My recent visit to Saith Maen confirmed that the giant shake hole a few yards to the north of the site must surely have been part of the original 'vision'. Surely? Just wondering what people have to say about:
1) what criteria need to be met to class an obviously natural feature as a genuine TMA prehistoric ritualistic site? E.g Sacred Hill, rock feature etc.
2) what other examples are there out there, aside from Capel Garmon and Bryn Celli Ddu?
Reply | with quote | Posted by GLADMAN 3rd January 2011ce 22:16 |
What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (GLADMAN, Jan 03, 2011, 22:16)- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (thesweetcheat, Jan 03, 2011, 22:34)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tjj, Jan 03, 2011, 23:18)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tiompan, Jan 03, 2011, 23:47)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (goffik, Jan 03, 2011, 23:50)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (Rhiannon, Jan 04, 2011, 10:07)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (juamei, Jan 04, 2011, 14:03)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (postman, Jan 04, 2011, 17:38)
- Re: What criteria for a natural TMA monument? (tjj, Feb 25, 2011, 14:02)
|
|