nigelswift wrote:
I haven't read the judgment yet (it's 77 pages of technical argument) - it appears that they succeeded on two grounds only out of a lot more. It might be premature to suggest this is the end of it, but it is still a remarkable victory.
I also wonder whether anything in the judgment might have wider application to other heritage sites, but won't know that until I've read it properly.
Good news anyway :)
Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat 30th July 2021ce 17:07 |
Could Stonehenge be stripped of its World Heritage Status (tjj, Jul 23, 2021, 20:22)- Re: Could Stonehenge be stripped of its World Heritage Status (GLADMAN, Jul 24, 2021, 00:49)
- Judicial review decision (thesweetcheat, Jul 30, 2021, 16:51)
- Re: Could Stonehenge be stripped of its World Heritage Status (costaexpress, Jul 31, 2021, 10:51)
- Re: Could Stonehenge be stripped of its World Heritage Status (Rhiannon, Aug 04, 2021, 19:49)
|
|