Rudston Monolith forum 7 room
Image by fitzcoraldo
Rudston Monolith

Large stones

close
more_vert

moss wrote:
Whilst standing in awe yesterday at the size of the Rudston monolith, what better stone to meet then on Valentine's day? It struck me that Stukeley's Obelisk stone, destroyed all those years ago, would have been somewhat similar, its height I think 21 feet, the theory that you find on the Avebury Web is that it paired with a female stone, presumably for a mating ceremony via a shadow....

http://www.avebury-web.co.uk/the_obelisk.html

So perhaps the Rudston Monolith and the Obelisk stone are/were phallic symbols? There doesn't seem to be any evidence that there was another different shaped stone by the Rudston one - as in Avebury. But why not indeed - its as good a theory as any. And the paired stones on the West Kennett Avenue have been said to represent male and female too.

I suspect there were more monuments at/near Rudston than there are now. It's not an area well-represented by lots of standing stones, but it's also quite agricultural so stuff will have disappeared, I guess timber might have played a role too.

Funnily enough, June, your post made me think of something I read recently. "An old woman in the village informed Mr. Allen, who published his History of Yorkshire in 1829, that she could remember the remains of a similar block of stone, which was situated some yards to the east of the present obelisk."

That could be sheer piffle though.

That's from a footnote in this
https://archive.org/stream/historyandtopog00whelgoog#page/n502/mode/2up

but it's not in Mr Allen's book though, at least that I can find.

You'd think a second stone would stick in folklore. But maybe people actually have short memories. But wouldn't it be written down somewhere? Or the place even be called Rud stones?!
https://archive.org/stream/anewandcomplete00hollgoog#page/n137/mode/2up/search/rudston