sanshee wrote: That was not the 'initial point' Keith, or rather the initial post.
It was, however, what I was referring to.
Still, it's better to mess about with smokescreens rather than try and explain what you meant. It made no sense before and it makes no sense now, but no worries. I won't lose sleep over it or anything.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by keith a
11th October 2010ce
19:59 |
More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (anthonyqkiernan, Sep 22, 2010, 14:01)- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (toasted-whippet, Sep 22, 2010, 14:17)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Sep 22, 2010, 14:28)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 15:48)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (dodge one, Sep 22, 2010, 17:20)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Sep 22, 2010, 18:23)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (zphage, Oct 08, 2010, 15:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (grufty jim, Oct 08, 2010, 18:33)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Moon Cat, Oct 08, 2010, 18:55)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (Myers, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 08, 2010, 20:43)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (PMM, Oct 09, 2010, 10:04)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:05)
- John Pilger's Viewpoint (The Sea Cat, Oct 13, 2010, 11:18)
- Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (keith a, Oct 14, 2010, 09:48)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: More Bono bashing (never enough IMO) (sanshee)