|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian General Discussion Forum | Start a topic | Search |
 Re: Ley Lines 158 messages | Select a forum: |
tiompan wrote: Sanctuary wrote: tiompan wrote: nigelswift wrote: "statistically significant" Gotta formula? ;) http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/25391 http://www.themodernantiquaria[...]post/64185/images/silbaby.html In the case mentioned 6 sites within 280 metres with no others in the immediate area . 100 % ? Three points , whether in a straight line or with the central one slightly off don't convince me of intentionality whether in an alignment or based on Orion's belt . And presumably if you are going to claim 3,4,5 or whatever in a row, then the suggestion is that they were all built or placed in position at the same time if their purpose was to simply be a means of getting from A to B. That is clearly not the case when some sites are older/newer than others...unless other lesser markers were used initially of course i.e. timber posts or single stones. Sorry S ,can't see how that relates to the quotes . Sorry myself, I was generalising and tagged it on the wrong post. Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 9th November 2010ce 22:10 In reply to: Re: Ley Lines (tiompan) |
Messages in this topic: |
|