978 59
( 7) General reference DOE(IAM) Record Form 02.09.60
( 8) General reference Dorset Barrows Supplement 1982 33 (L V Grinsell)

Miscellaneous

Rawles Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Possible barrow placed on a natural rise

(SY 85709620) “Site of “Rawles Barrow” (?Tumulus)“. (1)
SY 85699621. A near circular mound, 27.0 metres, diameter, 0.9 metres high taken to the north. Situated on an eastern slope and under pasture. Possibly a bowl barrow but it has more the appearance of a natural rise. No trace of a ditch or excavation.
No information regarding the name ‘Rawles Barrow’ was obtained during field investigation. (2)
SY 85719621. ‘Rawles Barrow’, (shown on I. Taylor’s estate map 1777), bowl (?) barrow adjoining hedge on west side of road, is now a low oval mound 99ft. by 72ft. and heavily ploughed. (3)
Rawles Barrow (name unconfirmed) is under crop but appears to be the end of a natural ridge, which may of course have once supported a barrow, since destroyed. There is nothing on air photographs (a). (4)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1a) General reference Dorset Co Mus 6”
( 1) General reference Rec 6” (ALF Rivet 21.5.53)
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F1 GCS 15-NOV-54
( 3) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 437 No 113
( 4a) General reference AP’s (OS 80/021 222-3 18.4.80)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F2 NJA 28-MAY-81

Miscellaneous

Bere Down
Long Barrow

Details of Long Barrow on Pastscape

A Neolithic long barrow located on Bere Down. The barrow mound measures up to 55 metres by 24 metres and between 0.5 to 0.75 metres high. It is associated with 5 sarsen stones which were discovered during ploughing, and may relate to a chamber within the mound. The barrow was later incorporated into a prehistoric field boundary. Scheduled.

(SY 82989725) Long Barrow (NR) (1)
Long Barrow, possibly chambered (SY 82989725), lies on Bere Down, about 200 ft above Ordnance Datum, just below the crest of a broad chalk ridge, on ground sloping gently to NW, W and S, it is only seen in silhouette at close range from N and S.
On a bearing of 70o, it is 176 ft long, 65 ft wide in the middle where widest, and some 7 ft high at the E end and 6 ft at the W. A slight terrace, some 45 ft wide, parallel to the barrow on the S, probably marks the site of the ditch. The centre of the mound has been cut into from the S and the spine hollowed for 114 ft from the W end. Five sarsen boulders, none more than 2 1/2 ft long and 1 1/4 ft deep, lie scattered, two on the hollowed spine and three in the S excavation where there is a large heap of flints. The barrow was used as a ‘Celtic’ field boundary (see SY 89 NW 12), and lynchets run up to it, crossing the line of any ditch that may have existed on the N. The mound has been damaged by rabbits and ploughing. (2)
SY 829972. Bere Regis long barrow (Wessex No 155). Listed. (3)
Long barrow on Bere Down, ploughed and spread but still visible from a distance, although unsurveyable. (4)
SY 82989725. A long barrow, generally as described by R.C.H.M. (2), appears as a gently-sloping ridge, but from the north where the air photograph (a) shows that the barrow once formed the northern boundary of a field of the prehistoric system (SY 89 NW 12), it merges into the hillside with but a minimum of height (0.1 metres). Its length is now 50.0 metres, its width 15.0 metres maximum, and height from the south (downhill) side 1.2 metres. Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)
The barrow mound now measures a maximum of 55 metres in length, 24 metres in width and between 0.5 to 0.75 metres in height. Scheduling revised 09/03/01. (6)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1968
( 2) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] Pt 3 No 66 Page(s)431
( 3) by Paul Ashbee 1970 The earthen long barrow in Britain : an introduction to the study of the funerary practice and culture of the Neolithic people of the third millennium Page(s)162
( 4) Oral information, correspondence (not archived) or staff comments
( 5a) Aerial photograph APs(OS/80/021/161-2 18.4.80)
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F1 JGB 15-MAY-81
( 6) Scheduled Monument Notification EH Scheduled Monument Revision, 09-MAR-2001

Miscellaneous

Dead Woman’s Stone
Standing Stone / Menhir

Details of Stone on Pastscape

‘Dead Woman’s Stone’, possible standing stone of unknown date, now lost or destroyed.

Dead Woman’s Stone (NAT) (SY 82209164) (1)
Dead Woman’s Stone shown on OS cannot be traced in heathland now devasted by tanks. (2)
Shown as The Dead Woman on Tithe Map 1839. (3)
Since the 1960s the site has been used as a tank raining area, and latterly as a conifer plantation. There is no sign of the stone and it is presumed to be lost or destroyed. Ground photo with archive report. (4)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1902
( 2) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 513 No 65
( 3) General reference EPNS Dorset 1 1977 290 (A D Mills)
( 4) English Heritage Alternative Action Report KC, MPPA, Dec-2001

Miscellaneous

How Hill
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A bowl barrow situated on a west facing slope immediately to the north of the A11 trunk road. The barrow is visible as an earthern mound, standing to a height of approximately 2.6 metres with a maximum diameter of 35 metres. A hollow on the eastern side of the mound, measuring about 10 metres wide at the base by 5 metres wide at the top and approximately 1 metre deep, is thought to be the result of an unrecorded antiquarian excavation. A letter from WG Clarke to Cyril Fox, dated 1923, states that ‘a cinerary urn has been found there and broken up’. Scheduled.

(TL 75987626) How Hill (NAT) Tumulus (NR) (1)
“There is no record that this tumulus has been examined, beyond a note from the late W.G Clarke, preserved in the Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Cambridge, saying that a ‘cinerary urn had been found there and broken up’“. (2)
A bowl barrow at TL 75987626 2.0m in height and 34.0m in diameter. A partly refilled excavation trench, circa 3.0m wide, runs east to west across the mound. There are no traces of a ditch.
Published 1:2500 survey revised. (3)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) 6” 1903-50
( 2) Proceedings of the Cambridge Antiquarian Society 48 (1954-6)
( 3) Field Investigators Comments 13/01/1972
( 4) Scheduled Monument Notification 23/02/1998

Miscellaneous

Fox Low
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Bronze Age round barrow, visible as an earthwork, believed to have been excavated in 1850. The feature is also visible as an earthwork on air photographs mapped as part of the Derbyshire and Peak District Aggregates Assessment Project. It is still extant on Google.Earth.com 06-SEP-2005 imagery (accessed on 21st September 2009).

[SK 0673 7122] Tumulus [GT] Fox Low [T.I.]. (1)
On 3.6.1850 Bateman examined `the remains on Foxlow Hill, near Buxton, where, in addition to some inconsiderable earthworks, there is the base of a large tumulus, the upper part of which had been removed to within a few inches of the rock’. Human teeth and rats bones were found. (2) This tumulus exists as shown. (3)
A cairn with a maximum height of 1.7m. The feature is crossed by a broken dry stone wall and there is a sheepfold adjacent to the north-west face. (The above reference to “inconsiderable earthworks” is probably an allusion to the extensive quarrying which occupies Harpur Hill. No archaeological vestiges were noted). Cairn resurveyed at 1:1250. (4)
No change. (5) SK 067712. Fox Low round cairn. Scheduled. (6) Additional reference. (7)
A sub-circular cairn 16m by 14.5m and 1.5m in height, scheduled as a bowl barrow. (8)
The bowl barrow is also visible as an earthwork on air photographs mapped as part of the Derbyshire and Peak District Aggregates Assessment Project. It is still extant on Google.Earth.com 06-SEP-2005 imagery (accessed on 21st September 2009).
(9-10)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1955
( 2) General reference Ten Years’ Diggings... 1861 p.66 (T. Bateman)
( 3) General reference OS 513 (S.S. Reviser, 16.8.49)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 FC 17-MAY-65
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 FDC 05-APR-66
( 6) General reference DOE (IAM) Anc Mons Eng 3 1978 23
( 7) General reference Marsden BM 1977 Burial Mounds of Derbyshire 26 Priv Pub
( 8) General reference English Heritage, Scheduling Amendment, 14-APR-1992
( 9) Vertical aerial photograph reference number NMR RAF/CPE/UK/2598 4169 16-APR-1948
(10) Oblique aerial photograph reference number NMR SK 0671/4 NMR 17213/13 21-JAN-1999

Miscellaneous

Fox Howe
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A Bronze Age round barrow, known as Fox Howe. The barrow mound measures 20 metres in diameter and 2.2 metres high. Scheduled.

SE 90259096. Fox Howe (NR). (1)
Fox Howe – a round barrow with a large central pit. Unplanted. Seen by J.G.R 3.2.55. (2)
Round cairn 9 feet high, 75 feet diameter. (3)
Within an area of afforestation but unplanted, a heather-clad round barrow, 21.0 metres in diameter and 2.0 metres high with only slight disturbance at the centre. There is no apparent evidence to support the DOE’s classification of the feature as a cairn. Published survey (25”) revised. (4) SE 903909. Fox Howe round cairn. Scheduled. (5)
SE 90259096. A Bronze Age round barrow, known as Fox Howe. The barrow mound measures 20 metres in diameter and 2.2 metres high. Scheduling amended. (6)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1910-50
( 2) Annotated Record Map Corr 6” (J G Rutter 22.1.58)
( 3) General reference DOE(IAM) (Draft List 1971)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 DS 17-JUL-72
( 5) by Department of the Environment, Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings London 1978 List of ancient monuments in England: Volume 1, Northern England; Volume 2, Southern England; Volume 3, East Anglia and the Midlands DOE(IAM) AMs Eng 1 1978 48 Page(s)48
(6) Scheduled Monument Notification EH Scheduling amendment, 11-FEB-2002

Miscellaneous

Fox Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Bronze Age bowl barrow visible as an earthwork and mapped from aerial photographs.

[SU 5071 8308] Fox Barrow [G.T.] (1)
Fox Barrow is a bowl barrow mentioned in an Anglo Saxon charter, and situated at the junction of the Blewbury, Compton and East Ilsley parish boundaries. The mound is thirty paces in diameter, seven feet high and surrounded by a ditch. Scheduled. (2-3) ‘Fox Barrow’ has been spared by ploughing and there is now no trace of a ditch. Published survey (25”) revised. (4)
The barrow is visible as an earthwork on aerial photographs. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) General reference O.S. 6” (Prov.) 1960
( 2) General reference Berks A.J. 40, 1936, 46. (L.V. Grinsell)
( 3) General reference A M S Eng and Wales 1961, 19. (Mow).
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 JP 23-APR-64
( 5) Vertical aerial photograph reference number NMR OS/6431 208 17-MAY-1964

Miscellaneous

End Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A bowl barrow known as the End Barrow, situated on a ridge overlooking the Piddle Valley to the south east. The barrow has a mound composed of sand, earth and turf, with maximum dimensions of 17 metres in diameter and circa 1.8 metres in height. Surrounding the mound is a ditch from which material was quarried during the construction of the monument. The ditch has become infilled over the years, but will survive as a buried feature 2 metres wide. Scheduled.

(SY 8459 9309) End Barrow (Tumulus) (NR) (1)
A very large and high bowl barrow. No other details. (2)
This barrow has a diameter of 14.0 metres and a height of 1.9 metres. It has no ditch and has been slightly mutilated by rabbit burrows. It is heavily overgrown with fern and thorn bushes. A bowl barrow. (3)
SY 8460 9310. End barrow, bowl barrow 57 ft diameter and 8 1/2 ft high, thickly overgrown. (4)
SY 8459 9309. ‘End Barrow’ (name not confirmed) diameter 17.0m, height 2.3m. Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) 6” 1902
( 2) by L V Grinsell 1959 Dorset barrows
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 JR 15-SEP-52
( 4) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] Part 3 Page(s)436
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 06-FEB-81
( 6) Scheduled Monument Notification 12/04/1997

Miscellaneous

Double Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Bronze Age bowl barrow on the western end of a ridge overlooking the Piddle Valley to the south and the Bere Valley to the north. The monument concists of a mound 12m in diameter and 1.8m high surounded by an infilled ditch 1.5m high. Scheduled.

Double Barrow (Tumuli) O.E. (1)
? Possible Long Barrows. (2)
Two bowl barrows, both among firs and dense undergrowth, and both 8ft high. [a] SY 8208 9452; b) SY 8209 9452] (3)
Only one tumulus is surveyed and worthy of record at this site, it is situated at SY 8208 9452 and has the following measurements:- Diam. E/W 14.5m N/S 15.0m. Height 2.0m no trace of ditch, this mound is situated on steep N-S natural slope, the tumulus has weathered to the slope and measurements are accurate only to te nearest 0.5m. To the west of this mound the natural ground contour drops steeply in a precipitous way. I consider this wholly natural feature has been recorded in error as a second tumulus, however the whole area is densely over-grown with trees and thick undergrowth, burrowing by rabbits, and a great amount of soil strip have disfigured the original outline, and without excavation it is impossible to determine the original condition of this site. Re. Auth 2. this is not a long barrow, the a/m tumulus is complete within itself and is obviously a bowl. (4)
Surveyed. There is now only a single barrow situated on a small abrupt natural spur, and there is nothing on the ground to
suggest that there was ever anything more. Dimensions and description are as given in 4. (5)
SY 82089453. Double Barrow, a bowl barrow about 40ft diameter and about 8ft high near the west end of a spur. No evidence of a contigous barrow. (6)
SY 821945. Double Barrow, round barrow. Scheduled. (7)
SY 82099453. No change.
Re-surveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1902
( 2) General reference OGS Crawford. Undated Rec. 6”
( 3) General reference L.V. Grinsell’s ‘List of Dorset Barrows’ (Unpublished)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 FDC 09-JAN-53
( 5) Large Scale / Small Scale Map Revisers Comment SS Rev GSL 25-SEP-61
( 6) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] part 3, No 61 Page(s)434
( 7) by Department of the Environment, Ancient Monuments and Historic Buildings London 1978 List of ancient monuments in England: Volume 1, Northern England; Volume 2, Southern England; Volume 3, East Anglia and the Midlands Page(s)59
( 8) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 12-FEB-81

Miscellaneous

Black Hill
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Bronze Age bowl barrow reused as the the meeting place of the Domesday Hundreds of Bere. It is situated on a spur overlooking the Bere Valley to the east. The monument concists of a mound 16m in diameter and 2.2m high, it is surounded by an infilled ditch 1.5m wide.

(SY 8446 9377) Hundred Barrow (Tumulus) (NR) (1)
Large bowl barrow, no details. (2)
This barrow has a diameter of 18.0 metres and a height of 2.6 metres. It has no surrounding ditch and is covered with thorn bushes, brambles and ferns. No visible trace of mutilation. A bowl barrow. (3)
SY 8446 9378. Hundred Barrow, bowl barrow, 58ft diameter and 7ft high damaged by rabbits on summit of small spur. (4)
Hundred Barrow was the meeting place of the old Domesday hundred of Bere. In the 12th century, a smaller hundred named after the barrow, i.e. Barrow (or Hundreds Barrow) was created out of the original Bere hundred. (5)
SY 8446 9377. Hundred Barrow. Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (6)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1902.
( 2) General reference Dorset Barrows Ms 1935-54 (L V Grinsell)
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 JR 15-SEP-52
( 4) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] pt 3, No. 76. Page(s)436
( 5) English Place-Name Society : the survey of English place-names [county volumes] Dorset 1, 1977 (A D Mills) Page(s)278, 288
( 6) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 06-FEB-81
( 7) General reference English Heritage Schedule Entry 17/4/1997

Miscellaneous

Bolton’s Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

Five bowl barrows including Bolton’s Barrow on a west facing slope overlooking the Bere Valley. Three barrows are 30-32m across and up to 0.6m high. One is 23m across and 0.45m high. The other is known from air photos and is 18m across.

(SY 86099642) Bolton’s Barrow (Tumulus) (NR) (1)
(’A’ – SY 86179641) “A single circular cropmark in clover Sept 1948”.
(’B’ – SY 86129635) “Double concentric circle visible as cropmark”.
(’C’ – SY 86099642) Bolton’s Barrow. “Cropmark circle visible around barrow”. (2)
‘A’ – Not visible in area under weeds.
‘B’ – Probable bowl barrow visible on ploughland as a vague mound, 28.0m diameter, 0.3m high to the south with possible ditch.
‘C’ – Bowl barrow, 30m north-south, 37m east-west and 0.6m high taken to the east, appears to be spread on the downhill side. No sign of ditch.
‘D’ – A near circular mound – possibly a bowl barrow, averaging 32m diameter and 0.6m high with no indication of ditch is visible at SY 86009640. (3)
‘C’-(SY 86099642) Bolton’s Barrow (NR)
‘D’-(SY 86009640) Tumulus (NR) (4)
‘B’ – (114) – SY 86129635. Ditched bowl barrow, 69ft diameter and 1ft high. Two concentric ditches visible as crop-marks measure 31ft diameter and 6ft wide (inner) and 70ft diameter and 7ft wide (outer).
‘C’ – (115) – SY 86099642. Bolton’s Barrow, a ditched bowl barrow, 80ft diameter and 1ft high with a 12ft wide ditch visible as a crop-mark.
‘A’ – (116) – SY 86179643. Barrow? Visible only as a crop-mark circle, 66ft diameter.
(Barrow ‘D’ has been omitted from the RCHM inventory for some reason). (5)
“SY 861964. Bolton’s Barrow, round barrow. Scheduled”. (6)
The barrows are presently under crop and inaccessible.
‘A’. Not visible, not discernibe on air photographs (a) and not mentioned by Grinsell (b).
‘B’. Not visible, though discernible on (a) and described by (b).
‘C’. Visible in crop, discernible on (a) and described by (b).
‘D’. Visible in crop, discernible on (a) but not described by (b).
‘C’ and ‘D’ are retained on M.S.D. as described by Authority (3). (7)
SY 86059639 Three bowl barrows 515m SE of East Field Farm, the easternmost known as Bolton’s Barrow. The barrows each have a mound composed of earth, flint and chalk with maximum dimensions of between 30m-32m in diameter and between c.0.35-0.6m high. (8)
SY 86119633 Bowl barrow 600m SE of East Field Farm. The barrow survives as an earthwork 23m in diameter and c.0.45m high. (9)
SY 86169642 Bowl barrow 600m ESE of East Field Farm. This barrow is only visible on aerial photographs and has a diameter of 18m. (10)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) 6” 1902
( 2) Externally held archive reference Pte 6” (Dorset County Museum)
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 GCS 15-NOV-54
( 4) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) 6” 1963
( 5) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] Pt 3 Nos 114-116 Page(s)437
( 6) General reference DOE (IAM) Ancient Monuments England 1977 Page(s)60
( 7) Field Investigators Comments F2 NJA 28-MAY-81
( 7a) Aerial photograph (OS 80/021 220-2 18.4.80)
( 7b) by L V Grinsell 1959 Dorset barrows Page(s)88
( 8) Scheduled Monument Notification 17-MAR-97
( 9) Scheduled Monument Notification 17-MAR-97
(10) Scheduled Monument Notification 17-MAR-97

Miscellaneous

Yon Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Yon Barrow

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A bowl barrow with a mound composed of earth, sand and turf, with maximum dimensions of 15m in diameter and c2.45m in height. The mound is surrounded by a quarry ditch which is visible as an earthwork.

(SY 86379294) Yon Barrow (Tumulus) (NR) (1)
A large ditched bowl tumulus. No other detail given, apart from height of 10 ft. (2)
This barrow has a diameter of 16.0 metres and a height of 3.1 metres. A surrounding ditch has an average width of 2.5 metres and an average depth of 0.4 metres. It has a pointed top and has no trace of mutilation. Covered with heather and young coniferous trees. A bowl barrow. (3)
SY 86379294. Yon barrow (Yarn Barrow, 1777) is a ditched bowl, 45ft. diameter and 8ft. high on Lockyer’s Hill now planted
with conifers. (4)
Yon Barrow (name not confirmed), remains as described and measured by Auth (3); there are slight indications of an excavation on the east side. See ground photograph. Revised at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1902
( 2) General reference Grinsell LV Dorset Barrows Ms 1935-54
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 JR 15-SEP-52
( 4) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 436 No 73
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 NJA 30-MAR-81
( 6) General reference English Heritage Schedule Entry 13/11/1996

Miscellaneous

Henbury Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A bowl barrow composed of earth, flint and chalk with maximum dimensions of 15m in diameter and c1.5m in height. A ditch suround the mound which has been part infilled but remains visible as an earthwork.
(SY 94899821) Henbury Barrow. Tumulus (NR) (1)
A bowl barrow. Diameter 16 paces. Height 7ft. Ditched covered with dense vegetation. For name see Fagersten. (2-3)
A bowl barrow with a mutilated ditch. The mound has a diameter of 14.0m., and a height of 2.0m., it is covered with trees and
brambles. On the east, south-west and south quadrants the ditch is 5.0m. wide and 0.3m. deep; elsewhere there are only unsurveyable traces. (4)
SY 94899821. Henbury Barrow, bowl barrow 47ft. diameter and 7ft. high situated on a flat-topped spur. Overgrown. (5)
(SY 94899821) Henbury Barrow (NR) (6)
SY 949980. Henbury Barrow, round barrow – scheduled.(7)
SY 94899821. Henbury Barrow (name in local usage) a bowl barrow as described. Faint traces of a ditch (not surveyable).
Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1929
( 2) General reference Dorset Barrows MSS 1934-55 (L V Grinsell)
( 3) General reference Place Names of Dorset 1933 114-5 (Anton Fagersten)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 NVQ 24-NOV-55
( 5) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 446 No 37
( 6) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1963
( 7) General reference DOE (IAM) List Anc Mons 2 1978 66
( 8) Field Investigators Comments F2 JGB 19-FEB-81

Miscellaneous

Windmill Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of barrow on Pastscape

A possible bowl barrow recorded in 1955 by the Ordnance Survey as a tree-covered mound 33 metres in diameter and 2 metres high. A large depression in the top measures 10 metres in diameter and is circa 0.4 metres deep. This depression is, according to RCHME, embanked. The Ordnance Survey noted that, despite the name, there was no evidence at the site for the mound having been a windmill mound. However, RCHME regard the monument as almost certainly a windmill mound rather than a round barrow. Nonetheless, it is scheduled as the latter.

(SY 93729773) Windmill Barrow. Tumulus (NR) (1)
A bowl barrow, diameter 37 paces, height 12ft. covered in firs. Hollow in the centre. Height is about 7ft. from south 12ft. from north. (2)
A bowl barrow with no visible ditch. The tree-covered mound has a diameter of 33.0m., and a height of 2.0m. The hollow in the centre is a depression 10.0m. in diameter and 0.4m. deep. In spite of its name, no evidence of a windmill being at the site was found during recording or field investigation. (3)
SY 93729774. ‘Windmill Barrow’ probable windmill mound of pear-shaped form with diameters, 107ft. west to east and 94ft. north to south, and a height of about 11ft. There is an embanked circular depression about 45ft. diameter on the top of the mound which is situated on the spine of a slight ridge at about 250ft. OD. (4-5)
SY 937977. Windmill Barrow, round barrow. Scheduled. (6)
Windmill Barrow (name confirmed) remains as described by Auths 4 and 5. It is scheduled as a barrow, but R.C.H.M. believe it to be a windmill mound. No additional observations can be made to resolve the difference, except that it seems large for a windmill mound. On the Tithe Map the area is called “Fortune Close”. Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (7)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1929
( 2) General reference Dorset Barrows MSS 1934-55 (L V Grinsell)
( 3) Field Investigators Comments F1 NVQ 24-NOV-55
( 4) Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England) 1970 An inventory of historical monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume two : south-east [in three parts] No. 38 Page(s)482
( 5) Notes and queries for Somerset and Dorset No 11 31, 1980 Page(s)14
( 6) General reference Dept Of Environment (Insp Ancient Mons) Ancient Monuments of England, 1977, 66
( 7) Field Investigators Comments F3 JGB 19-FEB-81
( 7a) Externally held archive reference Tithe Map and Award 1839

Miscellaneous

Povington Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

(SY 88048213) Povington Barrow (NR) (1)
The discovery of a Late Bronze Age bucket-shaped urn with cremation at Povington Barrow in 1937 was the result of a salvage operation. The urn was standing on its base at the extreme edge of the barrow, apparently on the turf line on which this had originally been built. This suggests that it may have been one of a number of burials set in a circle at the edge of the mound, later than a secondary interment. The urn itself had been covered by a small cairn of local flints. The cremated bones were in a very fragmentary state but no other pottery or finds were discovered. (2)

Miscellaneous

Water Barrows
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Bowl barrow and possible Bell barrow

(’A’ – SY 86528175; ‘B’ – SY 86558179) Water Barrows (Tumuli) (NR) (1)
‘A’ – Large bowl barrow (no dimensions given).
‘B’ – Bell barrow, the berm of which is clear on the west but poor on the east with a road abutting the barrow on the north east. The ditch is filled with reeds and waterlogged in wet weather. (2)
The ‘Water Barrows’ lie on almost level ground about 220 ft. OD and comprise:
‘A’ – (36) SY 86538176. Bowl barrow, very irregular but 3 1/2ft. high.
‘B’ – (37) – SY 86558180. Bell (?) barrow, about 88ft. diameter including apparent berm on the south-east andand 9 1/2ft. high. The ditch is 12ft. wide, and 2 1/2ft. deep on all sides but the north where it is cut by the road. Much disturbed, especially in the centre. (3) SY 865817. Water Barrows, round barrows. Scheduled. (4) Water Barrows (name not confirmed).
‘A’ SY 86521875. Bowl barrow, diameter 22.0m., height 1.0m. Ploughed over.
‘B’ SY 86558179. Bell Barrow, diameter overall 38.0m. including ditch 3.5m. wide and 0.5m. deep. Height of mound 2.9m. The berm is obscured by slumping and mutilation. Resurveyed at 1:2500 on M.S.D. (5)

Miscellaneous

Icen Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Icen Barrow – Icen Barrow, Middle Bronze Age urn found

(SY 92188384) Icen Barrow (NR) (1)
Icen barrow, very large truncated bowl barrow. (2)
A small fragment of a Middle Bronze Age urn, seen in 1940 in the offices of Pike’s clay works at Furzebrook (SY 932840)
probably came from the Icen barrow. (3)
Icen barrow, a damaged bowl barrow, probably ditched, on an almost level site on Creech Heath, is 56 feet in diameter by 5
feet high. A Bronze Age urn was found in it. (4)
SY 922839. Icen Barrow, round barrow. Scheduled. Dorset 571. (5)
SY 92208383. Church Knowle 1. Icen Barrow listed, details as above. (6-7)
This extensively mutilated bowl barrow lies on the edge of a conifer plantation and is now generally inaccessible because
of dense vegetation cover. A well-worn path follows much of the circumference of the mound through the undergrowth so the
suggestion (4) that the barrow was ditched could not be verified under present conditions. Published 1:2500 survey accepted.
A prominent gorse-covered rise approximately 15.0m to the east of the barrow and separated by a wide cutting may prove to be a second barrow but again the mound was inaccessible because of vegetation cover. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1925
( 2a) General reference Dorset Barros ms (L V Grinsell)
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F1 FDC 25-OCT-51
( 3) General reference P Dorset NH & AS 81 1959 121 (J B Chalkin)
( 4) General reference RCHM Dorset 2 pt 3 1970 442 No 45
( 5) General reference DOE(IAM) AMs England 1977 62
( 6) General reference Dorset Barrows 1959 101 (LV Grinsell)
( 7) General reference Dorset Barrows Supplement 1982 37 (LV Grinsell)
( 8) Field Investigators Comments F2 MJF 30-APR-86

Miscellaneous

Drinking Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

(SY 90698313) Drinking Barrow (NR) (1)
‘Drinking Barrow’, a bowl barrow at the north corner of Great Plantation, is oval in plan, 45 feet east to west by about 54 feet north to south, and 4 feet high. There is no surrounding ditch, that about 6 feet from the base on the west being part of an abandoned system of copse banks and ditches, and a depression along the east side being a disused track. (2)
SY 90698313. Steeple 2. Drinking Barrow, bowl barrow listed with reference to RCHM. Grinsell notes that it is probably so-called from the ditch being waterlogged in wet weather. (4)
This round barrow is situated on high ground in a dense unmanaged conifer platation near the edge of the army firing range.
It is rather spread being up to 18.7m across and because it has been positioned on a slight slope it varies from 0.7m to 1.4m in height. This sloping site may accont for the vaguely oval shape.
The other banks and ditches noted by the RCHM (2) remain clearly evident. Grinsells explanation for the name of the barrow is rather odd as there is no apparent ditch.

Miscellaneous

Three Lords Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

A bowl barrow with a mound composed of earth, sand and turf, with a maximum diameter of 20m and a maximum height of c1.5m. This is surrounded by a quarry ditch which survives as a buried feature.

(SY 91468474) Three Lords’ Barrow (Tumulus) (NR) (1) Three Lords’ Barrow (on meeting place of 4 boundaries, and doubtless at one time on meeting place of 3, hence the name) Large Bowl Barrow. (2) The barrow is spread, with no trace of a ditch. Diameter 22.0 metres; height 1.8 metres. Grass and gorse covered, with no sign of mutilation on top except for a boundary stone. A bowl barrow. (3)

Miscellaneous

King’s Forest Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Bronze Age bowl barrow on a low hill in the King’s Forest. The mound is roughly circular and stands 1.2m high and 32m in diameter. No apparent disturbance. Scheduled.

TL 80617292 Barrow. (1)
Mound shown but not described on OS 25”. (2)
Visible on OS AP. (3)

A bowl barrow situated on level sandy soil covered by mature coppiced elms and surrounded by recently afforested land. It measures approximately 32.0 m in diameter and 1.6 m high with no visible ditch. The northern half of the mound has been truncated by ploughing but the top shows no signs of disturbance. Publishd 25” survey revised. (4)
This barrow was not located during field investigation of the area by OS Field Reviser. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) General reference Suffolk Sites and Monuments Record West Stow 13
( 2) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 25” CSL
( 3) Aerial photograph AP (OS 76/060/226)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 PAS 28-SEP-77
( 5) Scheduled Monument Notification 10-Jun-1998

Miscellaneous

King's Low and Queen's Low
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

[SJ 96342389] TUMULUS [O.E.]. (1)
Nicholls mentions two barrows named ‘King’s Low’ and ‘Queen’s Low’ on Tixall Heath. This is probably one of them.
[See also SJ 92 SE 1]. (2)
“Lower Hanyards”, Barrow, 65’ diam. and 6’ high. (3)
Ploughed down bowl barrow, 26 m. in average diam. & 0.6m. high. No visible ditch. Under pasture. This feature is shown as a pit (slopes reversed) on O.S. 6”. (4)
This is Queen’s Low. The authority for the name is Hardwood’s Eardswick, 1844, p.70. (5)
This barrow has been further reduced by ploughing and is now 0.3m high. A farm track crosses it, but otherwiseit is under grass. Published survey (1:2500) correct. (6)
(SJ 96342390) Queen’s Low(NR). (7)
Tixall:SJ 96342389. Queen’s Low Barrow,badly damaged by ploughing; appears to be c.26m in diameter and 0.5m high.A second barrow knownas King’s Low (SJ 92 SE 1) lies 1km to the west.A third barrow in this area has been mentioned but no trace of it can be found. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1954.
( 2) General reference “History of N. Staffs”, 1933, p.49. (R. Nicholls)
( 3) General reference V.C.H. Staffs, Vol.l, 1908, p.377. (C. Lynam)
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 VJB 24-FEB-58
( 5) General reference Letter (Mr.J.S.Horne, 2.3.58)
( 6) Field Investigators Comments F2 DJC 24-SEP-74
( 7) General reference OS 1:10 000 1973
( 8) General reference W Mid Arch 29 1986 CBA Gp 8 42-5

Miscellaneous

King's Low and Queen's Low
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

King’s Low – Bowl barrow MONUMENT NO. 77395

(SJ 95452373) Tumulus (NR). (1)
Circular mound. 120’ diam. 9’ high. (2)
Two barrows are mentioned by Nicholls as being on Tixall Heath. They are named ‘King’s Low’ and ‘Queen’s Low’ (This is probably one of them. See also SJ 92 SE 9). (3)
This is the barrow known as King’s Low (a). Bowl barrow, 30.0m in diam and 1.8m high. No visible ditch. Tree planted. On the brow of a southern declivity. (4)
No change to previous information. Published survey (1:2500) correct. (5)
King’s Low(NR). (6)

Tixall:SJ 95452373. King’s Low. Barrow c 30.0m in diameter and 1.8m high.Planted with larch trees.A second barrow known as Queen’s Low (SJ 92 SE 9) lies 1km to the east.A third barrow in this area has been mentioned but no trace of it can be found. (7)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1954
( 2) General reference VCH Staffs 1 1908 377
( 3) General reference Hist of N Staffs 1933 49 (R Nicholls)
( 4a) General reference (Mr S Horne Secretary Old Stafford Soc 24 St John’s Rd Rowley Park, Stafford
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 VJB 17-JAN-58
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F2 DJC 24-SEP-74
( 6) General reference OS 1:10 000 1973
( 7) General reference W Mids Arch 29 1986 CBA Gp 8 42-5

Miscellaneous

Carne Beacon
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

A Bronze Age barrow, one of the largest in England and traditionally the burial place of Gerennius (or Gerent) King of Cornwall circa 590 AD. It was excavated in 1855 when it measured 28ft high by 350ft circumferance, and originally must have been larger as part of the north side seems to have been removed. The excavation found a central heap or cairn of stones within which was a cist containing ashes, charcoal and dust but no pottery or other grave goods. Several secondary cremations were also found. Field investigation in 1977 found the barrow to be in good condition but the flat top mutilated by the insertion of a triangulation station and amorphous hollows, and the base cut back by ploughing.

(SW 91263863) Carne Beacon (NAT) Tumulus (NR). (1)
Carne Beacon, traditionally the burial place of Gerennius (or Gereint), King of Cornwall c.590 AD, has been described as one of the biggest Bronze Age barrows in Britain. When excavated in 1855, it measured 28 feet high by 350 feet in circumference, and originally must have been even larger, for a considerable portion of the north side appears to have been removed at some time. Trenching revealed a central heap of stones, or cairn, within which was a cist measuring 4 1/2 ft by 2 ft by 2 1/2 ft, containing ashes, charcoal and dust, but no pottery or other grave goods. Several secondary cremations were found around the centre of the mound, which was restored to its original condition when the excavation was completed. (2-4)
This large round barrow lies on a level plateau at 100m above OD. It is almost circular in plan, measuring 34.0m by 32.0m and stands 5.5m high. The flat top has been mutilated by the insertion of a triangulation station and amorphous hollows, and the base has been cut back by ploughing. Overall the barrow is in good condition. There is no visible trace of a ditch either on the ground or on either the RAF or OS APs. 1:2500 survey revised on AO Model. (5)
The barrow was used as a beacon during the historic period and as an observation post during World War II. The remains of the observation post remain as a concrete platform with traces of a former superstructure. A stone-faced boundary bank runs north-south across the top of the mound. It forms part of a post medieval field system and is believed to be medieval in origin. Aerial photographs indicate traces of two concentric, buried, external ditches, which are thought to completely encircle the mound. (6)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1963
( 2) Annual report of the Royal Institution of Cornwall (J Adams) 37, 1855 Page(s)23-6
( 3) by Christine Hawkridge 1967 Veryan and the Roseland Page(s)2-3
( 4) Nicholas Thomas 1960 A guide to prehistoric England Page(s)54
( 5a) Aerial photograph RAF 106G/UK 1663 12 7 46 3114-5
( 5b) Aerial photograph OS 75/044/044-5
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F1 CC 22-SEP-77
( 6) Scheduled Monument Notification EH Scheduled Monument Revision, 08-MAR-2001 Page(s)6

Miscellaneous

Lilla Howe
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Bronze Age round barrow containing a secondary Anglo-Saxon burial accompanied by grave goods including rings and a brooch. A cross erected to mark the site of later burial, well weathered but still in situ. The Saxon inhumation is reputed to be that of Lilla, a thegn of King Edwin who died in 625 protecting the King from assasination.

(SE 88929868) Lilla Cross (NR) on Lilla Howe (Tumulus) (NR). (1)
(SE 88929868) Lilla Howe (NR). (2)
Lilla Howe, a Bronze Age barrow in which Lilla, minister to King Edwin, is buried. He had been killed in an assassination attempt on the king’s life in AD 626. The burial was accompanied by silver and gold ornaments, a brooch and several rings of gold. The cross, erected to mark the site, was temporarily removed during military training in the area. (3)
Two gold discs and four silver tags were in the Mayer Collection at Liverpool, destroyed by enemy action in 1942. (4)
Lilla Cross, a monolith some 7 1/2 ft high, the head of Maltese form, roughly cut. (5)
Lolla Howe, a round barrow, is situated at SW 88919869 and is surmounted by Lilla Cross. The barrow (22m diam and 1.8m high) is basically heather covered but there is a certain amount of loose stone which has been deposited by hikers. It has a slightly hollowed top. The cross, well weathered, is in a fair state of preservation.
Barrow and cross surveyed at 1:10,000. (6)
SE 889 986. Lilla Cross and tumuli (Lilla Howe and adjacent round barrow). Scheduled No NY/173. (7)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1919
( 2) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1958
( 3) General reference N York Moors 1966 40 84-5 (A Raistrick)
( 4) Annotated Record Map Corr 6” (N Mitchelson undated)
( 5) edited by William Page 1914 The Victoria history of the county of York, North Riding, volume one The Victoria history of the counties of England Page(s)463
( 6) Field Investigators Comments F1 JB 11-FEB-74
(7) Scheduled Monument Notification English Heritage, SAM List, North Yorkshire, March 1994, p 63

Miscellaneous

King Barrow
Long Barrow

Details of site on Pastscape

A Neolithic long barrow situated 100 metres north of Bishopstrow House. The barrow was designated Warminster 14 by Grinsell (1957) and survives as an earthwork orientated north-north-west/south-south-east. It is ovoid in plan and measures 70 metres long, 22 metres wide and about 3 metres high. Excavations by W. Cunnington and R Colt Hoare located no primary burials but secondary burials. The secondary inhumations were orientated southwest to northeast. One was accompanied by grave goods including a sword. The presence of grave goods indicated an early or mid Saxon date for the burial. These burials had disturbed an urned cremation which also may be Saxon in date.

King Barrow (TI) Long Barrow (GT) ST 8976445 (1)
King Barrow, Warminster, is a long barrow, 206 feet long, 56 feet wide and 15 feet high, oriented NNW/SSE. Excavated on two occasions by Hoare and Cunnington but they do not seem to have found the primary burial. Secondary burials comprised an inurned cremation which had been disturbed by three inhumation burials, one with an iron sword; probably all pagan Saxon. A good deal of the mound had been carted away in Hoare’s time. (2-3)
King Barrow is a well preserved long barrow averaging 4 metres high on the northeast. It has been constructed along the tip of a southwest facing escarpment. There are no traces of side ditches. Surveyed at 1/2500 (4)
The secondary burials are listed in Meaney’s gazetteer of early Anglo-Saxon burial sites (5)
Originally recorded as Warminster 14 by Goddard (5). Additional description by Cunnington. (6).
The secondary inhumations have been included within the gazeteer of early Anglo-Saxon burials. (7)
ST 37. King Barrow. Crematorium deposits at the east end. Comprised of a charcoal layer with calcined human and animal bones, and coarse pottery sherds covered by a heap of clay and earth. The mound comprised chalk rubble. Pottery, polished stone axe fragments amd animal bones were located on the Old Land Surface. (8)
Long barrow surveyed at 1/500 (see SPTA project archive). (9)
A long barrow situated 100 metres north of Bishopstrow House. The barrow is orientated north-north-west/south-south-east and is ovoid in plan. It is 70 metres long, 22 metres wide and about 3 metres high. (10)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1960
( 2) edited by R B Pugh and Elizabeth Crittall 1957 A history of Wiltshire: volume 1, part 1 The Victoria history of the counties of England L.V.Grinsell Page(s)145
( 3) by Sir Richard Colt Hoare 1821 The ancient history of Wiltshire (R. Colt Hoare) Page(s)72
( 4) Field Investigators Comments F1 NVQ 12-MAY-1967
( 5) The Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine – E.H Goddard 38, 1913-4 Page(s)340
( 6) The Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine – M.E Cunnington 38, 1913-4 Page(s)404
( 7) by Audrey Meaney 1964 A gazetteer of early Anglo-Saxon burial sites Page(s)269
( 8) British Museum occasional papers – 52, 1992. Non-Megalithic Long Barrows and Allied Structures in British Neolithic, 25 (I. Kinnes)
( 9) Field Investigators Comments – D.Field, H. Riley/20-JAN-1995/RCHME: SPTA Project
( 10) Scheduled Monument Notification – 11-FEB-1992

Miscellaneous

West Rudham Longbarrow
Barrow / Cairn Cemetery

Details of Long Barrow (Monument No.358114) on Pastscape

Neolithic long barrow with a platform cremation and a ditched enclosure on the south side. Some beaker sherds were found in the secondary ditch fill.

Long Barrow (NR) TF 81032532 MONUMENT NO. 358114 (1)
Long barrow excavated by Sainty and Watson in 1937 and by Hogg in 1938 (2)(3), 216ft long and 60ft wide, standing to a height of about two to three feet (4). A platform cremation recalls contemporary barrows in Wessex, as does a ditch encircled
enclosure on the south apparently used for libations (3). The only finds were a few flints and a secondary Neolithic flint
fabricator in the primary ditch silt, with some bell beaker fragments above (2). Plan (3). (2-4) This long barrow lies on common land and is bracken covered. It is 65m long, 20m wide and varies in height between 0.6m and 1.3m.
Surveyed at 1:2500 (5)
Additional reference (6)
The ditched enclosure to the south is not evident. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1959
( 2) General reference Norf Arch 26 1938 315 329 Plans & illus (J E Sainty A Q Watson & R R Clarke)
( 3) General reference Norf Arch 27 1941 315-331 Plans & illus (A H A Hogg)
( 4) General reference Bldgs of Eng NW & S Norfolk 1962 378 (N Pevsner)
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F1 JB 15-JAN-74
( 6) General reference B.A.R. 197 1 Beaker Domestic Sites 1982 29,258 (A.M. Gibson)

Miscellaneous

Stone Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

In a copse by the side of the road on the line of the County Boundary, there is a barrow which may be identified as the ‘Stone Barrow’ of an early Saxon Charter. On the opposite side of the road is an old pond known as the ‘King’s Watering Place’. (1)
The shapeless remains of an artificial earthen mound in a prominent ridge top position. Mutilated by tree growth, spread and modern fencing, it appears that the north side was destroyed by, and thus it predated, the road running E-W. A natural rise in the ground exaggerates its appearance.
There is no further information on the pond known as ‘The King’s Watering Place’. It is possibly that at SU 74558855. (2)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Field Investigators Comments F1 AC 03-MAY-1960
( 1a) General reference Oral: Major S Stoner, Stonor Hall
( 2) Field Investigators Comments F2 JRL 24-JUL-74

Miscellaneous

The King’s Standing
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Remains of a late Neolithic or early Bronze Age round barrow or possibly a Roman barrow. It is said to be the spot where King Charles I stood when he harangued the troops he brought out of Shropshire at the beginning of the Civil War. The barrow is up to 1.25m high and 20m across. Scheduled.

[SP 0804 9560 ] King’s Standing [G.T.]
” ... King’s Standing, a little artificial mount where Charles I is said to have stood when he harangued the troops he brought out of Shropshire at the beginning of the civil war.”
Duignan quotes Shaw (2) and other authors (a & b) regarding the use of King’s Standing by King Charles in 1642 and concludes, “It is doubtless a prehistoric tumulus, though it may have been used by Charles. The mound is about twenty feet in diameter and five feet high in the middle, and is enclosed with iron hurdles and planted with young trees.”
” ... the Tumulus of King’s Standing seems to have been a roadside tomb, for the labourers obtained a considerable treasure of silver chains, etc., when the wood was cleared ... I am told that the Tumulus was destroyed in ignorance by a new tenant in clearing the ground and the present landmark was thrown up and enclosed by him when his neighbours told of King Charles I’s review of troops there.
‘The King’s Standing’, Mound – Scheduled as an Ancient Monument under ‘Burial Mounds’.
King’s Standing consists of a very mutilated mound, the surface area of which is wooded and grass covered. It has a maximum height of 1.2 metres and a diameter averaging 16.0 metres. There are no traces of a surrounding ditch. A wooden pallisade encloses the site which is at the highest point of a hill.
The mound has been surveyed on 25” AM. No change.

King’s Standing, a mound, at the side of Ryknield Street, which has given its name to this district of Birmingham.
It is situated upon relatively high ground which falls away gently to the north and more steeply to the south, towards Birmingham. The feature has been lately remodelled and turfed over by the council and the surrounding fence removed. Four young treees grow upon the mound. It now has a diameter of 20.0m and a maximum height of 0.8m.
In its present restored condition, it is no longer possible to ascertain whether the mound represents the remains of a tumulus (Roman or Bronze Age) or whether it is a modern feature as inferred by Benton.(4)
Published 1:1250 survey, 1962,correct.
Noted in list of possible barrows of the late Neolithic/early Bronze Age. (9)

Miscellaneous

Hill of Peace
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

A Bronze Age bowl barrow known as Hill of Peace situated on a low rise overlooking Gayton Thorpe Hamlet to the south and 290 metres north west of Gatehouse Farm. The barrow is visible as a circular earthen mound standing to a height of 1 metre and 30 metres in diameter at the base. An infilled ditch extending up to 3 metres beyond the base is visible as a buried feature confirmed by crop marks recorded on aerial photographs. This barrow was described in 1950 as being possibly Roman. However Clarke revisited this barrow in 1957 and cast some doubt over its Roman origins. No references to Roman finds from this barrow have been located. Scheduled.

(TF 74261879) Hill of Peace (NAT) Tumulus (NR) (1)
Hill of Peace barrow said by Williams to be partially destroyed in 1922. Authy.3 (in 1950) described it as well defined and said that remains found recently suggest it is Roman, but Clarke rather doubts this. Clarke revisited this barrow 24-2-57 then surviving under grass about 3ft.high(5). (2-5)
No references to Roman finds from this barrow could be located. (6)
A ploughed down bowl barrow situated on the southern edge of a slight ridge. It measures some 32.0 m in diameter and 1.2 m in
height; there is no trace of a ditch on the ground although one is clearly visible on the air photographs (a).
The name Hill of Peace is no longer used locally and there is no knowlege of Roman finds.
Published 1:2500 revised (AM). (7)

Bronze Age bowl barrow known as Hill of Peace situated on a low rise overlooking Gayton Thorpe Hamlet to the south and 290 metres north west of Gatehouse Farm. The barrow is visible as a circular earthen mound standing to a height of 1 metre and 30 metres in diameter at the base. An infilled ditch extending up to 3 metres beyond the base is visible as a buried feature confirmed by crop marks recorded on aerial photographs. Scheduled. (8)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 6” 1959
( 2) Annotated Record Map Corr 6” (J Williams 1949)
( 3) Large Scale / Small Scale Map Revisers Comment SS Reviser 27.7.50
( 4) Annotated Record Map Corr 6” (R R Clarke 1949)
( 5) Externally held archive reference Norwich Castle Museum 6” Notes
( 6) Oral information, correspondence (not archived) or staff comments
( 7A) Aerial photograph APs (OS 76:019:050-51)
( 7) Field Investigators Comments F1 PAS 22-FEB-78
( 8) Scheduled Monument Notification – EH scheduled monument amendment 29-SEP-2000

Miscellaneous

Rowbarrow (Salisbury)
Round Barrow(s)

Details of site on Pastscape

Bowl barrow recorded by Grinsell as Salisbury 1.
Excavations in 1854 located a central cremation and two animal burials. A possible bowl barrow, 6 inches high, was also recorded by Grinsell. The excavated barrow was found surviving to a height of 0.6 metres during field investigations of 1965. No traces of any other barrows were recorded, although a ring ditch had been identified from aerial photographs. One of the ring ditches was identified during excavations in 1994. A series of ditches, possibly a field system, and a Neolith pit and ditch were also recorded.

(SU 1461 2838) Rowbarrow (NR) (1) Rowbarrow, a bowl barrow, Salisbury 1 – 30 paces x 3 ft on arable (2). Excavated by Akerman (3) in 1854, when he described it as 128 ft in diameter but probably spread by ploughing.
Excavation indicated that it had probably been previously disturbed and revealed a central cairn, charcoal and the bones of pig and dog. A second bowl barrow – Salisbury 2, is visible on a air-photograph just east of (SU 1464 2838), and smaller than the Rowbarrow. Grinsell (2) describes it as vague and 6 ins in height.
The cropmark of what is apparently the ring-ditch (SU 1465 2833) of a further barrow is also visible on air-photograph. (2-4)
Rowbarrow is much spread and averages 0.6m high. There are no other barrows visible on the ground. Published survey (1:1250) correct. (5)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( 1) Ordnance Survey Map (Scale / Date) OS 25” 1937
( 2) edited by R B Pugh and Elizabeth Crittall 1957 A history of Wiltshire: volume 1, part 1 The Victoria history of the counties of England Page(s)189
( 3) Society of Antiquaries of London Archaeologia : or miscellaneous tracts relating to antiquity 36, 1855 Page(s)181-2
( 4) Aerial photograph – Crawford collection 892, undated
( 5) Field Investigators Comments F1 JP 20-OCT-65

Miscellaneous

Brightwell Heath
Round Barrow(s)

Brightwell Heath, barrow cemetery (TM 242444) 4.75 miles E. of Ipswich. 1 mile NW of Brightwell (A 1093).
This cemetery is unevenly scattered along the N side of a narrow E/W plantation. Originally there were at least 8 mounds. The survivors are beside and SW of the Devil’s Ring (map ref. above).
This has a diam. of 120 ft. and consists of a low central mound surrounded by a ditch with an outer bank an enlarged
saucer-barrow. The bank is still 3 to 4 ft. high.
NW there are 2 bowl-barrows, the larger 110 ft. in diam. and 7 ft. high. the other 60 ft. in diam. and 6 ft. high.
To the SW there were 3 bowl-barrows, destroyed after excavation.
Further SW, at the W end of the plantation, there is a bowl-barrow 70 ft. in diam. and 6 ft. high.
Unfortunately, since this account was written in 1960, all except one of these barrows have been destroyed by ploughing. The survivor, crowned with fir trees, is beside the road across Foxhall Heath. It is still 3 ft. high.
Nothing is known of the contents of these mounds. Date. c. 1700-1400 BC.

Guide to prehistoric England – Nicholas Thomas 1976

Miscellaneous

Monarch of the Plain
Round Barrow(s)

The largest round barrow on Salisbury Plain. This Bell Barrow was opened by Hoare on more than one occasion but all he reported finding was charcoal and no interment. The Barrow has a sloping raised berm.

No.40, in point of size, may be called the monarch of the plain, being evidently the largest barrow upon it; and its history still remains veiled in obscurity. The first time we opened it by a very large section, and examined well the floor ; but though we perceived symptoms of cremation, in charred wood &c. we could not discover the primary interment. Nor were our subsequent researches more favourable, and we still remain in ignorance. Perhaps some future antiquary may be more fortunate; and such is the caprice of ancient sepulchre, that the deposit may be found near the top, as in the instance of our flint barrow at Kingston Deverill, (p.47).

The Ancient History of Wiltshire Vol 1, Hoare, Sir R.C. 1812 – Page 164

Miscellaneous

Prophet Barrow
Round Barrow(s)

A Bronze Age bowl barrow, listed by Grinsell as Wilsford 43, and part of the Lake Group of barrows recorded as SU 14 SW 51.

The barrow allegedly acquired its name in the early 18th century after French “prophets” set up their standard on it and preached to local people (circa 1710).

Excavated in the early 19th century by Colt Hoare, who found a primary cremation in what he described as a wooden box in a large cist. Accompanying the cremation were a bronze dagger and a perforated whetstone-pendant.

The barrow is extant as a mutilated mound 1.5 metres high.

Miscellaneous

Dorchester Neolithic Complex
Henge

Marks seen from the air near Dorchester, Oxon

For some years past observation has been made and photographs taken from the air of the marks which appear in the crops near Dorchester and it is now possible to give a fairly complete survey of them.
These marks, the appearance of which is dependent on the suitability of the crop and weather conditions. appear generally as lines, rings or dots of a darker green in the crops and are due to ancient disturbance of the subsoil. If at some time a ditch or pit penetrating the subsoil has been dug in a field and later has been levelled, the filling will be of a different nature to the soil it replaces and have a beneficial effect on that part of the crop which grows directly over it. By means of these marks the position of buried works can he located. Attention was first drawn to crop marks near Dorchester by the discovery by two officers of the Royal Air Force of the great rings to the north of the village. At the same time marks were seen on and near the Minchin Recreation Ground and on Bishop’s Court Farm.
Since 1933 I have watched this area in all seasons of the year and have taken many photographs of it from the air. From year to year as crop conditions changed more marks have been visible in the same field as the great rings. Several small circles lie at the northern end of this field, three of them with interrupted ditches, apparently similar to those discovered in then Neolithic settlement at Abingdon. Near the Dorchester-Abingdon Road there is a small square enclosure which apparently contained a round barrow, and there is a slight mound on the ground at this spot. A similar square enclosure on Limlow Hill, Litlington. Cambs., contained a round barrow. Other circles, apparently showing the ditches of levelled round harrows lie near the great rings, one inside their annulus, and two small square enclosures lie a little farther to the south. The great rings themselves are not truly circular and each has two entrances, one towards the north and one towards the south. The purpose of the nearly straight parallel lines which pass to the east of the great rings is as yet unexplained. Several other similar pairs of lines, some forming square ended enclosures, have been found within a few miles of Dorchester.
These lines are continuous so far as it has been possible to trace them, with the exception of a small break towards the northern end of the field and a wider break farther south. This latter gap is partly filled by a double circle.
The rectangular enclosure at Benson has a similar break, and the same type of enclosure at Sutton Courtenay has one of the lines crossing a circle, but no break appears in the lines.
In the other examples these enclosures have been seen to have square ends to the parallel lines, but at Dorchester it has not been possible to trace their extremities. Their extension to the North West is covered by a grass field and as grass does not readily produce crop-marks no signs of them can be seen in that direction. In a south-easterly direction they extend into a field near Queensford mill and appear to end there, but a rather mixed collection of other lines occurs and confuses the issue. It may be found possible to trace them further in this direction. If they did so extend they would lead to a point on the Thame from which another pair of parallel lines leads towards a large enclosure near Warborough. The junction of this second pair with the enclosure was obscured by ploughing when this photograph was taken, and only a portion of one side of the enclosure appears in the lower right hand corner of the photograph.
The lines are truly straight and parallel but more closely spaced than those associated with the great rings. Although they lead direct to the enclosure and have been traced no farther, there is no break in the enclosure at the point of contact. There is, however, an entrance to the enclosure towards its south-east corner.
The double circle within the enclosure is apparently the site of a round barrow which has been almost entirely levelled. Its outer ring is approximately 100 ft. in diameter and l0 ft. wide. Westwards of this can be seen a triple circle with a wide outer ring within which there is a broken ring of dots, then a smaller continuous circle and centrally a dot. This does not seem to show the site of any of the common types of round barrow and, whilst it may be rash to anticipate the results to be obtained from excavation, one may make the suggestion that these marks may show the site of a timber circle.
Leading from it towards the Thame is a right-angled line, probably evidence of a ditch which drained the outer circular ditch. Close by there is an elongated D-shaped enclosure which has a marked resemblance to another found in Allen’s gravel-pit to the north of Dorchester, in the ditches of which were found quantities of Iron Age pottery.
The circle to the south of the `timber circle’ is probably that of a round barrow and the disturbed area in which it lies may show the activities of gravel-diggers in fairly recent times. Other cases have been noted at Radley and Langford near Lechlade, where the digging of gravel has ceased when the ditch of a barrow has been encountered. The diggers finding the increased depth of topsoil and being unaware that this extra depth of overburden is only of narrow extent, cease digging in that direction and thus the remains of barrows are saved from destruction. Another small square, similar to those near the great rings, lies near the parallel lines. The area between the Dyke Hills and the Thames is a mass of marks. There are several bold enclosures with fairly straight sides, other less well-defined straight-sided enclosures, many circles both continuous and with gaps, and a multitude of dots. These marks seem to be characteristic of an lron Age settlement of considerable extent and density of population, but from the way in which the marks are intermixed they would seem to indicate works extending over a considerable period of time. Apart from two small circles near the Thame and a single squarish enclosure to the south-west of Dorchester one other site remains, the large rectangular enclosure, with a small rectangle within it, which lies close to a bend of the Thame. This would seem to be of later date than the other marks since a stone coffin was found thereabouts.
Thus far can air-photography carry us; further photographs in future years may help to clear up, or increase, the problems already presented, but the ultimate solution rests with those on the ground. There can be few areas which present such a wealth of early remains of a variety to suit the tastes of archaeologists no matter what period they may favour.


G. W. G. Allen. – Oxoniensia – 1938

Miscellaneous

Dorchester Cursus
Cursus

Details of site on Pastscape

A Neolithic cursus at Dorchester on Thames, largely known as cropmarks and partly excavated in 1947-52 and 1981. The cursus ditches were first recorded as cropmarks in 1927 (Crawford 1927) and again in the 1930s before being tentatively included in the first discussions of “cursus” monuments in the late 1930s and 1940s. Much of its course has been destroyed by gravel quarrying and the construction of the Dorchester bypass. Excavations between 1947 and 1952 focused on the northern part of the cursus and in particular on the monuments beside and within it (see Atkinson et al 1951; Whittle et al 1992), while work in 1981 in advance of the Dorchester bypass included some work at the southeastern end (see Whittle et al 1981). The significance of the cursus and the broad sequence of monument construction and use have been discussed on numerous occasions, most notably by Bradley and Chambers (1988), Whitle et al (1992) and Loveday (1999) while the dating of the cursus itself is considered by Barclay and Bayliss (1999). Whittle et al described the complex as displaying “arguably the greatest diversity of monuments and the longest sequence of development of all the Upper Thames complexes. More widely it can be compared with concentrations of monuments in Wessex”. Note that Atkinson numbered the monuments examined in 1947-1952 with Roman numerals (the cursus is Site III) while those excavated in 1981 were asigned numbers 1 to 4. The only potential confusion arises in dealing with site I and site 1. The cursus comprised two broadly parallel ditches circa 60 metres apart, running for at least 1600 metres in a more-or-less northwest-southeast direction. The cursus and its associated complex of monuments (see associated records) run across the neck of a strip of land defined by a bend in the River Thames and a tributary, the Thame. No northwest terminal has been identified, although Atkinson has noted some indistinct cropmarks (in Whittle et al 1992, p159) which might at least account for the alignment of the cursus. At the southeast end, there appears to have been no formal terminal. Instead, the cursus incorporated an earlier D-Shaped enclosure (“Site 1” – SU 59 SE 163) although Loveday (1999) has argued that this enclosure did not actually exist. The cursus at this end appears to taper slightly. It is presumed that the southern ditch abuts the enclosure ditch, while the northern cursus ditch appears to run parallel with and to the north of the enclosure ditch. Although cropmarks continue to the southeast on both sides of the Thame, there is nothing that could be regarded as a continuation of the cursus. Whittle et al did note the presence of a concentration of flint surviving as a surface scatter in the area between the southeastern end of the cursus and the Thame. Several interruptions of varying lengths are visible along both ditches of the cursus. The cursus also changes direction slightly along its course. The north ditch changes alignment once and the south ditch twice, although these changes in direction do not coincide. Bradley and Chambers (1988) suggested that the monuments preceding the cursus where aligned on the minor moonrise around the time of midsummer sunset, while the northwestern segment of the cursus represented a shift in alignment towards midsummer sunset itself, and suggested that this might be representative of a general shift in beliefs focused on the moon to a greater concern with the sun. The problems with this interpretation are the fact that they noted only one change in alignment of the cursus overall, while it is also clear that half of the cursus actually retained the alignment of the earlier monuments. In addition to Site 1, the cursus is also pre-dated by the long enclosure known as SIte VIII (SU 59 NE 4). Bradley and Chambers suggested that some other monuments may also pre-date it, though Whittle et al suggest otherwise on the basis of dating evidence. The southern cursus actually cuts across the “Site VIII” enclosure, the cursus ditch passing through the enclosure’s southeast entrance causeway (at which point the cursus ditch is also interrupted by a causeway). The best dating evidence for the cursus comes from this area. A polished flint axe came from the primary fill, a lozenge shaped flint arrowhead came from the bottom of the secondary silting, and sherds of both Ebbsfleet Ware and Beaker were reported from the upper fills. An antler from the primary fill has been dated to 3380-2920 BC (calibrated), though whether this genuinely dates the cursus construction is open to debate. However, dating evidence recovered from earlier and later monuments in the complex supports a broad 2nd half of the 4th millennium BC date, in line with cursus monuments generally. Excavations of the cursus ditch have generally been narrow cuttings or small stretches of ditch, although a reasonable length within Site VIII was examined. Surviving section drawings show the southern cursus ditch to have been cut up to 2.4m wide and 1.2m deep into the gravel. The surviving sections show a symmetrical silting pattern, although Atkinson refered to evidence for the presence of an internal bank. The ditches appear to have silted up naturally. Whittle et al suggested that certain aspects of the cursus layout – for example the open ends, the changes in alignment, the gaps along the ditches – hinted at episodic construction, perhaps in several stages. Atkinson noted an artifical interruption in the southern ditch caused by deliberate backfilling of the ditch. While this might support the idea of episodic activity, the location of this artificial causeway is not located. In contrast, Loveday argues that the cursus should be regarded “as the product of a single act” (5b, 8-12)

The Cursus West ditch passes through the probable Long Barrow at “Site VIII” (SU 571955) and is secondary to it. A quantity of Ebbsfleet or Peterborough pottery was found in the middle filling of the Cursus ditch at this point. (1)
The East ditch of the Cursus was later than the enclosure and earlier than the “droveway” at “SiteIX” (SU 570958), which yielded Abingdon Neo. pottery. (2)
Two causeways across W. ditch, one natural and one artificial, found near “Sites V & VI” but no dating material, during 1947. (3)
The Cursus, as shewn on A.P.s. extends from SU 5690 9585 to SU 5781 9509 with a possible extension to SU 5815 9481. (4)
Information as in T.I. A polished flint axe and a a leaf-shaped arrowhead were found in the primary silting of the ditch, and pottery of Ebbsfleet type in the upper silting. (5)
Excavations in advance of the Dorchester by pass examined the south-eastern terminal. A flint arrowhead was the only datable artefact found. A central entrance was found at the terminus. (6)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE TEXT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society Oxoniensia [RJC Atkinson. Archaeological Notes] 13, 1948 Page(s)66
(2) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society Oxoniensia [RJC Atkinson. Archaeological Notes] 13, 1948 Page(s)67
(3) Oxfordshire Architectural and Historical Society Oxoniensia [Archaeological Notes] 11-12, 1947 Page(s)164
(4) Field Investigators Comments F1 DT 01-AUG-51
(4a) Aerial photograph – O.G.S.Crawford’s Air Photos.
(5) Field Investigators Comments F2 FAH 18-SEP-52
(5b) by R J C Atkinson, C M Piggott and N K Sandars 1951 Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon: first report. Sites I, II, IV, V and VI, with a chapter on henge monuments Page(s)60-3
(6) edited by Andrew Pike 1992 South Midlands Archaeology [Newsletter of the CBA South Midlands Group 9] Council for British Archaeology Group 9: South Midlands archaeology newsletterno 1 (1971) – 12, 1982 Page(s)144-5
(7) RCHME/EH Aerial Photographers Comment Fiona Small/12-MAY-1994/RCHME: Thames Valley NMP
(8) Oxford journal of archaeology Bradley R, Chambers R. A New Study of the Cursus Complex at Dorchester on Thammes. 7, 1988 Page(s)271-89
(9) Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society – Whittle A et al. Excavations in the Neolithic and Bronze Age Complex at Dorchester-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, 1947-1952 and 1981. 58, 1992 Page(s)143-201
(10) A Barclay, J Harding (eds) 1999 Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland Barclay A, Bayliss A. Cursus monuments and the radiocarbon problem. Page(s)11-30
(11) A Barclay, J Harding (eds) 1999 Pathways and Ceremonies: the cursus monuments of Britain and Ireland Loveday, R. Dorchester-on-Thames – ritual complex or ritual landscape? Page(s)49-63
(12) Antiquity Publications Limited Antiquity – Crawford, OGS. Air-Photographs near Dorchester, Oxon 1, 1927 Page(s)469-474

Miscellaneous

Dyke Hills
Dyke

Col. A. L. Fox — On the Threatened Destruction of the British Earthworks near Dorchester, Oxfordshire.
Special Meeting, June 21st, 1870.
[Held in the Theatre of the Royal United Service Institution, Whitehall Yard, by the permission of the Council of the Institution.] Professor Huxley, LL.D., F.R.S., President, in the Chair.
The following paper was read by the author;—
XXXVII. On the threatened destruction of the British Earthworks near Dorchester, Oxfordshire. By Col. A. Lane Fox, Hon. Sec. Ethn. Soc.

Although the subject is not in any way connected with the paper that is to be read this evening (Mr. Forbes’s paper on the Aymaras), yet, knowing the interest which is taken by this Society in the preservation of our prehistoric antiquities, I venture to think that a few words in reference to the Dykes at Dorchester in Oxfordshire may not be without interest to the Meeting, owing to the report which has appeared in the papers since our last meeting, relative to the threatened destruction of these works by the owner of the property on which they stand. The ancient fortifications of this place consist of two distinct works—one on the south and the other on the north bank of the Thames. The former (on the south side) occupies the more eastern of two conspicuous hills, each of which is topped by a clump of trees, known as the Wittenham Clumps. This work is about a quarter of a mile to the south of the river-bank, and three miles to the north-east of Didcot Station on the Great Western Railway. The entrenchment, like that of most British camps, follows the outline of the hill, running round it in the most suitable position for defence. It commands an extensive view of the country for miles round; but the interior of the camp is itself commanded within 150 yards by the adjoining hill to the north-west. It is of an irregular oval form, about 400 paces across from S.E. to N.W. The defences consist of a ditch, about five paces wide at the outer in consequence of the natural slope of the hill. The inner rampart, if it ever existed, has been destroyed by cultivation; but it is not improbable, from the great command which the inner side of the ditch has over the opposite side, that the defence may originally have been confined to an escarpment surmounted by a stockade or some other defensive obstacle on that side. This mode of defence appears not infrequently to have been adopted by the ancient Britons in cases where the ground itself afforded the necessary command of the exterior. There is an entrance on the north-west salient angle which is swept by a knoll on the inner side of the ditch. Another entrance on the north-west leads in the direction of the ancient ford on the Isis. All these are characteristics of a British earthwork. The interior of the camp is terraced on the north side; but these terraces are evidently the result of cultivation in modern times. I found no sufficient evidence of the fabrication of flints in this work; but I picked up in the interior a fragment of a polished celt and a sea-shore quartzite pebble rubbed to an edge at one end. Pebbles similarly rubbed at one end are not uncommon amongst the relics of the prehistoric age. I exhibit a precisely similar implement which I found amongst the debris of a barrow on the Yorkshire Wolds.
Passing over the Thames, to the north side, we come to the Dykes, the threatened destruction of which is reported in the newspapers. They consist of a nearly straight line of entrenchments, about 900 yards in length, and composed of double banks and ditches, which cuts off a promontory formed by the bend of the river, and encloses an area of about three-quarters of a mile in length by a quarter of a mile in breadth. The principal ditch, about 57 feet in width, is situated between the two banks. There is a smaller ditch on the outer or north side. The outer or northern bank appears to have been the highest, which is probably to he accounted for by its being placed between the two ditches, and having received the materials excavated from both. This was well shown in the section of a fresh cutting made through the bank, in which the lines of the successive deposits could be traced. This section also showed that the banks are covered with a thickness of from 8 to 12 inches of vegetable soil, entirely devoid of stones or pebbles of any kind, and which must, in all probability, have accumulated from the decay of the grass on the banks. The length of time necessary for the formation of so great a thickness of vegetable soil must have been considerable. There are at present three openings through the dykes. About 200 yards of the right flank of the dyke is thrown back in the direction of the junction of the Thame stream with the Isis. From this point the river assumes the name of the Thames River. On carefully searching the ground which had been excavated from the banks on the left flank, and the cultivated ground in the interior of the camp, I found abundant evidence of the fabrication of flint implements [a number of cores, flakes, and chips from this spot were exhibited to the Society}; but I did not succeed in finding any flint tool, with the exception of one fragment of a well-chipped spear-head. I also found on the dykes several pieces of pottery of undoubtedly British production, and a fragment of wheel-made pottery of later date.
In the year 1836 an oval bronze shield, 14 by 13 inches in diameter, was discovered in the bed of the Isis, about 150 yards to the rear of the left flank of the dyke, beneath an accumulation of recent drift. {A drawing of this shield was exhibited, of the actual size.]The original is in the British Museum, and is described in vol. xxxviii. of the ^Archseologia’.
Mr. Clutterbuck, the rector of Long Wittenham, and the writer of an article on this place in the ‘Archoeologia’ is of opinion, from the position of this discovery, that the river still runs in its original course, and no doubt this is the case to a considerable extent; but there is, I think, evidence that the river has slightly altered its course since the dykes were erected. From the curve which the river makes at this point it might naturally be expected that it would leave the dykes on the north, and work its way southward; but it was no doubt checked by the higher ground on the south. The sketch plan exhibited to the Meeting shows, however, that the flanks of the dyke do not reach the present bank of the river, and that a space of thirty paces intervenes on the left flank, while on the right the dyke stops seventy paces short of the Thame stream. It is improbable that the defenders should have neglected to secure their flanks by causing them to abut upon the banks of the river as they existed at the time of its construction. The position of the portion of the dyke which is thrown back on the right flank also shows the Thame stream must have extended more to the westward, probably up to the line now marked by a small ditch. From the nearest point of this original line the dyke is drawn straight across to the Isis; but the meadow-ground below Dorchester, on the right bank of the Thame stream, must have been covered with water, though probably shallow and fordable; and it was in order to command this ground that an epaulement was thrown back on the right flank; but the abrupt termination of the work at seventy paces distance from the present stream shows that deep water must have existed to the westward of the present stream.
I found no trace of Roman tiles or pottery, nor can I learn that any thing Roman has been discovered on the site of the camp, though no doubt Dorchester itself was at one time a Roman station. This circumstance, coupled with the discovery of a bronze shield and the evidence of flint cores and debris (all of which must have been imported, as this is not a flint-producing district), appears to me conclusive in determining the fortifications to be of British construction. Viewing the position of the two works, and the position of the ancient ford between them, it may safely be assumed that they were connected in the defence of this locality, and were the work of the same people.
The ancient Britons never constructed their camps upon low ground. Sinodun Hill was no doubt the principal stronghold; and the Dorchester dykes on the low ground to the north of the river were thrown up to cover the passage of the river at the ford, and secure a communication with the left bank. About 200 yards of the left flank of the Dorchester dykes have now been levelled, or rather reduced for cultivation; a portion of this, however, was done by the former owner. I called upon Mr. Latham, the present owner, by whom the work of demolition is now being continued. After some conversation I elicited from him a promise that the levelling should be discontinued for the present; but I could obtain no assurance that it would not be continued at some future time. This is much to be regretted, as the ramparts are now in a good state of preservation. Traces of the work, however, will still be seen in those parts which have been lowered for cultivation.

The Journal of the Ethnological Society 1870, Page 412 to 415

Miscellaneous

Granham Hill
Long Barrow

A mound composed of earth and flints, covered by old trees, cut along the spine of Granham Hill, by an old parish boundary. No side ditches are evident, therefore it is only possibly a long barrow. The mound has is registered Nar Card 043 and information taken from A Private 6” Map, Marked up By Owen Meyrick of the Ordnance Survey. The site also gets a listing on the Wiltshire SMR No. SU16NE648.

Miscellaneous

Beckhampton Plantation Stone Circle
Stone Circle

G. vii. a.
This square mile contains a stone circle, of considerable dimensions, though imperfect and formed of very small sarsens, but which I believe to have been in some way connected with Abury. Though it appears to have been mentioned by Stukeley one hundred and forty years ago, it had been long since buried, and completely forgotten till I was fortunate enough to discover it by digging in the year 1877.
I was led to the discovery by the suspicious look of certain stones, which, though scattered in no regular form, appeared as if they might have once stood erect, in some sort of order, on the segment of a large circle. I had often stopped to examine them as I wandered over that part of the downs; till at last previous suspicions ripened into conviction, as closer observation revealed sundry other stones just showing above ground, and there also seemed to be faint indications of a trench, all pointing, with more or less accuracy, to the supposed circle.
Not to dwell upon the details of the investigation, which, however, were of singular interest to me, the result was that (with the permission of both owner and occupier of the land, and assisted by Mr. William Long) I probed the ground in every direction, and uncovered the turf wherever a stone was found : and on our first day’s work we unearthed no less than twenty-two sarsen stones, all forming part of the circle, and lying from two to twelve inches below the surface. These stones were all of small size, some of them very small,1 but that they were placed by the hand of man in the positions they now occupy, in many cases nearly touching one another, and that they formed part of a large circle or oblong, admits, I think, of no doubt. I say part of a circle, because, though the northern, southern, and eastern segments are tolerably well defined, I could find scarcely a single stone on what should be the western segment to complete the circle. That the area thus enclosed is not insignificant will appear from the diameter (in length, or from north to south, 261 feet; and in breadth, or from east to west, 216 feet). Again, its position (due south of Silbury, and within full view of it, as well as of the Sanctuary on Overton Hill, and with Abury immediately behind Silbury, due north of it, from which also Silbury is equidistant) seems to intimate that it may have had some connection with the great temple.
W. Stukeley mentions, in the following passage from page 46 of Abury Described, “Upon the heath south of Silbury Hill was a very large oblong work like a long barrow, made only of stones pitch’d in the ground; no tumulus. Mr. Smith before-mentioned told me his cousin took the stones away [then] fourteen years ago, to make mere stones withal. I take it to have been an Archdruid’s, tho’ humble, yet magnificent: being 350 feet or 200 cubits long.”
Sir R. Hoare, who, it is evident, did not know its exact locality, merely remarks on page 96 of Ancient Wilts, North, that ” Stukeley mentions on a heath south of Silbury Hill, a large oblong work made only of stones pitched on end, but no sepulchral mound.”
Subsequently, however, in speaking of ” Religious Circles,” he says on page 108: “In many parts of our county we find circles enclosed by a slight vallum of earth, some having an entrance, and others none: they are usually placed on elevated ground, and in commanding situations. On exploring their area, we dig up black earth with the fragments of bones, probably the victims of sacrifice: they are generally found to be placed near to some British settlement, and in some instances I have found them within it, and forming a part thereof, as in modern days the Church is considered as a feature of the village, and a necessary appendage. Such is the case within the lines of the British works on Huish Hill, in North Wilts.”
So says Sir R. Hoare, though I must confess that I cannot ascertain the existence of any similar circle of diminutive stones either on Huish Hill, or anywhere else in North Wilts: though in Denmark such circles are not uncommon, and often of very trifling dimensions, with a diameter of 20 to 25 or 30 feet, and oftentimes diverging into other (frequently strange and irregular) shapes, and composed of small stones. There is an admirable exemplification of such diminutive stone circles, oblongs, triangles, and other forms, in the Plan of the Promontory of Hjorte-hammers. But what may have been the intention of these Danish circles and squares and triangles, abundant though they are on the coast of Jutland, I do not think the Danish antiquaries have ever determined.
Nor were the members of the Wiltshire Archaeological Society, with Sir John Lubbock at their head, who visited this stone circle south of Silbury in 1879, able to form any opinion as to its object; nor could the able antiquaries of the British Archaeological Association, who visited it in 1880, give any decided verdict on the point: indeed they, not unnaturally, shrank from committing themselves by any off-hand expression of opinion: though all appeared to consider it as of great interest, and as worthy of very careful examination, more especially in its supposed connection with Abury and other allied relics of antiquity near.

From “Guide to the British and Roman Antiquities of the North Wiltshire Downs” by Revd. A. C. Smith, M.A. – 1884, Page 177 to 178 SECTION XII. G.H.I, YII., YIII.

Miscellaneous

Sheer Barrow
Long Barrow

The site of possible Neolithic long barrow, shown on a Crawford aerial photograph and the Ordnance Survey Map of 1843.

Barrow is now reduced to a soilmark.

It is orientated NNW-SSE, with a break on the south side of the ditch.

Miscellaneous

White Barrow (Lockeridge)
Long Barrow

A Neolithic Long Barrow is visible as a parchmark on an aerial photograph.

This may be the long barrow seen by O G S Crawford and recorded by Grinsell as being on the E side of Lockeridge?

A Neolithic long barrow was discovered in 1995 by the Royal Commission on the Historical Honuments for England.

Sources
D/SU15371/23 English Heritage
Wiltshire SMR No. SU16NW133

Miscellaneous

Temple Bottom
Long Barrow

Site of a chambered Neolithic long barrow, which was opened by Lukis and Smith in 1861.

The remains of a skeleton with a stone muller, sherds, bone implements, and burnt human bones were found.

Miscellaneous

Old Chapel
Long Barrow

A now destroyed Neolithic Long Barrow which was drawn by William Stukeley on his visit to the Avebury area in 1723.

The Long Barrow was aligned NW-SE and situated at NW side of a large enclosure.

The site was also visited by Sir R.C. Hoare.

Miscellaneous

Dolaucothi Gold Mines
Ancient Mine / Quarry

Dolaucothi Gold Mines

Although know for it’s advanced Roman mining methods, this site, and it’s surrounding water courses were almost certainly exploited during the Bronze Age. Any evidence for Bronze Age open cast mining or tunnelling would have been obliterated by the later Roman workings.

The Dolaucothi Gold Mines (grid reference SN662403), also known as the Ogofau Gold Mine, are Roman surface and deep mines located in the valley of the River Cothi, near Pumsaint, Carmarthenshire, Wales. The gold mines are located within the Dolaucothi Estate which is now owned by the National Trust.

They are the only mines for Welsh gold outside those of the Dolgellau gold-belt, and are a Scheduled Ancient Monument. They are also the only known Roman gold mines in Britain, although it does not exclude the likelihood that they exploited other known sources in Devon, North Wales and Scotland for example. The site is important for showing advanced Roman technology.

Roman mining methods
Archaeology suggests that gold extraction on this site may have started sometime in the Bronze Age, possibly by washing of the gold-bearing gravels of the river Cothi, the most elementary type of gold prospecting.

Sextus Julius Frontinus was sent into Roman Britain in 74 AD to succeed Quintus Petillius Cerialis as governor of that island. He subdued the Silures, Demetae and other hostile tribes of Roman Wales, establishing a new base at Caerleon for Legio II Augusta and a network of smaller Roman forts fifteen to twenty kilometres apart for his Roman auxiliary units. During his tenure, he probably established the fort at Pumsaint in west Wales, largely to exploit the gold deposits at Dolaucothi. Frontinus later restored the Aqueducts of Rome.

That gold occurred here is shown by the discovery of a hoard of gold ornaments in the 18th century. Objects found included a wheel brooch and snake bracelets, so named because they were soft enough to be coiled around the arm for display. All the objects are now held in the British Museum, and displayed in the Romano-British gallery. A sample of gold ore was found at the site by Henry de la Beche in 1844, confirming the presence of gold.

Evidence from the fortification (known as Luentinum from details given by Ptolemy) and its associated settlement show that the Roman army occupied the fort during the 1st and 2nd centuries AD (from circa AD 78 until around AD 125). However, coarse ware and Samian ware pottery recovered from a reservoir (Melin-y-Milwyr) within the mine complex show that activity at the mines continued until the late 3rd century at least. Since Ptolemy’s map dates to about 150 AD, it is likely that it continued being worked until the end of the 3rd century if not beyond. The Romans made extensive use of water carried by several aqueducts and leats, the longest of which is about 7 miles from its source in a gorge of the river, to prospect for the gold veins hidden beneath the soil on the hillsides above the modern village of Pumsaint. Small streams on Mynydd Mallaen, the Annell and Gwenlais, were used initially to provide water for prospecting, and there are several large tanks for holding the water still visible above an isolated opencast pit carved in the side of the hill north of the main site. The larger aqueduct from the Cothi crosses this opencast, proving the opencast to be earlier.

Following the Roman departure from Britain in the 5th century, the mine lay abandoned for centuries. There was a revival in the 19th century and attempts to make successful ventures at the site in the early 20th century, but they were abandoned before the First World War. In the 1930s a shaft was sunk to 430 feet in an attempt to locate new seams. Falling into disrepair and unsafe due to flooding at its lower levels, the mine finally closed in 1938. It was during this period that ancient underground workings were found, and the fragment of the dewatering mill discovered within. The extensive surface remains, especially the traces of hydraulic mining, were to be discovered only in the 1970s by intensive fieldwork and surveying.

Between 1975 and 2000 the lease to the underground workings at Dolaucothi was held by Cardiff University. Students from the School of Engineering were largely responsible for the renovation of the underground workings that were made safe for tourists. The mine was extensively used as a training mine for Mining Engineering and Exploration Geology students under the supervision of Drs. Alun Issac, Alwyn Annels and Peter Brabham. Students from the School of Earth Sciences carried out an active gold exploration programme using surface and underground diamond drilling techniques, geochemical soil sampling and geophysics.Geological exploration was carried out by students using both surface and underground drilling methods. The ore processing waste tailings dam was also sampled, mapped geophysically and assessed for its Gold potential. The mine was extensively mapped and a library of Dolaucothi data is still held at the School of Earth & Ocean Sciences at Cardiff University. Cardiff University finally gave up the lease to the underground workings in 2000 due to the closure of its BSc Mining Engineering degree course. Photographs of surface and underground activities from the Cardiff University archives can be found from the links below.

Although there is yet no comparable site in Britain, it is likely that field work will locate other mines, simply by tracing the remains of aqueducts and reservoirs, and often, if not usually, aided by aerial photography. Physical remains like tanks and aqueducts are often recognised by the shadows cast by the structures in oblique lighting conditions. Thus Tank A was first seen in early morning light when the sun’s rays cast an oblique light across the hill (Allt Cwmhenog) on which the structure is situated.

National Trust
The United Kingdom’s National Trust has owned and run the Dolaucothi gold mine and Dolaucothi Estate since 1941 when it was bequeathed by descendants of the Johnes family who had owned the mine and large surrounding estate since the late 16th century. Manchester and Cardiff Universities were active in exploring the extensive remains in the 1960s and 70s and Lampeter University is now closely involved with the archaeology of the site.

The National Trust organises guided tours for visitors, showing them the mine and the Roman archaeology.

Source Wikipedia – en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolaucothi_Gold_Mines

Miscellaneous

Little Cressingham Barrow Cemetery
Barrow / Cairn Cemetery

Little Cressingham, barrows (TL/867992) 0.75 mile S of Little Cressingham, on W side of Hard Clump, S of road from Clermont to Hopton House. Other barrows to W, in Seven Acre Plantation.
Grave goods in Norwich Museum.

Though levelled by the plough, the bowl-barrow at TL/867992 is important because of the unusually rich grave goods deposited with the male burial beneath it. The skeleton had been buried W of the barrow centre, its knees drawn up. It had been deposited dressed, with an elaborate amber necklace and a rectangular gold plate sewn to clothing on the chest. There were other gold ornaments together with a knife and a dagger of bronze. These grave goods are as rich as anything from Wessex: date, c. 1.700 1.400 BC.
Other bowl-barrows, probably contemporary and part of one cemetery, are N of Seven Acre Plantation. That at TL/8619S6 is enormous, being over 200 ft. in diam, and about 15 ft. high. Another to the NE is under the plough: it is about 120 ft. across and 3 4 ft. high.

Guide to prehistoric England – Nicholas Thomas 1976

Miscellaneous

Five Marys
Barrow / Cairn Cemetery

Five Marys, barrow cemetery (SY/790842) 2.75 miles ESE of A353/A352 junction, 1 mile W of Winfrith Newburgh.

There are 8 barrows in this group. arranged in a line E/W, following the ridge in the following order (E/W): bowl. pond, bell, bell, bowl, bowl, bowl, bell. The bowl-barrows have diams. of 20 to 70ft, and hts. 1-7 ft. The mounds of the bells are 50-70 ft. wide and 8-9 ft. high, their overall diams. being about 90 ft. The pond barrow is about 9 ft wide, with a slight outer bank giving it an overall diam. of about 20 ft. This cemetery, a good example of barrows accumulated in a straight line, must have been built in the period c. 1,700-1,400 BC.

Guide to prehistoric England – Nicholas Thomas 1976