|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: Stonehenge 35 messages | Select a forum: |
| [/quote] Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind. I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that. But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........[/quote] These wrecked and buried 'possible circles' are certainly interesting, to say the least. Seen quite a few in my time and have left thinking 'are you sure?' The Mam C and I didn't venture here when visiting the excellent nearby Bedd yr Afanc some years back precisely because of the lack of above-ground features. Would be beneficial for a balanced view to understand the pros and cons, since MPP does have a bit of a reputation - does he not? - which clearly galvanises opinion. Reply | with quote |  13th February 2021ce 11:03 In reply to: Re: Stonehenge (moss) |
Messages in this topic: |
|