I am constantly stunned by the ineptness of our more recent archaeologists - this is supposed to be an important site culturally, and yet the most obvious [let's face it, the Romans were messy bastards] remains of all have not been noticed.
It says so much for the last 100 years that everything is being redone to get the right answers.
Reply | with quote | Posted by slumpystones 10th March 2007ce 10:40 |
Romans pay homage to Silbury? (Littlestone, Mar 10, 2007, 07:27)- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (copius-freakus2, Mar 10, 2007, 09:15)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (slumpystones, Mar 10, 2007, 10:40)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (Chris Collyer, Mar 10, 2007, 11:09)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (Kammer, Mar 10, 2007, 11:50)
- Silbury - The Devils Hill (Pete G, Mar 10, 2007, 14:24)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (moss, Mar 14, 2007, 07:34)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (Littlestone, Apr 11, 2007, 10:13)
- Re: Romans pay homage to Silbury? (hotaire, Apr 22, 2007, 15:02)
|
|