close

In a miscellaneous post for Careg-y-Bwci mention was made of it being presently considered as a Roman structure because of a Roman road's proximity, against which the poster said that it was more that Roman roads often went by prehistoric monuments. Well boys and girls, whisper it quietly that many of the Roman roads were comprised of (usually smaller) sections of prehistoric trackways and roads joined up (just as they in turn became part of our modern roads and even motorways). In like manner major linear prehistoric earthworks were taken over by the likes of Offa's Dyke.

It always amazes me when I come upon a long, long stretch of very straight road in Ireland. If it was in England you'd definitely think to yourself that 'the Romans musta built this', but you know they didn't. It is also obvious that the route is ancient, so some one else must have built a very straight track there a long time ago.

When you see the tracks the Iron Age bog roads took - straight as a very straight arrow - you get the feeling that those road builders didn't like to mess around either.

I think I saw someone suggest that, right across Europe, most of the Roman roads were built upon the pre-existing roads of the Celts, but I can't remember where I read it.

> ...the poster said that it was more that Roman roads
> often went by prehistoric monuments.

Don't listen to that bloke. He talks a load of rubbish.

:-)#


>...Roman roads were comprised of (usually smaller)
> sections of prehistoric trackways and roads joined up...

I realised that when I wrote the post, but it's such a big
area to debate that I opted for a nice 'n' simple explanation.
Just wanted to convey my cynicism about the Roman fort
theory described in the NMR (and elsewhere).

K x