Don,t get me wrong, I do not have ulterior motives! I am in fact interested in the stones and as for my language, interface etc i was trying to get a honest responce to these questions without showing my own scepticism or bias. It seems that there are in fact numerous beliefs/theories to the use and reason for these 'big stones' yet to many are afraid to propound said theories without being ridiculed! I probably would in fact challenge most theories from 'those of the ilk' but I hope it would be a usefull and illuminating debate. As to those posting as Hine and carroll I am myself dubious as to who they really are and why they are posting ( although i have some knowledge ;I knew them both on a personal basis; of both characters and believe their input would be constructive informative and lively) I however do understand that this site has a belief bias towards archeocentric theology and as such will endeavour to take such into account.............thanks Muddy

> It seems you have no interest in this subject (then why post)

Indeed! Why would I post if I have no interest? Your assumption is incorrect. I would not reply to a post that I don't wish to reply to.

I feel that CW has encompassed what his beliefs are in a completely unarguable way. Therefore, there is no argument! He does what he does, and believes what he believes, and doesn't offend or interfere with anyone else or their beliefs. Perfect belief system if you ask me! Is it not so that a person's beliefs are a completely personal thing? If many people believe the same thing, then it's simply many people's own personal beliefs. He doesn't need to preach, and so doesn't. What's not to like? ;o) Leave the preaching the more insecure belief systems, I say!

And that is all I'm gonna say on the matter, I'm afraid, cos this ain't no religious discussion forum..! :o)

G x