close
more_vert

..Source...NASA!!

Yeah a bit of remedial science for them..eh?

What would be wrong in your book about the results?

Ps..

A quick look at wiki..

"Our (LR) experiment was a definite positive response for life, but a lot of people have claimed that it was a false positive for a variety of reasons."[13] Most scientists now believe that the data were due to inorganic chemical reactions of the soil; however, this view may be changing after the recent discovery of near-surface ice near the Viking landing zone.[14] Some scientists still believe the results were due to living reactions.” Wiki.

So some truth in what I say..more delving on that needed..

And this is wiki..we know it’s a heavily censored site towing mainstream lines?

Further to that what’s the point of doing experiments such that the results aren’t going to give a clear result?..matter of opinion? If that is indeed the case.