harestonesdown wrote: Sanctuary wrote: harestonesdown wrote: Sanctuary wrote: thesweetcheat wrote:
Ah yes, thanks Alken.
Didn't know the tump had been reopened !
I give "em" enough stick so have to give credit where it's due here, spiffing work.
On the other hand, shouldn't Trethevy be fenced off before it kills someone ? It looks like it easily could and that would be my immediate priority.
The EH engineer didn't think so Geoff reckoning they see much worse apparently!
Well it's on their heads, or more likely someone elses. There's absolutely no way i'd let any of my loved ones near the thing though.
Three days ago a class of school kidz visited. Poor buggers must have been numbed to the bone it was so cold!
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 2nd March 2013ce 23:16 |
Trethevy Quoit in danger (Sanctuary, Feb 27, 2013, 18:29)- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (tjj, Feb 27, 2013, 19:01)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Squid Tempest, Feb 27, 2013, 19:16)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (thesweetcheat, Feb 27, 2013, 19:33)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (Littlestone, Feb 28, 2013, 10:36)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Nigel (Sanctuary, Mar 05, 2013, 13:58)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger/Dymond Ground Plan (Sanctuary, Mar 06, 2013, 10:18)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (The Heritage Trust, Mar 08, 2013, 15:57)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 16:12)
- OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 17:51)
- Re: OT (nigelswift, Mar 08, 2013, 17:58)
- Re: OT (juamei, Mar 08, 2013, 18:03)
- Re: OT (harestonesdown, Mar 08, 2013, 17:59)
- Re: Trethevy Quoit in danger (bladup, Mar 08, 2013, 16:29)
|
|