Forums | Re: A response from Frances Lynch – The Modern Antiquarian.com

The Modern Antiquarian

Home	Latest Posts	Forums	Maps	Help

Browse Sites	News	Blog	Contributors	The Books

Head To Head

The Modern Antiquarian

Circle 278 Forum

Start a topic | Search

Circle 278

Re: A response from Frances Lynch

43 messages

Select a forum:

Well, the CARN database shows 20+ monuments within a couple of hundred metres of the "278" location. If there were accurate positional information for these we would not have to ask people which one was which, we would know. If we knew the site number we could look up the reference and answer the question ourselves.
I notice modern archaeologists are not above using GPS occasionally, I wonder why?

Reply | with quote

Posted by Keith D
18th May 2004ce
22:23

(greywether, Mar 16, 2004, 14:28)

Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Mar 16, 2004, 17:39)
- Re: Two views on 278 (baza, Mar 16, 2004, 18:31)
- Re: Two views on 278 (stubob, Mar 16, 2004, 22:36)
Re: Two views on 278 (baza, Apr 05, 2004, 19:08)
- Re: Two views on 278 (FourWinds, Apr 05, 2004, 19:21)
  - Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Apr 05, 2004, 20:07)
  - Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Apr 05, 2004, 20:07)
    - Re: Sorting it out - Eds? (greywether, Apr 05, 2004, 20:25)
      - Re: Sorting it out - Eds? (FourWinds, Apr 05, 2004, 21:11)
  - Re: Two views on 278 (Kammer, Apr 05, 2004, 21:46)
    - Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Apr 06, 2004, 10:42)
      - Re: Two views on 278 (Kammer, Apr 06, 2004, 12:50)
        Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Apr 19, 2004, 09:49)
        Re: Two views on 278 (Kammer, Apr 19, 2004, 12:43)
        Re: Two views on 278 (greywether, Apr 19, 2004, 13:13)
        Re: Two views on 278 (Kammer, Apr 19, 2004, 14:27)
        Pushing for a clear understanding of this area (TimP, May 05, 2004, 12:09)
        Feature formerly known as Circle 278 (TimP, May 05, 2004, 12:11)
        Megalithics Website Contri. (TimP, May 05, 2004, 12:13)
        Another line of enquiry (TimP, May 05, 2004, 12:16)
        Re: Megalithics Website Contri. (Keith D, May 05, 2004, 16:04)
        Re: Pushing for a clear understanding of this area (baza, May 05, 2004, 17:23)
        Grinsell (baza, May 05, 2004, 17:42)
        Re: Grinsell (baza, May 05, 2004, 17:55)
        Re: A response from Frances Lynch (TimP, May 18, 2004, 20:34)
        Re: A response from Frances Lynch (greywether, May 18, 2004, 21:01)
        Re: A response from Frances Lynch (Keith D, May 18, 2004, 22:23)
        Re: Jumping hurdles in a flat race. (greywether, May 18, 2004, 23:23)
        Re: Jumping hurdles in a flat race. (Keith D, May 19, 2004, 09:05)
        Re: Jumping hurdles in a flat race. (ShropshireTraveller, Jun 02, 2004, 08:10)
        Coflein - more confusion into the matter? (ShropshireTraveller, Jul 26, 2004, 19:39)
        Re: Coflein - more confusion into the matter? (baza, Jul 27, 2004, 00:28)
        naming / renaming? (ShropshireTraveller, Aug 01, 2004, 20:06)
        Re: naming / renaming? (FourWinds, Aug 01, 2004, 21:59)
        Re: naming / renaming? (baza, Aug 02, 2004, 09:37)
        Re: naming / renaming? (FourWinds, Aug 02, 2004, 09:51)
        Re: naming / renaming? (baza, Aug 02, 2004, 22:59)
        Re: naming / renaming? (baza, Aug 02, 2004, 09:48)
        Re: Jumping hurdles in a flat race. (StoneLifter, Jul 27, 2004, 04:50)
        Re: Jumping hurdles in a flat race. (ShropshireTraveller, Aug 01, 2004, 20:10)
        Visiting on Friday morning (ShropshireTraveller, Aug 30, 2004, 18:05)

Terms & Conditions | Home | Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Top of page

The Modern Antiquarian

In reply to:

1 reply:

Messages in this topic: