Well, in my view a third is only a third. The full amount is the point here. The fact that he/they threatened to leave Eire if this was rectified was disgraceful egotism and double standards in my opinion. As for U2 behaving like any other corporation, I think that speaks volumes in itself, especially from a self appointed moral pulpit. As a resident of Ireland, he is liable for personal income tax.
Reply | with quote | Posted by The Sea Cat 14th October 2010ce 08:39 |
More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (anthonyqkiernan, Sep 22, 2010, 14:01)- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (toasted-whippet, Sep 22, 2010, 14:17)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Sep 22, 2010, 14:28)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 15:48)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 17:20)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Sep 22, 2010, 18:23)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Oct 08, 2010, 15:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (grufty jim, Oct 08, 2010, 18:33)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Moon Cat, Oct 08, 2010, 18:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Myers, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (PMM, Oct 09, 2010, 10:04)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:05)
- John Pilger's Viewpoint (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:18)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 14, 2010, 09:48)
|
|