Whoa Treeman, I'm not dismissive of nowt oh arboreal one.
If there's any snidey slant in what I've said, It'll be no more than the result of a sense of disappointment that something previously held as possibly paranormal, however unlikely, was a bit more mundane than I'd have maybe hoped. I also only discount my experience. Just 'cos I experience non-paranormal orbs on my digital pics, doesn't mean all orbs on all digital pics are of similarly mundane origin. There might be paranormal orbs out there for all I know.
Either ways, even a split second of true "Whoooaaaa!Blimeywouldyoulookatthat" experience is a thing to be treasured :)
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Hob
24th December 2004ce
01:34 |
"Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 01:21)- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (goffik, Dec 23, 2004, 09:58)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Kammer, Dec 23, 2004, 10:07)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 23, 2004, 10:52)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Hob, Dec 23, 2004, 11:15)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (nigelswift, Dec 23, 2004, 11:43)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (superboss, Dec 23, 2004, 12:21)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:36)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:37)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:37)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (fitzcoraldo, Dec 24, 2004, 11:12)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (goffik, Dec 23, 2004, 13:29)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:31)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:29)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Hob, Dec 23, 2004, 11:20)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (superboss, Dec 23, 2004, 12:24)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Moth, Dec 23, 2004, 15:34)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman, Dec 23, 2004, 23:40)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Hob, Dec 24, 2004, 01:34)
- The Orb at Avebury (FourWinds, Dec 24, 2004, 11:49)
- Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (laresident, Dec 24, 2004, 17:13)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: "Orbs" at Avebury (Treeman)