goffik wrote: Pretty sure that, from previous experience, the thing that makes pretty much *anything* fit within TMA's criteria is, quite simply, archaeological or historical evidence.
I've had stuff (yes, wells!) removed or questioned in the past due to lack of evidence of prehistoric use. Even though sometimes - due to location, appearance, or whatever - it just *feels* like it's ancient! :)
G x
This site has no evidence of any use, no finds either as it's not been excavated.
I did question myself whether i should add it here, i did so because as you say, it just feels "right".
http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]in_rock_fall_cave_shelter.html
Reply | with quote | Posted by megadread 3rd January 2011ce 23:55 |
What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (GLADMAN, Jan 03, 2011, 22:16)- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (thesweetcheat, Jan 03, 2011, 22:34)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tjj, Jan 03, 2011, 23:18)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tiompan, Jan 03, 2011, 23:47)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (goffik, Jan 03, 2011, 23:50)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (megadread, Jan 03, 2011, 23:55)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (Rhiannon, Jan 04, 2011, 10:07)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (juamei, Jan 04, 2011, 14:03)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (postman, Jan 04, 2011, 17:38)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tjj, Feb 25, 2011, 14:02)
|
|