Rudston Monolith forum 7 room
Image by spencer
Rudston Monolith

Large stones

close
moss M
moss Feb 15, 2017 15:46:48

Whilst standing in awe yesterday at the size of the Rudston monolith, what better stone to meet then on Valentine's day? It struck me that Stukeley's Obelisk stone, destroyed all those years ago, would have been somewhat similar, its height I think 21 feet, the theory that you find on the Avebury Web is that it paired with a female stone, presumably for a mating ceremony via a shadow....

http://www.avebury-web.co.uk/the_obelisk.html

T tjj
tjj Feb 15, 2017 17:35:59
Replying to moss

moss wrote:
Whilst standing in awe yesterday at the size of the Rudston monolith, what better stone to meet then on Valentine's day? It struck me that Stukeley's Obelisk stone, destroyed all those years ago, would have been somewhat similar, its height I think 21 feet, the theory that you find on the Avebury Web is that it paired with a female stone, presumably for a mating ceremony via a shadow....

http://www.avebury-web.co.uk/the_obelisk.html

So perhaps the Rudston Monolith and the Obelisk stone are/were phallic symbols? There doesn't seem to be any evidence that there was another different shaped stone by the Rudston one - as in Avebury. But why not indeed - its as good a theory as any. And the paired stones on the West Kennett Avenue have been said to represent male and female too.

R ryaner
ryaner Feb 16, 2017 07:57:55
Replying to moss

Rudston=rude stone?

C carol27
carol27 Feb 16, 2017 08:53:54
Replying to moss

There's speculation that the Rudston monolith extends as much underground as can be seen above ground; imagine that!

Like all websites everywhere, we use cookies.