|
 Log in |
Register
|
|
 Head To Head The Modern Antiquarian Stonehenge Forum | Start a topic | Search |
61 messages | Select a forum: |
Pete G wrote: Littlestone wrote: I don't think they pre-assembled the whole thing upside down ;) It makes sense that the Stonehenge builders wouldn't want older mortise holes to be visible from the ground - that would look sloppy. well there is a bluestone with mortice holes that is lying down with another stone across it. That was from a later age and a different set of architects/designers though - and with an obviously limited number of bluestones to go round, maybe it was a case of necessity. I doubt anyone would suddenly click their fingers and say "I know - there's a better one in Boles Barrow!" Reply | with quote |  1st January 2007ce 14:25 In reply to: Re: Stonehenge lintel holes (Pete G) |
Messages in this topic: |
|