The Modern Antiquarian. Stone Circles, Ancient Sites, Neolithic Monuments, Ancient Monuments, Prehistoric Sites, Megalithic MysteriesThe Modern Antiquarian
Home Latest Posts Forums Maps Help
Browse Sites News Blog Contributors The Books
Head To Head   The Modern Antiquarian   Arbor Low Forum Start a topic | Search
Arbor Low
Re: Recumbent or just fallen over?
32 messages
Select a forum:
i seem to remember that one of them lies at an angle (as opposed to flat on the ground) suggesting that it originally stood upright.

there's also mention of earlier in the 20th century an old boy could remember as a lad seeing when one or more were standing, but i've never heard any hard facts on that one.

i think the idea is that the stones weren't put up very well, and so could have toppled very quickly.


Reply | with quote		Posted by elderford
31st March 2003ce
10:16

In reply to:

Recumbent or just fallen over? (Rhiannon)

1 reply:

Re: Recumbent or just fallen over? (FourWinds)

Messages in this topic:

Terms & Conditions  |  Home  |  Julian Cope presents Head Heritage Top of page