Photos taken by Alvin Langdon Coburn, apparently during excavations:
geh.org/ar/strip27/htmlsrc/m197926660003_ful.html#topofimage
geh.org/ar/strip27/htmlsrc/m197926660004_ful.html#topofimage
The Coflein record, to be fair, isn’t sure how old this stone is. It describes it as “an upright slab, 2.8m high by 1.7m by 0.5-0.8m” possibly on a mound.
I think it could well be the one mentioned here in on p186 of “Tales of the Cymry: with notes illustrative and explanatory” by James Motley (1848).
It is reported of a large stone near the end of the old canal, but on the left of the road from Neath to Brittonferry, that there is a charm, not yet discovered, which can compel it to speak, and for once to reveal the secret of its history: but that having once spoken it will be silent for ever.
Online at the Internet Archive.
Maen Cetti, on Cevn-y-bryn, in Gower, was, says ancient tradition, adored by the pagans; but Saint David split it with a sword, in proof that it was not sacred; and he commanded a well to spring from under it, which flowed accordingly. After this event, those who previously were infidels, became converted to the Christian faith. There is a church in the vicinity, called Llanddewi, where it is said that St. David was the rector, before he became consecrated a bishop; and it is the oldest church in Gower.
From ‘Iolo Manuscripts: A Selection of Ancient Welsh Manuscripts, in Prose and Verse’ by Taliesin Williams and completed by Rev. Thomas Price (1848).
The giant of Norman’s Law in Fife, known in legend as the Earl of Hell, is said to have hurled a boulder at the people of Dundee across the River Tay. The boulder fell short and crashed against the (Dundee) Law Hill where it still rests.
From an article for the Scotsman by Brendan O’Brien, online at heritage.scotsman.com/myths.cfm?id=1870532005
This comes from the Scottish Big Cat Trust at
bigcats.org/abc/sightings/1998/beastofnefife1.html
and was originally in the Dundee Evening Telegraph for September 8th 1998.
A North Fife man, who was out for a walk in woods near Luthrie on Monday night, reckons he may have caught a glimpse of the same black puma-like animal which was apparently spotted a few miles south in Letham at the weekend. The man, who asked not to be named, said he was strolling down a path near the west side of Norman’s Law at around 6.45 pm when he saw a ‘mysterious creature’ roaming through undergrowth around 20 yards in front of him.
He said, “At first I wasn’t that worried because you always hear noises from rabbits, foxes, deer and the like, but when I stopped for a minute to watch this mysterious animal more closely I quickly realised it was not the sort of thing you normally see in the area. It was long, black and sleek like a big cat – certainly with a feline posture – and looked to be something like a panther or a puma. I don’t think it saw me but I have to say I didn’t hang around for long after that to give it a chance. It is quite remote up there and with me being on my own, I didn’t want to find out if it had had its tea or not.”
The man, who regularly walks in the area, said he had doubts about what he had seen until he read Press reports about another sighting. At around 8.15 on Sunday morning a man out walking his dog apparently saw a similar creature prowling across playing fields in Letham.
Mary Stark who runs the Bow of Fife post office said the sighting of the big cat in Letham had been the “talk of the village” for the past few days. She said several people who attended a christening at Letham village hall on Sunday had also claimed to have seen the creature that morning.
Around 30 sightings have been reported at a number of locations in north east Fife over the past few years. Anyone who thinks they might have seen such an animal in the area recently is asked to contact divisional intelligence officer George Redpath at Cupar police station. He has been collating a file on the subject for many years and can be contacted on 01334 418700.
Traditionally Black Dogs are well known for haunting barrows – and why should modern Black Cats miss out on frequenting prehistoric spots?
Norman’s Law (the hill of the northern men) is in height 850 feet above the sea level. It commands a most delightful prospect, especially to the north, where the Carse of Gowrie and the Frith of Tay appear in full view in all their richness and variety. There are three concentric circles of rough stone near the top, supposed to have been a fortification of the Danes to cover their inroads into the country, or perhaps erected by the natives to repel these invaders.
From The New Statistical Account of Scotland By Society for the Benefit of the Sons and Daughters of the Clergy (1845) v11, p49.
It seems from the RCAHMS record that the two outermost rings are the oldest, and delineate the prehistoric hillfort. The innermost possibly postdates the Roman invasion and was built to protect the huts of the settlement within.
“Scenes and Stories Little Known – Chiefly in North Wales” is now available to read online. It seems that it wasn’t written by the vicar, but his wife(?), Margaret Butler Clough. What’s more, the stories are in verse. The profits went to the Repairing Fund for Bistre church, you’ll be pleased to hear. The relevant chapter is called “The Field of the Golden Corselet” in which she describes “A mist-robed form stood with imperial mien” of which none saw the face, and “sometimes low sweet music stole around.”
Interestingly, in the notes to the poem, she says:
An old man, commonly called “old Hugh of the Pentre,” used to tell children so about 25 years ago. He called the appearance “Brenhin yr Allt,” literally the Ancient King.
- this adds weight to the idea that the story existed before the discovery of the cape? Though the sightings in the verses do not actually mention a gold cape, the hay field was “ever called the Field of Gold” (according to the poem, at least).
The bones found were said to be “those of a man of great stature, and the skull of gigantic proportions; but they crumbled almost immediately to dust.” MBC connects this with stories of “Benlli Gawr, or the Giant, [who] lived at Mold, then called Wydd Grug, in the 5th century. He was lord of an extensive district around, and had a camp or fortress on Moel Benlli.”
Denbury Hill, or Denbury Down, has an encampment. There is also to be seen an ancient stone, with all the markings thereon, with which the Danes sharpened their weapons of war. Treasure is said to be hidden there, and these two rhymes are current:
“When Exeter was a furzey down,
Denbury was a borough town.”“If Denbury Down was levelled fair,
Denbury could plough with a golden share.”
This information was taken from the Illustrated Western Weekly News, 5 August, 1911, p24, and quoted in Notes on English Folklore
J. B. Partridge
Folklore, Vol. 28, No. 3. (Sep. 30, 1917), pp. 311-315.
Could this refer to the same stone? The area sounds convincingly between Bratton and Edington.
The following occurs in a Perambulation of the Hundred and Parish of Westbury, temp. Eliz., 1575:
“And so by a straight line between Eddington Field and Bretton’s Field to a stone called ‘Patten’s Stone’ (anciently Padcanstone; and so straight along the way to a little ball where once was a stone cross, called Lealland Cross, standing on the highway between Devizes and Warminster.”
A contribution on p278 of Wiltshire Notes and Queries, June 1894.
The main road from Padstow along the coast cuts through this ancient cemetery. It is interesting to note that this portion of the road has ever been dreaded by passengers at night as haunted.
From chapter 9 of ‘A Book of Folk-lore’ by Sabine Baring-Gould [1913], online at:
sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/bof/bof09.htm
Magic doesn’t yet have any information on this location, though it does list it as a scheduled monument, being a prehistoric cemetery. The Royal Cornwall Museum in Truro has some of the finds. The following are extracts from chapter 9 of ‘A Book of Folk-lore’ by Sabine Baring-Gould [1913], online at:
sacred-texts.com/neu/celt/bof/bof09.htm
In September 1900, I received a summons to go to Padstow in Cornwall, as at Harlyn Bay near there a prehistoric necropolis had been discovered in blown sand that had been carried some way inland and was hard compacted. A gentleman had bought a field there, and was about to build a house. I found that he was impatient to get his dwelling ready before winter, or, at all events, have the foundations and walls got on with, and he would not allow a slow and careful exploration. It had to be done in a hurry. What was more, and even worse, the fact of the discovery got into the Cornish and Devon papers. The season was that of tourists. The owner charged sixpence a head for visitors, and they came in swarms, pushing everywhere, poking about the skeletons and skulls with their umbrellas and parasols, scrabbling in the graves in quest of “finds”, and from the moment this rabble appeared on the scene no work could be done save protection of what had already been uncovered. A more distressing and disappointing exploration could not be imagined. However, some points were determined.
More than a hundred graves were uncovered; they were composed of boxes of slate in which the skeleton sat crouched, mainly, but not exclusively, on the right side. Some were of females, some of mothers with their infants in their arms. No skull was discovered that indicated death through violence, and all skeletons were complete. Some of the coffins were in layers, one above another; rudely speaking, they pointed east and west, the heads being to the west; but what governed the position seemed to be the slope of the hill, that fell away somewhat steeply from the south to the north.
Some bronze fibulae were found, finely drawn armlets of bronze wire making spiral convolutions about the wrist, a necklace of very small amber and blue glass beads strung on this bronze wire; a good deal of iron so corroded that, what with the friability and the meddlesomeness of the visitors, who would finger everything exhumed, it was not possible to make out more than that they did not represent fragments of weapons...
There were found at the time a great many needles and prongs of slate, which were afterwards exhibited on the spot and sold to tourists as stone spearheads. They were no such thing. They were splinters of a soft local slate that had been rolled by the wind and grated by the sand into the shape they assumed, and such are found all through the district...
On the right hand of the way, coming from Padstow, probably more of the necropolis remains, and it is earnestly to be desired that it may at some time be scientifically examined, without the intrusion of the ignorant and vulgar being permitted...
From Castle Combe I took a northerly direction, in order to investigate another fragment of British antiquity, recorded by Mr. Aubrey in his manuscripts. He distinguishes it by the name of Long barrow, which is situated in the parish of Luckington, Wilts, adjoining to the Lord Marquisse of Worcester’s parke at Badminton: [“] it is long, and some oakes and other trees and boscage cover it. [“]
“Here were accidentally discovered, since the yeare 1646, certain small caves, about five or six in number; they were about fower foot in height, and seven or eight foot long; being floored, lined and rooft with great plank stones, which are plentifull hereabout.”
From the experience I have lately had in similar antiquities, I can with safety pronounce this to have been a long barrow with a kistvaen (as at Lugbury), placed at the east end; and it is very probable that the oblong stone enclosures on the sides of the barrow may have also been appropriated to sepulchral purposes..
From Richard Colt Hoare’s ‘History of Ancient Wiltshire’, online at Wiltshire County Council’s website:
wiltshire.gov.uk/community/gettextimage.php?book_no=057&chapter_no=05&page_no=0006&dir=next
Here is Richard Colt Hoare’s description of the same excavation:
A little to the west of Alfred’s Tower is a large mound of earth, vulgarly called JACK’S CASTLE, and generally considered as one of those beacons, where in former times, fires were lighted to alarm the neighbourhood on the approach of an enemy:
“And flaming beacons cast their blaze afar,
The dreadful signal of invasive war.”
Its elevated situation over the great forest of Selwood, commanding a distant view of the Severn, was well adapted to such a purpose, and might have been so used; but I always had considered its original destination to have been sepulchral, and so, on opening, it proved to be.After digging for some feet through a soft sand, we came to a thick stratum of picked flints, under which was deposited an interment of bones very minutely burned, enclosed within a cist, and amongst them a small lance head of brass, and an axe or hammer of a species of stone, called Sienite.. The lance head had been esteemed valuable by the Briton its possessor, for it was protected by a sheath of wood. The axe is one of the most perfect we have discovered, and is very nicely formed. The high antiquity of this tumulus, which I shall call SELWOOD BARROW, is satisfactorily proved by the articles found within it.
From ‘The History of Ancient Wiltshire’, online at the Wiltshire County Council website
wiltshire.gov.uk/community/gettextimage.php?book_no=056&chapter_no=03&page_no=0009&dir=next
This fort is on a sticky-out finger of land just above Stourhead, which was where Richard Colt Hoare lived.
The first [object that deserves attention] is a camp in Stourhead Park, double ditched, and of a form nearly circular, with entrances towards the east and west: it occupies the whole ridge of the hill, and is naturally defended on each side by steep and precipitous ground. The area within the outer ditch contains seven acres: the circuit of the ditch is three furlongs 20 yards, and the sloping height of the vallum, where deepest, is 27 feet. A little beyond this camp rises the river Stour, from six springs or wells, which the Stourton family take as their armorial bearings: the ancient park wall ran between them..
From ‘Station 1’ of Colt Hoare’s “History of Ancient Wiltshire”, online here at the Wiltshire County Council website
wiltshire.gov.uk/community/gettextimage.php?book_no=056&chapter_no=03&page_no=0007&dir=next
Black Dogs. The Padfoot or phantom black dog is common enough in this county. His chief attribute seems to be the guardianship of graves. The retreat of Prince Charlie’s army through the Moorlands in 1745 left quite a crop of these spectres. At Swinscoe on the Leek-Ashbourne road three Jacobites were ambushed, and a phantom black dog guards their grave.
I’d like to make a bet the dog guards this barrow, as many of his canine cousins do elsewhere. The barrow’s not far from the road, and there’s no graveyard the soldiers could have been buried in.
According to the scheduled monument record on Magic, the barrow’s on the crest of a prominent ridge in the landscape, and is nearly 1.5m high. “Limited antiquarian investigation at the monument’s centre located a rock-cut grave containing a partly disturbed inhumation. A cremation, Romano-British pottery, a piece of iron and a flint were found above the rock-cut grave.”
From Notes on Staffordshire Folklore
W. P. Witcutt
Folklore, Vol. 53, No. 2. (Jun., 1942), pp. 126-127.
On Watch Croft, one massive cairn was built on the very summit of a hill that lacks any tors. On the western edge of the summit area another cairn was built. This cairn incorporates within its structure a series of grounders. The most massive of these is to the north, and is enclosed by the kerb of the cairn. This grounder is 4.5m long, 1.5m high, and has a water-filled solution basin on its upper surface measuring 20x30cm with a depth of 15cm. W C Borlase dug into this cairn. At the time of his excavation the stone with the solution basin was ‘uncovered’. Judging from the amount of cairn material now present within the cairn, and the amount surrounding it that was dug out, this stone was never completely covered. Its uppermost surface, with the solution basin, was meant to be seen.
[..]
This is the only area on Watch Croft where solution basins occur. What is particularly significant is that the cairn overlooks the Men-An-Tol, another culturally transformed solution basin, from which the hill is dominant on the northeastern skyline.[later in the article it is suggested:]
The incorporation of solution basins within cairns, as at Watch Croft and Boscawen Un, or the placing of cairns in their vicinity during the Bronze Age, may be all about connecting the purity of rain water with death rites involving a requirement for purification in relation to the potential pollution of death. The circular form of many of the basins in turn connects them with the circularity of the sun that dies a dramatic fiery death in the sea every day in the west, only to be reborn perfectly formed in the cool air of the eastern morning. Water is thus conceptually connected both to death and the regeneration of life. It both extinguishes fire and gives birth to it. Given that cremation appears to have been the primary burial rite, this general metaphorical connection is of particular interest.
An Archaeology of Supernatural Places: The Case of West Penwith
Christopher Tilley; Wayne Bennett
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 7, No. 2. (Jun., 2001), pp. 335-362.
The owners of Rosemerryn currently offer bed and breakfast, and a self-catering cottage. On visiting the fogou, their website says:
We would like guests staying at Rosemerryn to feel free to explore the Fogou as often and whenever they wish, and ask only that people are respectful of the site and considerate of each other. We would be grateful if non-resident visitors could phone in advance to arrange a convenient time to visit the site.
Tel: 01736 810530
Tilley and Bennett’s article describes the unusual ‘solution basins’ (rocks wiv big round holes in) that are a product of erosion in the West Penwith area, and the apparent relationship between rock outcrops (where these basins are) and nearby Neolithic sites. This excerpt suggests an origin for the holed Men-An-Tol stone:
The southwest face of the [holed] stone is virtually flat, while the northeast face has a distinctly bevelled edge. It has been variously suggested that these stones formed part of a circle here or are the remains of a chambered tomb. Neither explanation is very convincing. It would seem best to maintain that this monument is a distinctive stone setting associated with the Boskedan stone circle, which is sited on the skyline and visible from the Men-An-Tol stones on top of a hill 750m to the ENE. The overall axis of the Men-An-Tol stone alignment is NE-SW, the direction of the midsummer sunrise and midwinter sunset.
The holed stone almost certainly rested originally in a horizontal position on the very top of a tor stack, with its flat southwest side forming the flat bottom of the basin while the bevelled northwest side was the uppermost surface holding water until the base eroded through. Thus, the Men-An-Tol holed stone, set upright, is a direct inversion of the original position of the stone in its natural state. A form that once held water has now become dry and transformed into a material metaphor for the setting and rising sun. This conceptual transformation is strengthened by the stone’s alignment on the rising and setting sun at important times of the year.
The rocks nearest to the Men-An-Tol with solution basins of the requisite size and form occur on the southern end of Zennor Hill, 4.75km NE. Here, there is an extant example which has completely eroded through of slightly larger dimensions: 50-80cm in internal diameter and about 30cm thick. The overall alignment of the stones might thus also be making reference to the origin of the holed stone in the complex, a mnemonic statement.
Holed stones of the type used at Men-An-Tol and found on Zennor Hill are extremely rare. In almost all instances solution basins erode through the sides. We should also note that the main process of erosion effectively ceases when water can drain out of the basin. Large holed basins are therefore very special and almost certainly of great antiquity. The Men-An-Tol needs to be considered as a very special stone which has been curated in a uniquely meaningful way.
An Archaeology of Supernatural Places: The Case of West Penwith
Christopher Tilley; Wayne Bennett
The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 7, No. 2. (Jun., 2001), pp. 335-362.
On a high point of [this] hill.. is a very interesting monument of antiquity, and by far the most complete of any we have yet met with. I have taken notice of these circles amongst the earthen works in my Introduction.. but the one on Codford Hill so far exceeds all these in symmetry of form, and beauty of situation, that I have purposely reserved my description.. for the present occasion.
This earthen work, is situated on the summit of a hill commanding a most extensive and interesting prospect. It forms nearly a complete circle, the area of which contains above nine acres, and the circuit amounts to three furlongs and one hundred and ten yards. It is surrounded by a neatly formed vallum and foss, which, together with the area, have been much defaced by the plough.
It is vulgarly called OLDBURY CAMP, but the smallness of the enclosure, as well as the slightness of the ramparts, evidently contradict the idea of its either having been made or used for military purposes; it has no signs of any entrance, nor is the ditch within, as we frequently find to be the case in the earthen works appropriated to religious purposes. That this work was dedicated to some juridical or religious ceremonies, the nature of its plan, its size, and elevated situation seem to indicate.
[Colt Hoare goes on to describe how the Persians and others worshipped (on) hills, so tacitly making an analogy with places like Codford]
.. for they say, that the Gods are extremely delighted with such high and pleasant spots. This practice in early time was almost universal, and every mountain was esteemed holy. The people who prosecuted this method of worship, enjoyed a soothing infatuation, which flattered the gloom of superstition.
The eminences to which they retired, were lonely and silent; and seemed to be happily circumstanced for contemplation and prayer. They who frequented them were raised above the lower world, and fancied that they were brought into the vicinity of the powers of the air and of the Deity who resided in the higher regions. But the chief excellence for which they were frequented was, that they were looked upon as the peculiar places where God delivered his oracles.
From chapter 5, p13 of the ‘History of Ancient Wiltshire’ by Richard Colt Hoare.
Online here at the Wiltshire County Council website:
wiltshire.gov.uk/community/gettextimage.php?book_no=056&chapter_no=05&page_no=0013&dir=next
The first object of our attention, near a clump of trees called ROBIN HOOD BALL, is one of those ancient circles which I have before mentioned and described.. This, like the generality of them, is placed on an elevated and commanding situation, but has this peculiarity, of having one circle within the other, with an entrance towards the north.
We have to regret the great injury these circles have sustained by the plough, as in their original state they must have been highly curious, and are the more remarkable, from representing a double circle.
On the north-west side of this work are some barrows, one of which had been opened before, but in exploring it our men turned out the fragments of burned bones and a singular whetstone. Lower down on the south are some other barrows; in one of which, was found a brass dart or arrow head. To the east is a long barrow.
From p82 of “The History of Ancient Wiltshire” by Sir Richard Colt Hoare, which can be seen on Wiltshire County Council’s website here:
wiltshire.gov.uk/community/gettextimage.php?id=2049
It sounds like the poor thing was being ploughed recently:
... the plowing up, in 1984, of a Neolithic settlement by Robin Hood’s Ball, not for pressing reasons of military imperative or national security but as preparation for the planting of kale to feed sport-shooters’ pheasants. Fortunately this unplanned catastrophe was put to good use by an intensive archaeological survey of the plowed zone, providing the first systematic information about the settlement.
(from Managing for Effective Archaeological Conservation: The Example of Salisbury Plain Military Training Area. By Roy Canham and Christopher Chippindale, in Journal of Field Archaeology, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Spring, 1988), pp. 53-65.)
I suppose this isn’t the stone Baza’s taken a picture of? But maybe another Bulford stone to search out I suppose.
.. a stone formerly in the Avon near Bulford, in the bend just south-west of Watergate Farm (SU 16054330 [this is at the foot of a slope crowned by a long barrow]). This is less than a metre across, and its upper side has been cut to form a square socket, and to the slab is fixed an iron ring possibly for mooring a boat. It is in fact a slab of oolitic limestone and has nothing to do with Stonehenge, yet it has already gathered ‘megalithic’ folklore.
A farmer with his team of oxen is said to have tried without success to move it from the river (Long 1876, 75, note 2). ‘An observer’ wrote in the Salisbury Times (11 March 1910) that ‘several attempts have been made to drag the stone from the river. Forty, and some say sixty oxen were employed, but it was never even moved.’ Similar traditions occur at the Rollright Stones and many other megalithic sites in Britain.
The stone was mentioned in the poem by F. Bowman (1823), 5:
No kindred relics boasts the neighbouring soil,
Save one rude rock, that rests its time-worn side
On Avon’s bed, and curbs his struggling tide.Scarcely compatible with the supposed immovability of this stone is another local belief that ‘whenever it is turned over it always rights itself again’ (Emslie 1915, 167).
When this stone was removed from the river ten or twelve years ago, the men allotted to the task were at first reluctant to have anything to do with it, believing that there was a curse on the stone. The latter is now in the garden of a house by Bulford Bridge (inf. Dr Isobel Smith and the Wessex Water Authority, Poole).
From The Legendary History and Folklore of Stonehenge
L. V. Grinsell
Folklore, Vol. 87, No. 1. (1976), pp. 5-20. The eminent Grinsell also reminds us in this article of another water bound stone at Figheldean, which Aubrey says was supposedly dropped on the way to Stonehenge* (Figheldean is a little further north, so curiously not really on the way at all).
Long’s work is ‘Stonehenge and its barrows’, and Emslie’s, ‘Scraps of Folklore’ in Folklore 26. Emslie has this to say:
Bulford Water Stone, near Amesbury, is a stone in the middle of the River Avon. On its north side is an iron ring, fixed in it, and which always lies upon it in a direction which is opposed to the current of the river. It has frequently been turned over so as to lie in the same direction as the current of the river, but has always returned to its original position by going against the current of the river. [collected 1896]
Here’s something a little earlier which I found in ‘The Beauties of Wiltshire’ by John Britton (1801):
About two miles north of Amesbury, on the banks of the Avon, is Bulford. Near this village are two large stones of the same kind as those at Stonehenge. One of them is situated in the middle of the river, and, as I am informed, has an iron ring fixed in it; but the waters being very high I could not see it.
The other is on the Downs, a little to the south-east of the village; and about a mile further up the valley is another, all evidently appertaining to the structure I have already described [i.e. Stonehenge]; but whether they were ever brought from the circle, or were left here on their passage, on whether they belonged to an avenue stationed between Stonehenge and Avebury, it is impossible to determine.
And a little more, on the stone that was in the water (this is from p229 of v1 of ‘Miscellaneous Tracts’ by William Withering – 1822). It’s from a letter by James Norris to Dr Withering, dated Feb9, 1798.
I was at Bulford again in August last, and conversed with the farmer who occupies the estate on which it lies; he assured me he had been upon it when a long drought had laid dry its surface, and that the ring is certainly of iron. But I found him inclined to invalidate the opinion of its antiquity, by relating a tradition, which I will here repeat: ‘it is said, that, formerly, a railing extended across the river at this place, to detain the fish: that the square cavitiy in the stone received one of the supporting posts: that another similar stone was once placed in the same river also, near the opposite bank, for the same use; and that the ring is of later date, and fixed only to attempt the removal of the block.’ Be this relation true or false, I cannot but think it improbable, at least, that so much needless trouble and expense should be incurred, when a post firmly fixed in the earth of each bank only, would have been fully adequate to the purpose. He says the nature of the stone is different from any of the three kinds at Stonehenge: that it is softer, and agrees with the productions of the Chilmark quarries, situated about fifteen miles south-west of Stonehenge and about twelve miles west of Sarum.
*From Bulford I went to Fighelden, and made many particular inquiries of aged and intelligent natives of the place concerning the stone said by Aubrey to lie in the river there. Their invariable reply was, ’ that none such was ever known to exist at Fighelden, or nearer than Bulford; where (added they) is to be seen one corresponding with the description.’ It is alsmost certain, then, I think, that the Bulford stone is the real object of that writer, who has fallen into a local error in the name, and in about three miles in the situation of the place.
There are lots of barrows up here. And there’s a bit of megalithic style folklore. But where is the stone?
A rock is set up at a four-crossroads on Gittisham Common. It is called the Witch’s Stone, for it is said that witches used to sacrifice babies on it. There is also said to be a treasure buried beneath it, and whenever it hears the church bells striking midnight, it descends to the River Sid to drink.
From p153 of The Folklore of Devon
Theo Brown
Folklore, Vol. 75, No. 3. (Autumn, 1964), pp. 145-160.
Things were different in prehistory. Contrary to rdavymed’s modern assessment, this long barrow has been inspiring at times. It seems to have been the focus for a later cemetery of Bronze Age round barrows – there are four close by and a number of others in the vicinity. It didn’t escape Roman attention either, as a burial with Samian pottery was found in the mound: it is after all but a step away from the Roman road and remains of the aqueduct that took water to Roman Dorchester. The barrow may also have a view over the confluence of the Cerne and the Frome below?
(info from the s.m. record on Magic).
This long barrow is on a spur of Bere Down, and overlooks the Bere valley below. It’s about 55m long but has been reduced to less than a metre high. Five sarsens protrude from the middle of the mound, so it’s a bit more exciting than your average ploughed longbarrow. The area is liberally scattered with groups of later round barrows.
(facts from the sm record on Magic)
Between these two [Kit’s Coty and the Countless Stones] a third dolmen is said to have existed within the memory of man, but no trace of it is now to be found.
In the rear of these groups, nearer the village, there exists, or existed, a line of great stones, extending from a place called Spring Farm, in a north-easterly direction, for a distance of three quarters of a mile, to another spot known as Hale Farm, (When I was there four years ago I was fortunate enough to find an old man, a stonemason, who had been employed in his youth in utilizing these stones. He went over the ground with me, and pointed out the position of those he remembered.) passing through Tollington, where the greater number of the stones are now found.
In front of the line near the centre at Tollington lie two obelisks, known to the country people as the coffin-stones – probably from their shape. They are 12 feet long by 4 to 6 broad, and about 2 or 3 feet thick. (It is extremely difficult to be precise about the dimensions. One is wholly buried in the earth, and its dimensions can only be obtained by probing; the other is half buried.) They appear to be partially hewn, or at least shaped, so as to resemble one another.
Besides these stones, which are all on the right bank of the river, there are several groups at or near Addington, about five miles to the westward of Aylesford. Two of these in the park at Addington have long been known to antiquaries, having been described and figured in the ‘Archaeologia’ in 1773. (Archaeologia,’ii. 1773, p. 107.) The first is a small circle, about 11 feet in diameter, the six stones comprising, it being 19 feet high, 7 wide, and 2 in thickness. Near it is the larger one of oval form, measuring 50 paces by 42 paces. The stones are generally smaller than those of the other circle.
The other groups or detached stones are described by Mr. Wright, (Wanderings of an Antiquary;, London, 1854, P. 175 et seqq.) who went over the ground with that excellent and venerable antiquary the Rev. L. B. Larking. They seem to have adopted the common opinion that an avenue of such stones existed all the way from Addington to Aylesford, but it seems to me that there is no sufficient evidence to justify this conclusion. Many of the stones seem natural boulders, and in no place is any alignment distinctly perceptible.
From chapter four of James Fergusson’s ‘Rude Stone Monuments’ (1864) which has been graciously added to the Olivaceous Megalithic Portal, here:
megalithic.co.uk/downloads/rude_stone/Rude_Stone_Monuments_Chapter_4.pdf
megalithic.co.uk/download.php?op=getit&lid=77
There are two Bronze Age barrows about 100m apart on Chipperfield Common: one at TL047012 and one at TL046012. They’re apparently on a marked ‘heritage walk’ so there’s no excuse to get lost. Also there are some nice heathy areas and some ancient sweet chestnuts to see.
There are three barrows in this wood. One is a Bronze Age bell barrow at TL214208. Two more barrows lie close to a public footpath at TL217209. They might be close together, but interestingly one is Bronze Age, and the other unusually dates from Roman times. The Roman one has steeper sides and is about 1.5m high; the native version is lower at 0.5m. There aren’t many of the Roman variety about and they do tend to be in this part of the country. It’s interesting to think about the occupant’s motivations for building such a barrow. Its adjacent model would have been 100s (if not 1000s) of years old at that time.
(info from the scheduled monument record on magic)
You’ll only see one round barrow here, and it’s quite sizeable, being 3.5m high. But there was actually another 25m to the east, which was lost by ploughing. I wonder what twist of fate led to one gaining itself a name, and the other disappearing. Can the ‘Ickle’ be to do with the ‘Icknield’ Way, which is close by? But it’s on a hill so I don’t know where the ‘ford’ must be from.
Some excavations were made in 1816, when a cremation burial was found, along with two bronze spear heads and a copper blade. A skeleton was also found in or near the mound – perhaps this was from a later era?
The barrow is not far from Wilbury Hill and the Icknield Way. You can probably see it quite well from the train between Hitchin and Letchworth.
(facts and figures from the scheduled monument record on Magic)
A photo of Wilbury Hill (the scheduled area of the fort is actually just behind these trees).
Wilbury Hill bears the traces of a univallate hillfort which was begun in the Late Bronze Age (c700BC). The banks and ditches were improved in the Iron Age, and the site was occupied in Roman times too. You might not be able to see much of what’s left of the two adjoining enclosures, but you’ll certainly get an idea of the fort’s lofty position and views. The fort is right on the prehistoric Icknield Way.
More details can be found in the scheduled monument record here:
magic.gov.uk/rsm/29387.pdf
The scheduled monument record calls this a bowl barrow, and there is another nearby on a similarly prominent point on the hills here, at Tingley Field Plantation. Knocking Knoll was partially excavated in 1856 by William Ransom from Hitchin, and pottery from the site is apparently held in the Hitchin Museum.
At Fermoy, the name given to a somewhat curious cromlech, “The Hag’s Bed,” interested me. I was at some trouble to learn the origin of the name, and fortunately our car-driver succeeded in finding an old man, who gave me the desired information..
“On yonder hill there lived, in days gone by, a giant and a giantess. They were called Shara and Sheela. One day Shara returned from his labours (wood-cutting) in the forest, and finding no dinner ready he was exceeding angry, and in his passion gave Sheela a severe wound with his axe on the shoulder. His passion was assuaged as soon as he saw the blood of his wife, and he carefully bound up the wound and nursed her for many weeks with great care.
Sheela did not, however, forgive Shara for the injury he had inflicted on her. She brooded on her wrong. Eventually she was so far recovered that Shara was able to leave her; and their stock of wood having fallen short, he proceeded to the forest for a fresh supply. Sheela watched her husband as he descended the hill, and, full of wrath, she seized her bed, and, as he was wading through the river, she flung it after him with a dreadful imprecation. The devil changed the bed into stone in its passage through the air. It fell on the giant, crushed him, and to this day he rests beneath the Hag’s Bed.
In the solitude which she had made she repented her crime, but she never forgave herself the sin. She sat on the hill-top, the melancholy monument of desolation, bewailing her husband’s loss, and the country around echoed with her lamentations. “Bad as Shara was, it is worse to be without him !” was her constant cry. Eventually she died of excess of grief her last words being, “Bad as Shara was, it is worse to be without him !”
“And,” said the old man, finishing his story, “whenever any trouble is coming upon Ireland, the voice of Sheela is heard upon the hill still repeating her melancholy lamentation.”
From “Popular Romances of the West of England” by Robert Hunt (1903 edition), online at the Sacred Texts Archive:
sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/prwe/prwe332.htm
St Piran has several stoney connections – for one, he travelled to Cornwall from Ireland on one.
On a boisterous day, a crowd of the lawless Irish assembled on the brow of a beetling cliff, with Piran in chains. By great labour they had rolled a huge millstone to the top of the hill, and Piran was chained to it. At a signal from one of the kings, the stone and the saint were rolled-to the edge of and suddenly over, the cliff intd the Atlantic. The winds were blowing tempestuously, the heavens were dark with clouds, and the waves white with crested foam. No sooner was Piran and the millstone launched into space, than the sun shone out brightly, casting the full lustre of its beams on the holy man, who sat tranquilly on the descending stone. The winds died away, and the waves became smooth as a mirror. The moment the millstone touched the water, hundreds were converted to Christianity who saw this miracle. St Piran floated on safely to Cornwall; he landed on the 5th of March on the sands which bear his name. He lived amongst the Cornish men until he attained the age of 206 years.
Another stoney story explains the origins of the black and white Cornish flag:
St Piran, or St Perran, leading his lonely life on the plains which now bear his name, devoted himself to the study of the objects which presented themselves to his notice. The good saint decorated the altar in his church with the choicest flowers, and his cell was adorned with the crystals which he could collect from the neighbouring rocks. In his wanderings on the sea-shore, St Perran could not but observe the numerous mineral, veins running through the slate-rocks forming the beautiful cliffs on this coast. Examples of every kind he collected; and on one occasion, when preparing his humble meal, a heavy black stone was employed to form a pan of the fireplace. The fire was more intense than usual, and a stream of beautiful white metal flowed out of the fire. Great was the joy of the saint; he perceived that God, in His goodness, had discovered to him something which would be useful to man.
From Robert Hunt’s “Popular Romances of the West of England”, now online at the excellent Sacred Texts Archive:
sacred-texts.com/neu/eng/prwe/index.htm
The St Piran Trust is “a non-profit-making charitable Trust which is committed to the development, protection and good administration of the historic sites on Gear Sands connected with St Piran” – and that includes looking after St Perran’s Round. This page contains lots of information on the site’s use over the last few centuries.
..there is another Trelleck tradition. If you ask your way to the three stones you will be answered, “The way to Harold’s Stones? Yes Miss,” and then directed. Specially will you be so answered if your informant is at all above the labouring class, and the information will be added that “Harold he did set them up because of a great battle he did win, and if you goes on, Miss, you’ll see the great mound where they did bury all the dead.”
The facts of that battle and that victory are real enough. The late Professor Freeman, in the second volume of his Norman Conquest, under the year 1063, quotes the chronicler Geraldus Cambrensis to this effect, that “Each scene of conflict was marked with a trophy of stone bearing the proud legend, ‘Here Harold conquered.’” It is quite possible that Earl Harold may have taken to himself stones obviously not of his own raising, though there is no trace of an inscription on any of the menhirs at Trelleck..
Oh whatever. You lost me once you’d made your snobby comment about the labouring classes, Ms Eyre. She goes on to debate at length and somewhat pointlessly the roots of the legend. From:
Folk-Lore of the Wye Valley
Margaret Eyre
Folklore, Vol. 16, No. 2. (Jun. 24, 1905), pp. 162-179.
The Sandy Lodge fort would have been first occupied in the very early Iron Age (according to information on the ‘Magic’ schedule). It probably just had a wooden palisade rather than a more hefty earthen bank and ditch. Now the area has been disturbed by quarrying in places, but as the fort used a natural promontory, it might not be too difficult to work out where it might have been . It would only have been 150m from the Galley Hill fort, but this was probably used later? It’s a nice place to visit (nature trails go through this area – it is part of the RSPB headquarters)and you can get a feel for the view its inhabitants would have had, out over the flat countryside below.
I found this article in the Biggleswade Chronicle (11th July 1969):
Students excavate Middle Stone Age site at Sandy.
A spur of land at The Lodge, Sandy, headquarters of The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, was the scene last week of an archaeological excavation by 20 students from Putteridge Bury College of Education, Luton. The excavation, or ‘dig’, was led by Mr James Dyer, a lecturer at the college and editor of The Bedfordshire Magazine.
Mr Dyer explained that the site, a sandy spur overlooking the Ivel valley at Sandy, was first occupied extensively by Middle Stone Age people about 8,000 BC. These people lived by fishing in the Ivel and hunting animals and game in the pine forests on the greensand ridge. Excavation carried out last year and last week produced many tiny flint implements which formed the tips to arrows and spears. The settlement area of these people was extensive, and probably stretched as far north as the present site of the TV mast on Sandy Heath.
Mr Dyer said during the Iron Age period, a farmstead was constructed on the hill-top, and pottery and more flints found by himself and the students revealed the date of occupation as about 300 BC. He went on: “For some unknown reason it was considered necessary to defend the hill-spur and a great bank of sand was thrown up, 10 feet high and 30 feet wide, held in position by a dry stone wall on the outside, and a ramp of turf on the inside. Material to build the bank came from a great irregular ditch dug into the sandstone, which measured some 40 feet wide and eight feet deep in places. The defended farmstead was entered along a rock causeway, which had a stout wooden gate at one end.”
It is thought the farm was probably superseded as a defensive position by the hill fort known as Galley Hill, on the adjoining hill-spur. Both are in view from the Roman fort on Biggleswade Common, which was excavated about 14 years ago. A third Iron Age defensive work, misnamed Caesar’s Camp, overlooks the railway station at Sandy. all of which indicate a rather restless population in the area prior to the Roman conquest.
“A dragon once lived on Bignor Hill, where ridges made by its coils can be seen.”
It doesn’t seem wholly unlikely that this folklore could refer to the enclosure, which is slightly along the ridge from Bignor Hill. The area also has many Bronze age barrows. Folklore from the Sussex County Magazine, III, 1929, p552, by F.J. Bulstrode.
In 1540 Leland described Dray’s Ditches, three miles north of Luton, as “longe trenches, as they had been for Men of warre”.
I have not read the original, but found this exerpt in Notes and Queries for January 1962, p2.

Galley Hill on the left (with barrows, somewhere), Warden Hill on the right, and Drays Ditches would be somewhere in the middle. The Icknield Way passes along the front.

It was far away, I know. I took it from the flat land below the ridge. The knoll is, I think, the small bump at centre top, with an interestingly shaped natural bump further forward called Knocking Hoe (faintly similar at least from this angle and millennium).
Cwm Ferman seems to run between this hill fort and ‘Waun Twmpath’, which Coflein describes as a motte.
My attention was drawn to this valley by a man from whom I asked my way on top of Pembrey Mountain. After answering my question he volunteered the additional information that “Over there is Cwm Verman where the Little People lived.”
A week later when trying to find the way to Cwm Verman I asked two people where the “Little People” lived, and they replied, “Oh Bendith y Mammau (i.e. the Blessings of the Mothers) you mean.” To find the fairies described in both these ways in the same district is interesting because it is unusual.
The Little People of Cwm Verman
G. Arbour Stephens
Folklore, Vol. 50, No. 4. (Dec., 1939), pp. 385-386.
Like at many a megalithic monument, the stones of Stonehenge cannot be counted. Or at least, the poet Sir Philip Sidney couldn’t count them. He made mention of this in his ‘The 7 Wonders of England’, written pre-1581.
“Neere Wilton sweete, huge heapes of stones are found,
But so confusde that neither any eye
Can count them just, nor reason try,
What force brought them to so unlikely ground.”
Perhaps it was common knowledge and not just a personal problem with figures, since Alexander Craig mentions it in ‘To His Calidonian Mistris’ (published 1604):
“And when I spide those stones on Sarum plaine,
Which Merlin by his Magicke brought, some saine,
By night from farr I-erne to this land,
Where yet as oldest Monuments they stand:
And though they be but few for to behold,
Yet can they not (it is well knowne) be told.
Those I compared unto my plaints and cryes
Whose totall summe no numers can comprise.”
..a literary reference occurs in William Rowley’s The Birth of Merlin, a play published in 1662, but believed.. to have been staged forty or fifty years previously.
..and when you die,
I will erect a monument upon the verdant plains of Salisbury:
no king shall have so high a sepulchre,
with pendulous stones that I will hang by art,
Where neither lime nor mortar shall be used,
a dark enigma to thy memory,
for none shall have the power to number them.That the tradition was well known is indicated by the fact that King Charles II spent October 7, 1651, ‘reckoning and rereckoning its stones in order to beguile the time’. Colonel Robert Phelips, who accompanied his sovereign, added, ‘the King’s Arithmetike gave the lye to that fabulous tale.
Celia Fiennes, travelling in about 1690, had no trouble, and ‘told them often, and bring their number to 91.‘
Gathered in
The ‘Countless Stones’: A Final Reckoning
S. P. Menefee
Folklore, Vol. 86, No. 3/4. (Autumn – Winter, 1975), pp. 146-166.
Drawing of a Stone-With-A-Hole in the main Rollrights circle, through which can be spied the Whispering Knights.
Perhaps Bryony’s tale comes originally from the version in ‘Sussex Local Legends’ by Jacqueline Simpson (Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 3). This contains a written version of that told by L.N. Candlin, in 1971, from her childhood recollections (c1915), and includes the same unusual word, ‘midriff’.
[Hilaire Belloc told the story] of how St Dunstan pulled the Devil’s nose with red-hot tongs at Mayfield, making this a sequel to the [Devil’s Dyke story below]. I have also recently heard a friend of mine associate the two tales, but in the reverse order; according to him, when the Devil felt the hot tongs at Mayfield, he leapt into the air and hurtled out to sea to cool his nose, kicking the Downs with his hoof as he passed overhead. The Dyke is the mark left by his kick. My informant thinks he learnt this unusual variant at Mayfield, not in the neighbourhood of the Dyke itself.
p210 of
Sussex Local Legends
Jacqueline Simpson
Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 3. (Autumn, 1973), pp. 206-223.
[The Devil’s Dyke] is a deep, narrow cleft in the north face of the Downs, beginning near Poynings and pointing southwest towards the sea. The hill above it is a famous beauty-spot with a superb view – and also with a cafe and souvenir shop which energetically exploit the legend. But in spite of this commercialisation, it is interesting to see what a number of variations exist in written and oral sources, and how many landscape features have been swept into the orbit of this ever-popular tale. It is far from being as stereotyped as I used to assume it was.
All but one of the versions I know agree that the Devil dug the Dyke because he was furious at the piety of villages to the north of the Downs, and wanted to let in the sea to drown them. He started near Poynings and dug vigorously, having sworn to finish the job in a single night, until something occurred to stop him -- but what? Here versions differ.
The most popular variant, which can be traced back as far as the late eighteenth century, says that during the night an old woman was woken by the noise, and guessed what the Devil was up to. So she lit a candle and put it in her window with a sieve in front of it, so that it made a dim globe of light. The Devil looked round, and thought this was the sun rising; he could hardly believe his eyes, but then he heard a cock crow -- for the old woman, just to make sure, knocked her cockerel off his perch. So off he flew, leaving the job half done.
This version still circulates orally, as well as in guidebooks, and is often enlivened by extra topographical details, as that the Devil as he dug sent huge clods of earth hurtling through the air, which became the Caburn, or Chanctonbury, or various other hills.
Some say that when he flew off he went out over the Channel where a lump of clay fell from his hoof and became the Isle of Wight; others, that he bounded northwards into Surrey, where the impact of his landing formed the Devil’s Punchbowl.
On the other hand, there are versions which ignore the old woman and say the Weald was saved by a saint, though they disagree on which one should have the credit: an unnamed hermit weilding a Cross, said the Penny Post in 1837; or St Cuthman, helped by a nun whose prayers gave the Devil cramp and whose blessed candle tricked him, said Harrison Ainsworth in Ovingdean Grange in 1879, followed by the official guide-book on sale at the Dyke; or St Dunstan, as Hillaire Belloc maintained in a lively retelling in The Four Men in 1912..
From p209/210 in
Sussex Local Legends
Jacqueline Simpson
Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 3. (Autumn, 1973), pp. 206-223.
Her sources in the latter part of the text were local people in the 1960s/70s.
Some will tell you this is a mediaeval fortification. But as a handy natural mound overlooking the stream below – well surely. Pastscape says a Lower Palaeolithic Handaxe was found here in the 1880s. I know, this doesn’t necessarily mean anything. But until the Magic pdf arrives to describe this Scheduled Monument, perhaps it’s enough.
One of our best [Sussex] fairy legends was published in 1854 from the narrative of a certain Will Fowlington, who had turned seventy at the time and had learnt it from a great-uncle; it is set at Burlow Castle..
“When I was a liddle boy and lived with my gurt uncle, old Jan Duly, dere was an old place dey used to call Burlow Castle. It warn’t much ov a castle -- onny a few walls like -- but it had been a famous place in de time when dere was a king in every county. Well, whatever it had been afore, at de time I speak on, it were de very hem ov a place for pharisees [fairies], and nobody didn’t like to go by it ahter dark for fear on um.
One dee as Chols Packham, uncle’s grandfather (I’ve heerd uncle tell de story a dunnamany times) was at plough up dere, just about cojer time, he heerd a queer sort of a noise right down under de ground’ dat frightened him uncommonly, sure-lie...”The story is too long to quote, but it develops into a fine version of ML 5080, ‘Food from the Fairies’, with the motif of the broken peel.
How cruel to leave us hanging like that. The original, if you can find it, is in M.A. Lower’s ‘Contributions to Literature’ 1854, p158-61. The above is a quote from p208 of Sussex Local Legends
Jacqueline Simpson
Folklore, Vol. 84, No. 3. (Autumn, 1973), pp. 206-223.
I think a long paper could be written on the silly way people used to write down dialects.
***
Some more of the story:
Collected pre-1852 (pre-1840?) by Mark Anthony Lower from Will Fowington, a 70-year old South Downsman who had heard the story from his uncle, Jan Duly. Earthwork (medieval?). Charles Packham, the narrator’s great great uncle was ploughing at Burlow Castle, a noted ‘Pharisee’ haunt. About ‘cojer’ time (11.00 A.M.), he was frightened by a voice coming from a crack in the ground, calling for help. Harry, his mate, denied the existence of fairies, but hearing the voice again, Charles inquired what was the problem and was told ‘I’ve been a bakin’, ... and have broken my peel ... and I dunnow what upon de airth to do.’ ‘Under the earth,’ silently thought the ploughman, but he said to put the peel up, and he would try to mend it. Although it was no larger than a ‘bren-cheese knife... not big enough to hold a gingey-bread nut hardly,’ Charles refrained from laughing in order not to run the risk of offending the fairies. He took out some tin tacks, and, using his knife as a hammer, mended and returned the peel. Harry was unbelieving when informed of this, but the next day, at the same time, Charles was rewarded with a bowl of beer-sops. He hoped to keep the bowl as proof, but it slipped from his hand and dashed itself to pieces. Harry again was unbelieving, but the fairies punished him for his comments. (He fell sick and died a year to the hour that he had first insulted them.)
From A Cake in the Furrow
S. P. Menefee
Folklore, Vol. 91, No. 2 (1980), pp. 173-192
In Jacqueline Simpson’s “Sussex Local Legends”
(Folklore, Vol. 84, 1973) she mentions in a footnote on p207 that:
“I have come upon a cutting from the Worthing Gazette of 16 Oct, 1935 referring to Aaron’s Calf being buried on Highdown Hill – yet another site with a hill-fort.”
The Aaron’s Calf story is better known from The Trundle.
St. Just, from the Land’s End district, once paid a visit to St. Keverne, who entertained him for several days to the best of his power. After his departure his host missed some valuable relics, and determined to go in pursuit of his late guest, and try, if possible, to get them from him.
As he was passing over Crousa-down, about two miles from St. Keverne church, he pocketed three large stones, each weighing about a-quarter of a ton, to use if St. Just should offer any resistance. He overtook him at a short distance from Breage and taxed him with the theft, which was indignantly denied.
From words the saints came to blows, and St. Keverne flung his stones with such effect that St. Just ran off, throwing down the relics as he ran. The stones still lie where they fell, about four hundred yards from Pengersick Lane.
Violence and theft? From Saints? And they say things are worse these days.
p22 in
Cornish Folk-Lore
M. A. Courtney
The Folk-Lore Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1. (1887), pp. 14-61.
Precautions have to be taken against changelings, and at Chudleigh mothers used to tie their babies to them in bed at night for fear of the pixies..
A keeper and his wife used to live at Chudleigh, near the rocks, whose holes the pixies “bide” in. This couple had two children, and one morning when the wife had dressed the eldest she let her run away while she dressed the baby. Presently her husband came and asked her “where the little maid was to?” For she was gone and was not to be found. They searched high and low for days; the neighbours came to help, and at last bloodhounds were to be sent for. But one morning some young men thought they would go and help themselves to some nuts from a clump of nut-trees not far from the keeper’s house, and at the farther side they came suddenly on the child, undressed, but well and happy, and not at all starved, playing with her toes, or toads; I do not know which. The pixies were supposed to have stolen the child, and are still firmly believed to have been responsible for her disappearance.
Bad parenting blamed on the pixies. At least they looked after her, and they didn’t even swap her. This story on p213 of
Devonshire Folklore
Lady Rosalind Northcote
Folklore, Vol. 11, No. 2. (Jun., 1900), pp. 212-217.