Thanks Nigel an George. I've gone back through the documents and, whilst I don't agree that it is impossible, I think that you are probably both correct that the mechanisms to give the archaeology of the Stonehenge WHS a higher valuation (that would be acceptable as evidence in a consultation) either do not exist or would not be accepted.
It's been a very useful chat, thanks.
Reply | with quote | Posted by jonmor 26th February 2017ce 09:54 |
Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 15, 2017, 00:18)- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Jan 15, 2017, 09:43)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 16, 2017, 10:33)
- Salisbury bypass (thesweetcheat, Jan 18, 2017, 20:39)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Feb 05, 2017, 10:59)
- Re: Another viewpoint from George Nash (tjj, Feb 08, 2017, 09:46)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Feb 09, 2017, 15:08)
- Re: Julian Richards gives his view on the tunnel (tjj, Feb 18, 2017, 15:02)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Feb 24, 2017, 18:40)
- Re: Friends of the Earth Petition (tjj, Feb 26, 2017, 08:59)
- Re: Dan Hicks - The Apollo Magazine (moss, Feb 27, 2017, 11:20)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Mar 01, 2017, 12:59)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Mar 06, 2017, 08:49)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Mar 16, 2017, 18:31)
- Re: Inside Out West (tjj, Mar 31, 2017, 20:12)
- Re: UNESCO say tunnel should be reconsidered (tjj, Jun 15, 2017, 22:29)
|
|