The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   General Discussion Forum Start a topic | Search
The Modern Antiquarian
Re: Another million lines
135 messages
Select a forum:
nigelswift wrote:
goffik wrote:
I think I see the problem... It's the "may be", rather than the "has been proven to be". ;)
g x


Yes, that's what I feel. Speculating there "may be" a goblin down the well is fair enough mind you, it's just that if you then start speculating as to why he was put there it starts to get a bit much.


I tend to agree with this point Nigel. But it doesn't take away from the truth of your earlier point that we are trying find lines of sight when faced with what may be a small fraction of the objects that could be part of any such line. Particularly if the objects may not only be no longer there (like a wooden structure) but also may never have been "fixed" to the surface in a way that would leave an archaeological record (like a deliberately placed human pyramid, for the sale of argument).

If we come up with the speculative proposition that there could be a goblin in the well, doesn't it make sense to consider why the goblin might have been there (i.e. what the possible motivation is for a goblin being down there)? I agree that you will not necessarily prove anything at all, but it's a natural consequence of considering the possibility of the goblin being there at all, I think.

So, the statement "there may be a goblin in the well" can naturally be followed with the question "what makes you think that?" or "why would a goblin be in the well?". Possibly a question about the "why" may help to discount, as well as corroborate, a theory about the "what". There may even be a further supplemental question like "how could a notional goblin get in the well?". Answering this question may also disprove the notional goblin speculation, for example if the answer is "it's scientifically impossible* for a goblin to get in that well" then you don't need to go any further with the "there may be a goblin in the well" theory, without needing to go a climb down the well to investigate. :-)

*Of course, this is subjective in itself!


Reply | with quote
thesweetcheat
Posted by thesweetcheat
15th December 2010ce
20:25

In reply to:

Re: Another million lines (nigelswift)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page