close
more_vert

> It seems you have no interest in this subject (then why post)

Indeed! Why would I post if I have no interest? Your assumption is incorrect. I would not reply to a post that I don't wish to reply to.

I feel that CW has encompassed what his beliefs are in a completely unarguable way. Therefore, there is no argument! He does what he does, and believes what he believes, and doesn't offend or interfere with anyone else or their beliefs. Perfect belief system if you ask me! Is it not so that a person's beliefs are a completely personal thing? If many people believe the same thing, then it's simply many people's own personal beliefs. He doesn't need to preach, and so doesn't. What's not to like? ;o) Leave the preaching the more insecure belief systems, I say!

And that is all I'm gonna say on the matter, I'm afraid, cos this ain't no religious discussion forum..! :o)

G x

encompassed his beliefs.......as they say up ere he said nowt or ardly owt....therefore how can he of encompassed????? As for unarguable ,well come on that is both naive and simplistic.I never implied or stated i disliked what he said! without much substance there is very little to dislike.'perfect belief system' not really sure where that one is going! As for insecure belief systems (archeocentric or scientiocentric or materiocentric) well! and 'preaching', to posit a view or theory does not always constitute preaching, as you must be aware.'this aint no religious discussion forum'I am afraid I have seen evidence of many belief systems in here (do i have to be as basic as to inform you scepticism, atheism etc etc are all belief systems) therefore i would suggest a less isolationist, and reductionalist approach!

I think I'd have a problem with any belief system that presents itself in an "unarguable" way, myself. Not that I have a problem with Cursuswalker - certainly agree that we should appreciate/enjoy these sites without impacting on them.