Resonox wrote: The barrows in Reigate Heath have trees planted in them(apparently a Victorian thing....anyone know why??)....and it may have been a common practice elsewhere. "Forests" as we know the expression was a Norman creation and were hunting areas (hence Ashdown forest for eg being thin on the ground tree-wise)...
A good example of this practice continuing is at Deerleap, also in Surrey:
http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]2090/deerleap_wood_barrow.html
The South Walian uplands of Fforest Fawr were apparently set aside for hunting by the local lord.... tree-less - except in sheltered cwms - as you might expect for land in excess of 2,000ft. Guess the 'forest = trees' assumption came around since game usually preferred woodland cover.
Reply | with quote | Posted by GLADMAN 24th September 2011ce 08:40 |
Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (thelonious, Sep 22, 2011, 19:00)- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (thesweetcheat, Sep 22, 2011, 19:05)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (tjj, Sep 22, 2011, 19:18)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (GLADMAN, Sep 22, 2011, 19:41)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (summerlands, Sep 23, 2011, 07:03)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (Howburn Digger, Sep 23, 2011, 08:04)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (GLADMAN, Sep 23, 2011, 23:56)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (GLADMAN, Sep 23, 2011, 23:56)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (Resonox, Sep 24, 2011, 06:03)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (strathspey, Sep 23, 2011, 19:29)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (Megalithics, Sep 23, 2011, 20:50)
- Re: Lack of stone circles north of Inverness? (onecalledk, Sep 30, 2011, 18:29)
|
|