I`ve found this in the SMR:
National Monument No.33951
<I>A recumbent tabular stone 1.4m in length situated on the edge
of Overton Down includes grooves and a dished area consistent with its use
for the shaping, whetting and polishing of Neolithic stone axes. Excavation
around the stone in 1963 demonstrated that it had originally been upright,
whilst an iron wedge and a coin showed that it had been split in the 13th
century AD.</I>
So it is protected (theoretically, within the law) and there`s no need for secrecy, is there?
baz
Reply | with quote | Posted by baza 7th August 2003ce 21:17 |
Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Moth, Aug 04, 2003, 16:16)- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Kammer, Aug 04, 2003, 16:48)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2003, 16:50)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2003, 16:57)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (baza, Aug 04, 2003, 17:25)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (gm, Aug 04, 2003, 18:17)
- As another non-finder (juamei, Aug 04, 2003, 20:05)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Randall, Aug 04, 2003, 20:14)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (Ike, Aug 06, 2003, 18:27)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (baza, Aug 07, 2003, 21:17)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (megadread, Jun 25, 2008, 23:25)
- Re: Secrecy and safety - opinions? (FourWinds, Jun 26, 2008, 06:47)
|
|