"Personally, I dont have a problem with the 2nd home idea, so long as MP's cannot profit from this allowance. "
I quite agree, but it should be a rent allowance.
As a result of them designing and enacting a system that obliged us to give them subsidised mortgages they have collectively profited to the tune of hundreds of millions of pounds of capital appreciation. How can that be right? Or alternatively, how can it not be right, when they come to sell their second homes or when they leave our employment (whichever is earliest), for them to repay to us that portion of the capital appreciation that is due to us?
All the fiddles combined are dwarfed by this scandal.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by nigelswift
19th May 2009ce
09:21 |
I'm sorry (Penske666, May 11, 2009, 10:56)- Re: I'm sorry (PMM, May 11, 2009, 11:19)
- Re: I'm sorry (Merrick, May 11, 2009, 15:03)
- Re: I'm sorry (head-first, May 12, 2009, 15:07)
- Re: I'm sorry (Moon Cat, May 12, 2009, 17:46)
- Re: I'm sorry (sanshee, May 13, 2009, 13:00)
- Re: I'm sorry (Eduardo, May 14, 2009, 13:32)
- Re: I'm sorry (PMM, May 14, 2009, 23:43)
- Re: I'm sorry (duckbreath, May 15, 2009, 13:28)
- Fuel for extremists? (head-first, May 15, 2009, 14:19)
- hmm (mojojojo, May 15, 2009, 15:18)
- Re: I'm sorry (anthonyqkiernan, May 16, 2009, 11:36)
- Re: I'm sorry (67 Shelby Mustang, May 17, 2009, 14:18)
- Re: I'm sorry (handofdave, May 17, 2009, 14:26)
- Re: I'm sorry (67 Shelby Mustang, May 17, 2009, 14:42)
- Re: I'm sorry (handofdave, May 17, 2009, 15:13)
- Re: I'm sorry (geoffrey_prime, May 18, 2009, 01:58)
- Re: I'm sorry (nigelswift, May 18, 2009, 06:49)
- Re: I'm sorry (geoffrey_prime, May 19, 2009, 02:06)
- Re: I'm sorry (nigelswift, May 19, 2009, 09:21)
- Re: I'm sorry (handofdave, May 19, 2009, 01:24)
- Re: I'm sorry (geoffrey_prime, May 19, 2009, 03:12)
- Re: I'm sorry (Popel Vooje, May 19, 2009, 16:59)
- Re: I'm sorry (Hunter T Wolfe, May 24, 2009, 21:54)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: I'm sorry (geoffrey_prime)