nigelswift wrote: You want the probable answer, that officialdom is frit to voice? IMO it's because they're concerned that if they try to impose a charge there'll be all sorts of disorder and it could become a focus for lots of political agendas like before.
Then they should have been clever (maybe they have already been so) and included in the extortionate entry charge a portion to pay for it without making it known.
Reply | with quote | Posted by Sanctuary 14th August 2014ce 16:20 |
Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Jul 10, 2014, 13:39)- Re: Stonehenge - again! (juamei, Jul 10, 2014, 13:43)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Evergreen Dazed, Jul 10, 2014, 15:51)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Jul 14, 2014, 10:27)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 06, 2014, 12:23)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (CARL, Aug 11, 2014, 13:05)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 11, 2014, 15:54)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 09:09)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (sleeptowin, Aug 14, 2014, 15:41)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 14, 2014, 21:31)
- Re: Stonehenge - again! (Sanctuary, Aug 15, 2014, 21:17)
|
|