i'll log on tomorrow and hopefully there will be a barrage of negative threads. The reply to Alison is a bit weak: we did it all scientifically but that bit was edited out (presumably to make them out to be rank amateurs having a fun day out).
I'm just amazed that on the one hand you're trying to do something constructive and get people involved and the best the bbc can manage (with all those resources at their disposal) is to re-enact how it was destroyed.
What a pointless exercise. I would have given that stone a loving home or at least set it free, i'm going to bed in a drunken huff now.
 Reply | with quote | Posted by elderford
6th December 2002ce
01:47 |
Avebury TV alert !!!! (konaman, Dec 05, 2002, 19:37)- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (konaman, Dec 05, 2002, 19:37)
- Unbelievable! (Pete G, Dec 05, 2002, 20:09)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Grendel, Dec 05, 2002, 21:01)
- They have a forum You know? (Pete G, Dec 05, 2002, 23:42)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Squid Tempest, Dec 06, 2002, 09:37)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (Duck Call, Dec 06, 2002, 13:34)
- Re: Avebury TV alert !!!! (pixie, Dec 06, 2002, 14:46)
- may I dissent? (RiotGibbon, Dec 06, 2002, 16:09)
- Death at Avebury (Pete G, Dec 06, 2002, 21:09)
|
|
Head To Head 
Re: goddamn! i'm just too middle-classed (Pete G)