close
more_vert

Ps..

A quick look at wiki..

"Our (LR) experiment was a definite positive response for life, but a lot of people have claimed that it was a false positive for a variety of reasons."[13] Most scientists now believe that the data were due to inorganic chemical reactions of the soil; however, this view may be changing after the recent discovery of near-surface ice near the Viking landing zone.[14] Some scientists still believe the results were due to living reactions.” Wiki.

So some truth in what I say..more delving on that needed..

And this is wiki..we know it’s a heavily censored site towing mainstream lines?

Further to that what’s the point of doing experiments such that the results aren’t going to give a clear result?..matter of opinion? If that is indeed the case.

My point was that no living bacteria have been discovered on Mars. If they had it would be seriously bigger news and, best of all, The Pope's next encyclical would contain some VERY nifty back peddling.