Mustard wrote: Littlestone wrote:
Yawn... and all that is very subjective.
No need to be rude. I'm discussing this politely... not attacking your opinion.
Littlestone wrote: Just answer one little question - what in your book is litter?
lit·ter /ˈlɪtər/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[lit-er] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. objects strewn or scattered about; scattered rubbish.
Now we'll have to discuss how we define rubbish. ;)
Hell, I'll pre-empt that....
rub·bish /ˈrʌbɪʃ/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ruhb-ish] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. worthless, unwanted material that is rejected or thrown out
Now seeing as offerings clearly have worth to someone, they can't be absolutely defined as rubbish. Ergo, they're not litter. ;)
Your real name wouldn't be Tony Blare would it ;-)
Reply | with quote | Posted by Littlestone 26th June 2007ce 20:51 |
Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 25, 2007, 15:18)- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tiompan, Jun 25, 2007, 16:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Hob, Jun 25, 2007, 17:18)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 26, 2007, 11:26)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 26, 2007, 14:45)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 26, 2007, 23:14)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tomwatts, Jun 27, 2007, 14:57)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Paulus, Jun 27, 2007, 21:24)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (FourWinds, Jun 28, 2007, 05:51)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (goffik, Jun 28, 2007, 06:07)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (ocifant, Jun 28, 2007, 06:30)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (tuesday, Jun 28, 2007, 08:41)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mustard, Jun 29, 2007, 18:04)
- New Code (nigelswift, Jun 28, 2007, 11:52)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Mirla, Jun 29, 2007, 15:27)
- Re: Ancient sites: Protect or Use? (Vybik Jon, Sep 17, 2012, 14:26)
|
|