fitzcoraldo wrote:
Precisely the reason I included it! It looks like successive bouts of water/pebble erosion has taken place, leaving a stepped cone.
However, the main ring certainly doesn't look like that, and although it does use existing cracks or grooves in the stone, I can't see how it would possibly have been done naturally.
Reply | with quote | Posted by slumpystones 4th July 2007ce 20:52 |
F.A.O. Slumpy . (tiompan, Jul 02, 2007, 08:01)- Re: F.A.O. Slumpy . (Paulus, Jul 02, 2007, 09:07)
- Re: F.A.O. Slumpy . (rocknicker, Jul 02, 2007, 09:20)
- Re: F.A.O. Slumpy . (slumpystones, Jul 02, 2007, 10:24)
- Re: F.A.O. Slumpy . (slumpystones, Jul 18, 2007, 13:22)
|
|