Also, here's EH's current Conservation Principles. From page 30 (Understanding Heritage Values):
"People may value a place for many reasons beyond utility or personal
association: for its distinctive architecture or landscape, the story it can tell
about its past, its connection with notable people or events, its landform, flora and fauna, because they find it beautiful or inspiring, or for its role as a focus of a community. These are examples of cultural and natural heritage values in the historic environment that people want to enjoy and sustain for the benefit of present and future generations, at every level from the ‘familiar and cherished local scene’ to the nationally or internationally significant place.
Many heritage values are recognised by the statutory designation and
regulation of significant places, where a particular value, such as architectural
or historic interest’ or ‘scientific interest’, is judged to be ‘special’, that is above a defined threshold of importance. Designation necessarily requires the
assessment of the importance of specific heritage values of a place; but
decisions about its day-to-day management should take account of all the values that contribute to its significance. Moreover, the significance of a
place should influence decisions about its future, whether or not it is has
statutory designation.
Although most places of heritage value are used, or are capable of being
used, for some practical purpose, the relationship between their utility and
their heritage values can range from mutual support (in the normal situation
of use justifying appropriate maintenance) to conflict. Places with heritage
values can generate wider social and economic (‘instrumental’) benefits, for
example as a learning or recreational resource, or as a generator of tourism
or inward economic investment, although their potential to do so is affected
by external factors, such as ease of access. Utility and market values, and
instrumental benefits, are different from heritage values in nature and effect.
....
Some values can be appreciated simply as a spontaneous, although culturally
influenced, response; but people’s experience of all heritage values tends to
be enhanced by specific knowledge about the place."
https://content.historicenglan[...]spoliciesguidanceapr08web.pdf/
Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat 21st February 2017ce 20:35 |
Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 15, 2017, 00:18)- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Jan 15, 2017, 09:43)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 16, 2017, 10:33)
- Salisbury bypass (thesweetcheat, Jan 18, 2017, 20:39)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Feb 05, 2017, 10:59)
- Re: Another viewpoint from George Nash (tjj, Feb 08, 2017, 09:46)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Feb 09, 2017, 15:08)
- Re: Julian Richards gives his view on the tunnel (tjj, Feb 18, 2017, 15:02)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Feb 24, 2017, 18:40)
- Re: Friends of the Earth Petition (tjj, Feb 26, 2017, 08:59)
- Re: Dan Hicks - The Apollo Magazine (moss, Feb 27, 2017, 11:20)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Mar 01, 2017, 12:59)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Mar 06, 2017, 08:49)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Mar 16, 2017, 18:31)
- Re: Inside Out West (tjj, Mar 31, 2017, 20:12)
- Re: UNESCO say tunnel should be reconsidered (tjj, Jun 15, 2017, 22:29)
|
|