Looking back through some old notes I’ve found that I’ve often called fallen stones ‘recumbent’ in the past – oops!.
I suppose its easy to call stones recumbent when they’re lying their sides but maybe we ought to save the term for the ‘real’ recumbents, which aren’t lying down – they just have tops and bottoms that are longer then the sides (if that makes any sense).
As FW’s says I don’t think there are any real RSC’s outside Scotland and Ireland, but I could be wrong – one of the stones at Doll Tor looks like a miniature ‘recumbent’
-Chris
 Reply | with quote | Posted by Chris Collyer
1st April 2003ce
22:15 |
Recumbent or just fallen over? (Rhiannon, Mar 31, 2003, 10:10)- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (elderford, Mar 31, 2003, 10:16)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (FourWinds, Mar 31, 2003, 12:48)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (Kammer, Mar 31, 2003, 13:17)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (Rhiannon, Mar 31, 2003, 14:36)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (FourWinds, Mar 31, 2003, 16:27)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (broen, Mar 31, 2003, 16:59)
- RSC's (Chris Collyer, Mar 31, 2003, 19:29)
- Re: RSC's (broen, Mar 31, 2003, 23:03)
- Re: RSC's (FourWinds, Apr 01, 2003, 06:34)
- Re: RSC's (Chris Collyer, Apr 01, 2003, 22:15)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (AR, Jul 06, 2004, 21:19)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (broen, Mar 31, 2003, 17:44)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (pure joy, Apr 05, 2003, 22:22)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (baza, Mar 31, 2003, 19:03)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (FourWinds, Mar 31, 2003, 21:41)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (AR, Jul 06, 2004, 21:26)
- Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (AR, Jul 06, 2004, 21:44)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: RSC's (broen)