encompassed his beliefs.......as they say up ere he said nowt or ardly owt....therefore how can he of encompassed????? As for unarguable ,well come on that is both naive and simplistic.I never implied or stated i disliked what he said! without much substance there is very little to dislike.'perfect belief system' not really sure where that one is going! As for insecure belief systems (archeocentric or scientiocentric or materiocentric) well! and 'preaching', to posit a view or theory does not always constitute preaching, as you must be aware.'this aint no religious discussion forum'I am afraid I have seen evidence of many belief systems in here (do i have to be as basic as to inform you scepticism, atheism etc etc are all belief systems) therefore i would suggest a less isolationist, and reductionalist approach!