Howburn Digger wrote:
....
No-one has suggested that those visitors to Stonehenge who dislike traffic should just learn to fecking live with it. How did the offended tourists get to Stonehenge in the first place - perhaps by hoverboard? If the sounds of passing lorries and agricultural vehicles offends them perhaps Stonehenge should be uprooted and re-erected somewhere much quieter (perhaps in Norfolk).
I don't think the govt's motivation for planning to spend millions on a tunnel is because some visitors have complained about traffic noise is it???
The business case for doing anything at all is to speed traffic up isn't it? The motivation is nothing to do with the Stonehenge visitor and everything to do with traffic management. Or am I missing something here?
Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat 1st December 2020ce 22:56 |
Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (tjj, Nov 12, 2020, 18:04)- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 13, 2020, 09:25)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (GLADMAN, Nov 15, 2020, 00:16)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thelonious, Nov 16, 2020, 18:51)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (thesweetcheat, Nov 18, 2020, 08:53)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (nigelswift, Dec 01, 2020, 17:20)
- Re: Stonehenge Tunnel Decision (Howburn Digger, Dec 01, 2020, 18:49)
|
|