Taken 16th March 2003: Looking north west, with Nant-y-Moch Reservoir and Drosgol in the background.
Taken 16th March 2003: Looking north west, with Nant-y-Moch Reservoir and Drosgol in the background.
Taken 16th March 2003: The cairn viewed from the direction of the road that runs to the east.
Visited 16th March 2003: William and I went on a megalithic mission into the mountains, and on the way we stopped to look for Nant-y-Fedwen. All I found that looked vaguely likely were these scattered boulders and a slight lump. Looking at the photos I’m still not convinced that I’ve identified the site correctly. Perhaps a second visit is in order to make sure I’m not missing something.
Taken 16th March 2003: The cairn (or something that I took to be the cairn) looking approximately west.
Taken 16th March 2003: Not much to write home about. Looking vaguely north towards the Nant-y-Moch Dam and Reservoir.
According to records at the NMRW, the cairn is 20 metres in diameter. At it’s highest point (the west side) is about 1 metre, and the remainder is between 40 and 60 centimetres high. It was only after a relatively recent gorse fire that the site was recognised to be a ring cairn.
In the Cadw records for Parc Cerrig Hirion I found a brief and rather vague reference to a second stone that may have stood in the same field. The land owner (who I assume was in conversation with a representative of Cadw) reported that his father had removed a standing stone from the field, and put it in the hedge. He rather helpfully offered to put it back again if necessary!
According to an extract I found in the RCAHMW records, the stone is named after a local robber:
It is known as ‘Bedd Morris’, which Morris, or Morus, was a notorious robber, who lived among the rocks on the summit of the hill commanding this pass; and which is the old, and once the only, road to Newport.
This record was written in 1875, and the bad punctuation is all original. Incidentally, the spelling ‘Morus’ is the Welsh way of spelling ‘Morris’ and both words are pronounced in exactly the same way. Apparently back in the nineteenth century the records were taken by members of the clergy, who dabbled in antiquarianism as a gentleman’s pastime, and their efforts were only sometimes checked by the professionals. I’m afraid I don’t know the author of the above.
In his book The Silbury Treasure Michael Dames identifies the Great Barrow as a possible Harvest Hill (like Silbury but smaller) because of it’s size and proximity to Knowlton Henge:
Knowlton itself is 20 feet high, and surrounded by two concentric ditches (the outermost being 354 feet in diameter and 34 feet across)... The majestic scale of the edifice disqualifies it as a Bronze Age barrow, and since Neolithic barrows in Dorset are long, not round, a harvest hill function is a reasonable provisional attribute. Thus, though the Knowlton mound is called the Great Barrow, it is not at all likely to contain a burial except perhaps as a secondary internment, inserted at a later age.
I’ve not visited this site, or even seen any photos of it, but Michael Dames refers to it in his book The Silbury Treasure writing in the chapter Neolithic Harvest Hills in England:
Surviving members of the same class [as Hatfield Barrow] may include the enormous structure on Silk Hill, Wiltshire – a large circular mound 135 feet in diameter, 18 feet high, and encircled by a ditch. This edifice was opened by Hoare, who doubted whether it was sepulchral. There was no sign of internment, and the only finds were ‘animal bones of deer etc.‘
If Dames is right, the Silk Hill Mound is essentially a scaled down (and simplified) version of Silbury Hill.
In the back of The Silbury Treasure Michael Dames writes that the name ‘Gib Hill’ is modern. Apparently it was called ‘Llewing Low’ in the eighteenth century. Dames’ source is the Derby Archaeological Society Journal (1908 & 1911).
Visited 6th April 2003: Although it’s an impressive place, this isn’t the kind of site I would usually go out of my way to visit. Luckily it’s sat betwixt Maengwyngweddw and Maen Serth, which makes for a lovely ridgeway walk.
There are two cairns that I could identify. One is really quite large, and is either a ring cairn or an excavated cairn (I’d go with the latter). It has some sizeable kerb stones on its western side, but nothing much elsewhere. Just to the south of the big cairn is a tiny one.
Taken 6th April 2003: The smaller of the two cairnes, standing just to the south of its neighbour. This shot is taken from the west (approximately) with my Landranger map for scale.
Taken 6th April 2003: The largest of the visible kerb stones (on the large cairn). All the visible stones are on the western side of the cairn.
Taken 6th April 2003: The big cairn from the north east, with kerb stones visible, and my Landranger map for scale. Beyond the cairn is the hill that Maen Serth stands on.
Taken 6th April 2003: This is the largest of the two cairnes that I found, viewed from the north east.
Visited 6th April 2003: Maen Serth was our goal on the walk along the ridge. Since our visit I’ve learned that it’s antiquity is in doubt, which I suspected at the time given that it stands right on top of the hill. As we approached from the west the stone looked at first like an elongated trig point. The track runs to the south of the stone, so a minor deviation takes you right up to it.
Maen Serth is a beautiful slender thing. Unfortunately it’s set in concrete, and surrounded by lines of erosion caused by my good friends the motorcyclists. The setting more than makes up for this, with beautiful views in all directions. Fortunately we weren’t met by any other walkers or of-road types while we were at the stone. In fact all was tranquil, and (despite the fact we live on a secluded rural hillside) I enjoyed sitting on a secluded rural hillside next to a standing stone listening to the Skylark. It’s a shame if this baby is Medieval rather than Bronze Age. I’ll post more up about the stone when I’ve done some more research.
Taken 6th April 2003: Looking against the grain. You can see the concrete pad on the east side of the stone, holding it up.
Taken 6th April 2003: The tip of the stone, taken from the north west.
Taken 6th April 2003: From the west, you can see tracks from the off-road running bikers on either side of the stone.
Taken 6th April 2003: Le picnic! William tries to get at the straw from his apple juice carton.
Taken 6th April 2003: The stone on the horizon, as seen approaching from the west.
From an article on the BBC News Web site, published 5th June 2003:
Draft plans for a £193m road development around Stonehenge have been published – but there are still divisions over the details.Read the BBC News Article | Read the Ananova ArticleIt is hoped that the re-routing of the A303 road, and a £57m visitor centre, will rescue the World Heritage site from its label as a national disgrace.
Visited 6th April 2003: Maengwyngweddw is only a short walk from the road, following a rutted ridgeway track that’s used by off-roaders and bikers. There’s a lot of erosion caused by these vehicles, and it’s getting worse because the bikes are making new ruts on either side of the track (presumably as they diverge from the route to avoid the puddles). I’m not a big fan of the 4x4 lot, but I really hate off-road bikers ‘cos they bring erosion and noise pollution! I’ll stop ranting now.
Maengwyngweddw is a small lump of quartz, partially shielded by reeds. Approaching from the west it’s easy to see. For some reason that isn’t entirely clear to me, there are a number of old broken bricks scattered around the area. They’re not modern packing stones, but there are a few around the hollow immediately next to the stone. The hollow is presumably caused by livestock, so perhaps the bricks were intended to stop this erosion. I recently saw a similar thing at Tafarn y Bwlch but done with stones. Maengwyngweddw is a Ceredigion style standing stone – small and squat. It’s worth visiting for the views, but not if you like your prehistoric sites on the big side.
Taken 6th April 2003: A close-up from the west. You can see the bricks around the base of the stone.
Taken 6th April 2003: The stone viewed from the north west with William (3 and a half years old) for scale, and Craig Ddu in the distance.
Taken 6th April 2003: Almost as soon as we arrived at the stone these of-roaders appeared on the horizon. They were very friendly, waving to us as they went past on the deeply rutted track. I just wish they’d do something a bit less destructive with their spare time.
Taken 10th May 2003: The Barber Stone, viewed from the north east, where the body of a man was found dating back to the fourteen century CE. As I understand it, the predominant theory is that his death was caused by the weight of the stone itself falling on him during it’s felling. In case you’re trying to locate this stone, it’s in the south west quarter of the henge.
Flotsky asked me to take this shot because he liked the stone, so I dutifully did. I don’t think either of us realised at the time that it had an extra significance. I only identified it by chance, some time later.
Visited 6th April 2003: On our way to Maengwyngweddw I insisted on stopping at Maen Hir to get some decent photographs. This time the weather was much better, with the view to the west relatively clear. The position of this stone at the head of the valley may relate to Afon Ystwyth, which eventually emerges next to Aberystwyth (the town’s name meaning mouth of the Ystwyth).
Taken 6th April 2003: The fallen stone from the west (this time the packing stones are obscured by the reeds).
Taken 6th April 2003: The view west from just behind the fallen stone (partially obscured behind the reeds in the foreground).
Visited 17th April 2003: More like a drive-by than a proper visit. The light was fading, and I was under the distinct impression that I was pushing my luck with prehistoric site visiting.
We were heading towards Pembroke on the B4320 and I spotted two large round barrows in the field to the south of the road. They looked quite broad, with shallow sloping sides, suggesting that they were originally large barrows that have been considerably ploughed down.
Visited 11th May 2003: Having visited the Hoar Stone, I drove down the road to Taston to see the Thor Stone. The village is tiny, and parking near the stone without blocking the road is tricky. You can’t miss it though. It’s so obvious that I wondered at first whether this was what I was looking for (should have done some research before setting out).
Taken 11th May 2003: From the north west. The verge was covered in buttercups, daiseys and small blue flowers that I couldn’t identify (I’m no expert on these things).
Taken 11th May 2003: The stone from the south, showing it’s position alongside the road.
A legend about the Welsh giant that created the Wrekin on his way to Shrewsbury (he took a wrong turn somewhere). A second legend about the origins of the hill is also linked to from this page.
Taken 24th May 2003: As well as being Jane’s first visit to Pentre Ifan, this was also Alfie’s first visit. He loved exploring using his recently discovered skill of crawling. It’s a far cry from this...
themodernantiquarian.com/image.php?image_id=8723
Shouldn’t neglect to mention Louise on her stone.
Taken 24th May 2003: I know what you’re think...this is almost identical to loads of other photos posted up here. Well you’re wrong! This snap (taken from the west) has the following special ingredients, never previously combined at Pentre Ifan:
a) Jane sketching on the other side of the dolmen (yes FourWinds, it’s a dolmen!).
b) Sunshine, and lots of it.
Visited 11th May 2003: On my way from a delightful weekend in Oxford, inevitably I popped into a few sites along the way. The Hoar stone was my first port of call.
I’ve visited the site before, but eight years on I had no recollection of where it was, and only some rubbish directions to go by. After driving up and down the road between Enstone and Taston, I realised that the site wasn’t where I’d thought it was (the dot on the map I was looking at was a mile stone!). The memories eventually came flooding back, and I recalled doing exactly the same thing back in 1995.
Just for the record, you need to take the B4022 from Enstone towards Taston, then take the first left hand turn and park immediately on your left. Now turn your head 90 degrees to the right and you’re looking at it. Sounds easier than it is, because the chamber is shielded from the road by trees.
Taken 11th May 2003: The chamber viewed from the north. In the bottom left hand corner of this shot you can see a bit of the recumbent stone.
Taken 11th May 2003: The recumbent stone that lies, partially buried just to the north of the main chamber (not exactly yards away broen).
Taken 11th May 2003: The chamber viewed from the north east (on the other side of the lane).
Visited 24th May 2003: We made our way up to this site from the Waun Mawn Stone, but over-shot, and ended up approaching from the north west. The views from up there were incredible, even though the weather was changing from erratic to rainy.
Of the three stones that we could identify, only one remains standing in a circular puddle (yes, another deep muddy puddle for William to play near). Both the recumbent stones were clearly standing at some time, with identifiable holes where they once stood. Two of the stones (the ones to the east) are close together and the third stands a way off to the west. There was quite a good feeling to the place, and I reckon it would be extremely pleasant to sit up here on a nice day and enjoy some solitude.
This site is one of those ones that nobody can agree upon. The most interesting explanation is that it’s the remains of a stone circle, but it’s also been interpreted as a stone row, or just some sort of ruined megalithic structure. Here’s what N.P. Figgis says about it in Prehistoric Preseli:
A group of stones, variously considered as a pair with one stone fallen and – least likely – remnants of a circle of which most are fallen. No early reference or place names suggest the presence of a circle; the three stones involved would indicate an enormous diameter. Interpretation open to suggestions!
I agree with Figgis that the circle would be whopping if that’s what it was. Based on what I’ve seen I reckon it’s a stone row.
Taken 24th May 2003: The fallen stone at the western end of the row, sitting a short distance away from the other two.
The stone that remains standing can be seen just below the two sunlit mountains in the distance (at a guess these two peaks are Frenni Fawr and Moel Drygarn).
Taken 24th May 2003: At the eastern end of the row, this stone is definately an ex-standing stone. You can see the remains of hole where it once stood.
Taken 24th May 2003: The middle stone, viewed from the south.
Taken 24th May 2003: Of the three stones, the middle stone is the only one that remains standing. Here it is viewed from the east (approximately speaking).
Taken 24th May 2003: This is a pretty poor photo, but it’s the only one I have showing the way that the stones are spaced out. It’s taken from the north west (the stones are indicated by the red arrows).
Visited 10th May 2003: This was the penultimate site of the day, and the folks I were travelling with were getting slightly megalith weary. I hopped out of the car for a quick gander, and tried to look like I wouldn’t take long. What an amazingly enigmatic site this is. I think I need to do it justice with a longer visit when I have time to contemplate (perhaps in another lifetime!).