Wow - you two really could start an argument in an empty room!!!
I'll try to answer the question "by how much it would have to be "wrong" to make the figures acceptable.", if I may?
Unless they're out by 100% it implies the action is still taking place and - as we've all agreed - the action is 'unacceptable. So your answer there is 100%.
HOWEVER Roy hasn't ever said the action is 'acceptable' and has only suggested that the projected number may be "grossly exaggerated".
(Plucking a number from thin air) I'd suggest that is the number is out by 25% or more that may constitute 'grossly exaggerated' - feel free to bicker over this though as it's only one view!!!!
Reply | with quote | Posted by Locodogz 6th February 2018ce 11:33 |
Detectorists (Sanctuary, May 16, 2017, 09:33)- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, May 16, 2017, 09:44)
- Re: Detectorists (tjj, May 17, 2017, 13:47)
- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, Jun 05, 2017, 12:44)
- Detectorists (Sanctuary, Oct 31, 2017, 17:04)
- Re: Detectorists (moss, Dec 13, 2017, 13:03)
- Re: Detectorists (costaexpress, Dec 21, 2017, 16:49)
- Re: Detectorists Petition (Sanctuary, Jan 20, 2018, 12:15)
- Re: Detectorists (Sanctuary, Feb 20, 2018, 13:20)
|
|