sanshee wrote: Keith, I never called anyone reactionary. Don't just say things with no proof.
Why don't you read what you said, Sanshees?
"All this 'you only complain because it's Bono' defence is as reactionary as actually complaining for that very reason."
Is that not saying that everyone who didn't adopt the usual anti-Bono stance here - Grufty, Dodge, Ian, myself - were being 'reactionary'?
That's sure what it looks like to me.
sanshee wrote:
EDIT: You;ve also quoted part of my post by chopping at least one sentece in half!
Not a fair way to do things.
x
Why not? I included both parts of what you said. I didn't cleverly edit them to suit myself. I included it all but answered both parts of the sentence directly.
I don't see anything wrong with that whatsoever.
Reply | with quote | Posted by keith a 13th October 2010ce 12:18 |
More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (anthonyqkiernan, Sep 22, 2010, 14:01)- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (toasted-whippet, Sep 22, 2010, 14:17)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Sep 22, 2010, 14:28)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 15:48)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 17:20)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Sep 22, 2010, 18:23)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Oct 08, 2010, 15:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (grufty jim, Oct 08, 2010, 18:33)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Moon Cat, Oct 08, 2010, 18:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Myers, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (PMM, Oct 09, 2010, 10:04)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:05)
- John Pilger's Viewpoint (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:18)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 14, 2010, 09:48)
|
|