> ...the poster said that it was more that Roman roads
> often went by prehistoric monuments.

Don't listen to that bloke. He talks a load of rubbish.

:-)#

>...Roman roads were comprised of (usually smaller)
> sections of prehistoric trackways and roads joined up...

I realised that when I wrote the post, but it's such a big
area to debate that I opted for a nice 'n' simple explanation.
Just wanted to convey my cynicism about the Roman fort
theory described in the NMR (and elsewhere).

K x