
Taken 12th September 2004: Three apples at Wayland’s Smithy.
Taken 12th September 2004: Three apples at Wayland’s Smithy.
Taken 12th September 2004: Looking down the horse’s back towards Dragon Hill and the vale.
Taken 15th August 2004: Beautiful lichen on one of the stones.
The handy little book Cornwall’s Archaeological Heritage (ISBN 090629452-5) gives a brief description of the Mount:
The Mount is likely to be Ictus, the Iron Age tin trading station recorded by Diodorus Siculus. Recent discoveries of a copper ingot and amphora sherds (5th-6th centuries AD) show it was important in the Post Roman period – a south coast Tintagel Castle.
Visited 13th August 2004: I confess that we drove up the track, which got us pretty close to the stones. I don’t think you’re supposed to do this though, and it was very tricky turning the car round.
I can’t add much to Nick’s notes. The sheep in the field where the row lies are extremely friendly, which entertained the kids loads. Also, there’s an exclellent view of Josie Jump’s house from the stones.
Taken 15th August 2004: The red arrow indicates what I interpreted as a possible axe head carving on one of the smaller stones.
I should emphasise that this marking has not yet been positively identified as prehistoric or even artificial.
Taken 15th August 2004: This is what I interpreted as a possible axe head carving on one of the smaller stones.
I should emphasise that this marking has not yet been positively identified as prehistoric or even artificial.
Visited 15th August 2004: We decided to approach Greycroft from the east, but weren’t ready for the eeriness of approaching the nuclear power station down the main access road. Wide and straight, the road has ‘ready for trouble’ stamped all over it.
We parked near Seascale Hall (specifically NY040027) and took the footpath under the access road. This turned out to be a bad idea because the underpass was very muddy and culminated in a field with a big bull in it. We edged into the adjoining field, which was probably a good idea anyway because the footpath (now on the other side of the fence) looked impassable.
Skirting the perimeter of the field that Greycroft Circle sits in, we went past the point where the footpath goes onto the golf course (that looked impassable too because of giant bracken, so glad we didn’t approach that way). We kept on skirting the perimeter of the field (spotting a Grass Snake on the way) and eventually landed up to the south of the circle. This was the point at which there is the least cultivated land between the field boundary and the stone, so we went for it, following an existing path through the crops.
OK, that’s how we got there. It took quite a while, especially as it was hot and the kids were tired. As for the place itself, well I think everyone except me thought it was rubbish. Even I’d have to admit that the circle is a tad disappointing. Knowing that it’s heavily ‘reconstructed’ doesn’t help much. Basically you’re faced with a load of randomly placed boulders in a field near a nuclear power station. While I wanted to be struck by the way the site has withstood centuries of abuse, I couldn’t muster it. It has to be said that although the power station is menacing, Greycroft would still be a sad place to visit even if it weren’t there.
On the way back I tried to cheer the boys up by collecting golf balls (recommended as a pick-you-up). We went over the access road on our return journey, avoiding a load of bull.
Taken 15th August 2004: Two stones looking very much like they’ve been dumped (on the south west side of the circle). In the background is the golf course.
Taken 15th August 2004: Looking across the circle towards Sellafield nuclear power station.
Taken 15th August 2004: Greyscale at Greycroft.
Taken 15th August 2005: Looking approximately south west towards a distinctive looking peak (Grasmoor?). The stone in the foreground is one of the two that flank the entrance to the circle.
Taken 14th August 2004: The decorated slab from the road, complete with subtle fencing and well placed telegraph pole (I thought a second photo of the site in the context of its surroundings wouldn’t hurt).
Taken 14th August 2004: A slightly weird shot looking down the slope.
Taken 14th August 2004: Some rather nice big cup and ring marks. The two big ones are about 6 inches in diameter.
Taken 14th August 2004: Glebe Cairn viewed from a spot near Nether Largie North.
Taken 14th August 2004: One of the axe head carvings within the cist.
Taken 14th August 2004: The cairn viewed from the footpath (more specifically perched on a wall next to the footpath).
Taken 14th August 2004: I think the cairn in the foreground is Nether Largie North, and the cairn in the background is Glebe Cairn (thanks to Hob for helping me identify the cairns).
I’ve unwittingly managed to include Càrn Bàn cairn in this photo as well. It’s visible on the horizon above Nether Largie North, left of centre in the frame (thanks to Greywether for pointing that out).
Taken 14th August 2004: William and Lou clambering on the cairn with the old school in the trees behind them.
The National Monument Record suggests this isn’t a prehistoric standing stone.
Standing stone bearing the date 1721 with a cross, the only other inscription is the date 1778. The stone was erected in 1721.
However, the record is categorised as Period: Unknown which suggests there may be some ambiguity.
Taken 14th August 2004: The stone in the photo is part of the cist to the south of the main burial cairn.
My fingers are there to indicate two artificial looking grooves in the stone, each about the width of a finger. They are just about visible in the photo, but relatively easy to spot when you’re there.
Taken 14th August 2004: The smaller (and older) cairn in the foreground with the large stone circle/cairn in the background.
Taken 14th August 2004: A mere 17 years after my first visit, here’s the next generation (William approx. 108 cm) standing in the cist at Templewood.
When I was living in Carmarthen we used to go out to Merlin’s Hill. I don’t think there’s public access up there, but we were young and foolish. I remember trying to sneak past the farm without the dogs spotting us.
Up at the top is a beautiful meadow. I remember taking a very large pink kite up there and flying it. Some friends back home were looking out for the kite, but although Merlin’s Hill itself is really obvious from town, the kite was too darned small. Happy (and in hindsight very innocent) memories. This is a beautiful spot!
Taken 14th August 2004: The southern stone.
Taken 14th August 2004: Here is a reconstruction of one of the Upper Largie cists in Kilmartin House. The little piece of card reads...
This is one of the stone graves or cists found at Upper Largie. The pot inside (a reconstruction) dates to between 2,000 and 1,500 BC.
An obscure page on the Kilmartin House web site describes Upper Largie as follows:
The site consisted of four cists and four other features (two of which may have been cists) which were situated on the summit of a gravel terrace near Kilmartin. Out of these one cist was repositioned after excavation but was later partly covered by a layby and is now largely overgrown, and the other cists are no longer apparent.
The site also states that, “this site is on private land and permission should be sought.”
The easiest way to see something from Upper Largie is to visit Kilmartin House where one of the cists has been reconstructed.
A web page from the Kilmartin House web site describing the four cists found at this site (plus other ambiguous features).
Taken 13th August 2004: Looking through a hole in the larger of the two remaining standing stones.
Taken 13th August 2004: The larger of the two standing stones (that are still standing).
Taken 13th August 2004: A disgruntled trainee megarak sitting on the recumbent stone.
Taken 13th August 2004: The stones viewed from the north east (or thereabouts).
Taken 13th August 2004: The most westerly of the three stones, with the kerb visible behind it.
Taken 12th August 2004: Two photos of the discredited cup marks on the rocky outcrop near Cillchriosd standing stone.
Taken 12th August 2004: The stone viewed from the road (if my memory serves me).
Taken 12th August 2004: Cillchriosd standing stone with Louise (5ft 6) alongside.
Visited 11th August 2004: Taoslin is accessible over a small stile. It’s a hefty lump of rock, with large packing stones around the base of it. It’s a lot smaller than Tiraghoil and far less elegant than Fionnphort. On my visit the hollow around the base of the stone was full of water, forming quite an aesthetically pleasing pond. The reflection of the stone in the water was great. I wonder whether Taoslin is the real deal though? Those packing stones can’t be original. They’re far too large, and inexpertly placed.
Visited 11th August 2004: Tiraghoil was the second stone we came to heading east. I left the others in the car (the rain had subsided a bit) and made my way to the stone. This is a large lump of rock, much bigger than Fionnphort. It has quite a presence to it. With the weather as it was the stone did a good job looking immoveable (sort of, “I ain’t budging!“). The lichen hair might have been what suckered me into thinking of the stone as human.
Visited 11th August 2004: On our way back from Iona I persuade Louise that we should pop in and see a few standing stones. Fionnphort was the first we came to, and at the point when we arrived the rain was torrential.
What I should have done was ask at the house for permission to take some photos of the stone. Instead I wound the car window down and took some hurried photos from the relative dry of the driver’s seat. Yes, I know, this is not in the spirit of things at all. The stone looks rather pleasant as a sort of garden feature. It’s an elegant monolith.
Visited 10th August 2004: I was a little bit disappointed by the circle itself, having trudged through the wet to get there. The ‘natural amphitheatre formed by the surrounding hills’ was partially obscured by low lying cloud, which in itself might have seemed mystical had we been a little more dry.
In hindsight I think the weather played a big part in our desire not to linger. We were feeling pretty soaked, and were ready to get back in the dry as soon as possible.
From an article published on the BBC News web site on 29th July 2005:
Archaeologists have uncovered the remains of a Roman lead smelting site in a peat bog in Ceredigion.
Dating back about 2,000 years, Cambria Archaeology said mines in the Borth area could have supplied the heavy, bluish-grey metal for production.
Someone should really point out to this lot that 2000 years ago the Romans hadn’t got to Wales. Even taking the inaccuracies of carbon dating into account, it seems likely that the lead smelting was being carried out by the indigenous Celts rather than Romans.
Taken 12th August 2004: The fallen stone, which is the furthest to the north in the row.
Taken 12th August 2004: The southern most and middle and of the three remaining erect stones, viewed from the east (left to right).
Taken 12th August 2004: The most northern of the three remaining erect stones, here viewed from the east.
Taken 12th August 2004: The three remaining erect stones viewed from the east (with the rocky outcrop behind them).
Taken 12th August 2004: The row viewed from the north (approximately speaking).
Taken 12th August 2004: The row viewed from the rocky outcrop just to the west. Louise is standing next to the first erect stone on the left.
Visited 10th August 2004: This is the largest stone in the Lochbuie group, and it’s so close to the circle that it may as well be part of the same site. An impressive lump of rock, even in the rain.