Silbury Hill forum 180 room
Image by Jane
Silbury Hill

Silbury's future?  (1) lock

close
more_vert

who's sniping who? and first too! I'm just replying in a like manner....ok?

Surely when an issue is being discussed the argument has to take two sides and hopefully a consensus will be arrived at? Attacking a particular person doesnt help the argument in question. Nigel feels strongly about the issue of Silbury Hill, Do you have an opinion one way or the other about the grouting or keeping the tunnel open? We still don't know, you sidetrack the subject elsewhere. Nigel is a good ranter, he brings the issue to the forefront, see his metal detecting work over the past few months, he's not paranoic about the subject just passionate and lets rip at a few archaeologists now and then..... HA draws the attention of people to what is happening to the monuments and landscapes around them, it takes an independent stand and an independent view from the standard bodies that are supposed to protect them; something you can hopefully do in a democracy without being shouted down......
Moss (also an HA member)
p.s. Radio 4 prog. buddhist thinking , give victory, take defeat. No I could'nt do it either but there is always the middle ground......................................

"and lets rip at a few archaeologists now and then..... "

or even all of them....

"Yes it is, and it's wrong, and the archaeologists who look the other way in droves are active partners in it. Sod them all. Where's morality in public affairs? What sort of profession sees huge wrongdoing and keeps quiet about it?"

and as I've just said, some of my good friends are archaeologists and they are just as passionate about Silbury and "stones" as any of you......