juamei wrote:
At work else I'd reply further, but tjj highlighted it perfectly.. Neither ED or TJJ know the full facts but have jumped to the assumption that he didn't do it with malice and that the penalty befits the crime. We are all working on the facts available as (I assume) none of us were in court.
Excuse me! I think what I said was there was a possibility one of his workers did it out of ignorance. I also said I don't know the full facts ... the penalty does seem lenient compared to the one meted out for chopping a tree down. For the record I'm done having confrontational exchanges on forums but until I'm thrown off reserve the right to express an opinion from time to time. Its simple to me, will he pay enough to have the henge restored? If no, then he isn't paying enough.