Heather Burning

close

I saw a comment in one of the threads here recently about the threat to some stones from burning heather. During the recent spell of dry weather here, it seemed that the whole range of hills to the south of Dublin were on fire. Venturing up there recently I see that the whole of Kilakee mountain has been torched. Even more worrying, from a megalithic viewpoint, fire has razed the whole of the north-east side of Seahan Hill which has 4 recorded neolithic monuments. The fire didn't reach the summit where the tombs and cairn are, but that was only because of luck rather than design.

What I'd like to know is are these fires set deliberately? By vandals? Or sheep-farmers? And what do the authorities think? I know there may be policy differences between blighty and here but there was zilch on the news about what seemed to me to be fairly large fires.

Of course, for the megalithically-minded, there's always the possibility that the fires burning back the heather and gorse and the subsequent wind and rain erosion will reveal new, previously undiscovered treasures. But that dubious 'benefit' aside, what about the existing monuments? Does nobody care? (Don't answer that last question – I already know!)

Andy

Hiya Andy, I dunno which thread, though I'd be interested to read it too, if you should find it.

ryaner wrote:
What I'd like to know is are these fires set deliberately?
The ones here in Northumberland seem to be connected with grouse shooting. As I understand it, the heather is burnt off to promote fresh growth, which in turn, attracts the birds.

I saw some evidence of dodgy burning on Doddington moor recently, which came a bit too close to some rock art. Like the cairns you mention, it appeared that the fire missed the carvings more by chance than design.

Fire ain't good for old rocks.

It occurs to me that vegetation must have burned in such places many many times.

Therefore if the megalithic remains.......remain, maybe the heat exposure doesn't last that long as the fire passes by, preventing serious heat exposure as might happen if fuel were burned ON the megaliths.

Heather burning is part of moorland management especially on grouse moors. Apparently the male grouse need some long heather some short heather and some medium length heather to enable him to hit his grousy groove thang, which is why you see all those patches.
It's kinda ironic that if a moor is not burned and the heather controlled then the moor is at risk of a serious fire as was the case with Fylingdales Moor.
As for Bracken, it's nasty assed stuff chocka full of carcinogens and home to a multitude of mothersuckin ticks. It's just a nasty invasive plant that we used to control by harvesting it for all sorts of puposes but now tend to leave alone. I don't think burning promotes bracken growth, I'd say that a managed moor has less bracken but is often far from free of the stuff.
I guess we could say that fire occurs naturally on moorland and is one of natures great levellers. However it should be noted that moorlands are essentially man-made deserts, monuments to mans prehistoric conquest of the landscape.

Don't know about Ireland. In N. Yorkshire heather is burned back periodically to promote new shoots for grouse feeding. It doesn't hurt stones. In fact, the largest moor-fire in living memory has just revealed 150+ previously unknown stones on Fylingdales Moor. Fear not.