It takes a lot to get me wound up these days and I did delete it and say sorry :-)

It seems to be you who favours inaction, no one else, so I don't know why you're having a pop at a bunch of people who obviously care a whole heap more than you do.

Was your mum attacked by an information sign when you were in the womb?

I've just come across this posted from you Earthstopper:

"Yes and if we really want to get real we could post prohibition notices from Heritage inAction. Case solved - cue more four lettered words from Four Winds who just has to spit out his dummy when anyone holds a different view to his own."

I'm doubly puzzled -

First, no-one from Heritage Action had been involved in this spat (perhaps you thought otherwise?). So why the sideswipe, out of the blue?

Secondly, could you explain the evidence on which you based your opinion that HA is inactive? I'm agog.