Ritual Landscapes

close
more_vert

In a recent book Richard Bradley conjected that henges were internalised structures, whereas stone circles were externalised. What he was saying was that from inside a hange, you can see little of the landscape around, whereas from inside a stone circle the landscape interacts with the stones, allowing them to highlight specific features and perhaps at specific times.

This of course makes the assumption that by the time of the building of the stone circles, that the tree line was sufficiently far away from the stones so as to allow this interaction to be realised.

I've heard something similar argued about Henges, perhaps by John North though I can't be sure. It was about how there could have been power games going on in henge building that were not present to as great an extent in stone circles. With a henge the people who are standing outside cannot see what is going on within, was the basic point. I'm not sure how much I agree, mind. I tend to see henges as quite communal, inclusive places - big dancefloors, or something of the sort.

The trouble with that theory (henges/internalised...stone circles/externalised) is that there are stone circles within henges.

Three that immediately come to mind, where large banks hide the circle, are Avebury, Arbor Low and the Devil`s Quoits in Oxon.


baz

Yesterday, I just happened to pass by my nearest henge, Condicote in Glos.

There`s very little to see now :o(

However, it has been excavated, and from the snails found, they deduce that it was situated in woodland.

Another thing that I noticed, which is true of others, is that the ditch was dug six feet down *into the bedrock*. That makes me think that they *really* needed to have a ditch there.

Unless `the tribe next door have got a henge so we`re going to have one, too.....whatever it takes.`


baz