baza wrote: No stones known to have stood at Marden.
Marden is a henge, not a stone circle.
Rhiannon is correct.
It will be interesting to see if they ever were there like the majority of reports over the past few weeks suggest they were.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary
20th July 2010ce
18:01 |
Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (copius-freakus2, Jul 19, 2010, 16:33)- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 19, 2010, 15:44)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 19, 2010, 20:28)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Rhiannon, Jul 20, 2010, 05:54)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 20, 2010, 07:11)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Rhiannon, Jul 20, 2010, 12:05)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sounder, Jul 20, 2010, 13:10)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 20, 2010, 12:58)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 20, 2010, 13:07)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (baza, Jul 20, 2010, 17:52)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Sanctuary, Jul 20, 2010, 18:01)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (The Eternal, Jul 20, 2010, 21:42)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (tiompan, Jul 21, 2010, 11:08)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwell (goffik, Jul 20, 2010, 05:21)
- Second henge (moss, Jul 28, 2010, 17:32)
- Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (Littlestone, Jul 29, 2010, 12:23)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: Marden Henge dig uncovers 4,500-year-old dwelling (baza)