Brilliant work, great stuff, that place is listed as a stone circle though the others are not, and when you go to the actual spot your in for a shock because you'll clearly see the stone circle predates any wall, there's even a cairn on the perimeter, the 5 stones are in a circle, i don't think they even look like a triangle at all, but a 5p on the screen and you can see it's a circle not a triangle, i hope you will go take a look in person when you go in october, as like you said it's not exactly horrible up there, thanks for the work but i don't think the other examples show anything about this site, yes it clearly had a wall aimed at it in the past but how many places can you say that about, boscawen un down here used to have a wall going all the way though it and there's loads and loads of other examples as well, so the fact it once had a wall running at it also doesn't mean that much at all, i've been and it's as clear a stone circle as you can see, in stones and position, it's not a triangle at all, ignore the shadows and put a 5p on, it's a circle [ with the 1 stone outside from the wall], please go and have a look in october, take some photo's, put them on here and let everyone decide whether they think it's a stone circle or not, as there will be no problem putting it on here because it's listed in many archaeologist's corpuses of stone circles [ including both burl's and barnatt's ], thanks again for your time and effort, great stuff!