Not totally compatible with Julian Richards on all points maybe, but in agreement that a tunnel proposed is a bad idea.
I haven't seen any professional archaeos (unless concealed behind an "HE statement" etc) coming out in favour of the current proposal except for Mike Pitts. The discussion that I've seen has been around the nature of their particular opposition.
Reply | with quote | Posted by thesweetcheat 21st February 2017ce 19:47 |
Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 15, 2017, 00:18)- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Jan 15, 2017, 09:43)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Jan 16, 2017, 10:33)
- Salisbury bypass (thesweetcheat, Jan 18, 2017, 20:39)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Jan 24, 2017, 10:37)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Feb 05, 2017, 10:59)
- Re: Another viewpoint from George Nash (tjj, Feb 08, 2017, 09:46)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Feb 09, 2017, 15:08)
- Re: Julian Richards gives his view on the tunnel (tjj, Feb 18, 2017, 15:02)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Feb 24, 2017, 18:40)
- Re: Friends of the Earth Petition (tjj, Feb 26, 2017, 08:59)
- Re: Dan Hicks - The Apollo Magazine (moss, Feb 27, 2017, 11:20)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (moss, Mar 01, 2017, 12:59)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (tjj, Mar 06, 2017, 08:49)
- Re: Highways England Consultation - A303/Stonehenge (thesweetcheat, Mar 16, 2017, 18:31)
- Re: Inside Out West (tjj, Mar 31, 2017, 20:12)
- Re: UNESCO say tunnel should be reconsidered (tjj, Jun 15, 2017, 22:29)
|
|